Subject: Re: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive?

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:

>> > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs
>> > command.
>> 
>> Make sense to me.  I've now done this in Emacs 27.
>
> Should this be in NEWS?  How about manuals?

I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer
isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem
newsworthy.  

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no