From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:44:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Resent-From: Aydar Zarifullin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157429149825503 (code B ref -1); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:12:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2019 23:11:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXZ8L-0006dG-UY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:11:38 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXYQV-0005Tc-Uv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:26:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXYQU-00056r-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:26:19 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXYQT-00038F-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:26:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:35721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXYQT-00035t-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:26:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id s5so1948495wrw.2 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:26:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Qu8YYsxyl54gDuAZYaLSwNNl8UnKJS2oGePP2ZEnugg=; b=d9fAzF8TvOSaMdphscQU8OKz0CN00iRoAB/1Lbo4O8+22NwysGF+ylON39zwQWcL2R 3t90EZ+DqafV26VlfDlgIOEKnebJZGtQdLBngSJunsY5c4MaTTQfpwqsNkrIoB4jzLb2 0HzECW4rrtWvv38/QPNOZYKCgZuWFyDV9xTRl2mEwQjuces7Ce9Hi+uH7C0xkqF4c3Gw nDn/7IkSk/kfKggDdU5k1MzWe5LJTZZhg133KqljMYKPNgHLqUKYVAIZo3oz5BCMIDLb RxS+UgmqYnVQwGAPvvIb/V2XNvlD+R8TzHgJG31c8EMU2UHWuLzzJrHbzCsLQvaxueWM xvag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Qu8YYsxyl54gDuAZYaLSwNNl8UnKJS2oGePP2ZEnugg=; b=PidYLm6dcNbVu35nFGl/tuzDu1sZ1GaveCz5SlCcLJ1dDPCjZgyNc8aNga6W3zoFcd C/iBKMH21nZuFZ65CGmwXFldvexeLYZOF6ZOfJd8nLKgzYQfiyplHzQ3txaZZWH6tw7g DpB2Vkj3khjbcVZs107WDOvAE8SRBxoVENwG3InHSXDK7HzPbrnOskTOj5atg9F6njzO sigsI7QDvsMo2mbR11GkV/dEPRhMyoLijDotADOPvIyT/sKZnbf7263QDyj3Cth/QWSS 8IIr462gMKb5vLwf9EX84lI2zf46NQzR8IVbymTIORF2eI7gyQO8HHGv9XJ/CDStlyp7 3TWw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXa/8/8sZ9fVH03AxWVZTHK3LWOA82YmIxUOyKuusD8cRV1KGR3 4XYiSlgp+qhM9575krfu2bp1xPvyTvzkzE+JIoUX X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyTI0h/tIArGmq2ZWTES91zeRNYa6ER2GjCSXVtUAwTymMR0zwvebAGfbaqV8LNMhPDuFOgpQKx1Ifk+jTdbsk= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe89:: with SMTP id l9mr6266609wrr.368.1574288775583; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:26:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Aydar Zarifullin Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:26:03 +0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e1b5f0597ceab38" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::436 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:11:36 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --0000000000003e1b5f0597ceab38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs command. --0000000000003e1b5f0597ceab38 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs command.
--0000000000003e1b5f0597ceab38-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:44:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Aydar Zarifullin Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.157434179330104 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 13:09:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXmDZ-0007pU-89 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:09:53 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXmDX-0007pF-BM for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:09:52 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXmDP-0004er-IH; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:45 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Aydar Zarifullin's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:26:03 +0400") Message-ID: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Aydar Zarifullin writes: > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs > command. Make sense to me. I've now done this in Emacs 27. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Aydar Zarifullin writes: > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs > command. Make sense to me. I've now done this in Emacs 27. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 21 08:09:58 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 13:09:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXmDe-0007pn-J4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:09:58 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:59004) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXmDb-0007pL-CF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:09:55 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXmDT-0004ey-Sj for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:49 +0100 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:47 +0100 Message-Id: <87a78p1ilg.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #38306 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 38306 fixed close 38306 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 38306 fixed close 38306 27.1 quit From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:44:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org, aydar.js@gmail.com Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.15743465552922 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 14:29:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXnSM-0000l0-85 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:29:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXnSH-0000kj-Vz for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:29:11 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXnSC-0008U6-RF; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:29:04 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3712 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iXnSB-0006q3-2D; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:29:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:29:15 +0200 Message-Id: <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:42 +0100) References: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:09:42 +0100 > Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org > > Aydar Zarifullin writes: > > > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs > > command. > > Make sense to me. I've now done this in Emacs 27. Should this be in NEWS? How about manuals? Thanks. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:44:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org, aydar.js@gmail.com Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.157435853323848 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 17:48:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53261 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZY-0006Ca-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:48:52 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZW-0006CJ-GO for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:48:51 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZK-0007ui-MA; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:41 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:29:15 +0200") Message-ID: <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs >> > command. >> >> Make sense to me. I've now done this in Emacs 27. > > Should this be in NEWS? How about manuals? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs >> > command. >> >> Make sense to me. I've now done this in Emacs 27. > > Should this be in NEWS? How about manuals? I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem newsworthy. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:44:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org, aydar.js@gmail.com Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.157435968025601 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 18:08:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs3-0006er-OW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:08:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqs1-0006ee-KS for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:58 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqrw-0003fS-Hy; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:52 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1234 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqrv-0003wL-BA; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:07:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:08:03 +0200 Message-Id: <83eey1xfuk.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100) References: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: aydar.js@gmail.com, 38306@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100 > > > Should this be in NEWS? How about manuals? > > I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer > isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem > newsworthy. I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command. But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will need to know about, fine with me. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:44:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org, aydar.js@gmail.com Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.157437695821231 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 22:55:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXvMk-0005WN-9B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:55:58 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXvMi-0005W4-1x for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:55:57 -0500 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXvMU-00056x-Sa; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:55:45 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> <83eey1xfuk.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:55:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83eey1xfuk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:08:03 +0200") Message-ID: <87tv6wvnyq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command. > But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will > need to know about, fine with me. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ingebrigtsen.no] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm asking whether it should be documented, now that it's a command. > But if you think it's an unimportant command that almost no one will > need to know about, fine with me. Yeah, it's pretty minor, and people can discover it via M-x pp-TAB if they're into pretty-printing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no