GNU bug report logs - #38294
[PATCH] Handle killing of virtual buffers in Ido

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dario Gjorgjevski <dario.gjorgjevski <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:58:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: fixed, patch

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Dario Gjorgjevski <dario.gjorgjevski <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>, 38294 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38294: [PATCH] Handle killing of virtual buffers in Ido
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 12:29:20 +0200
Dario Gjorgjevski <dario.gjorgjevski <at> gmail.com> writes:

> To me, both _not offering virtual buffers to be killed at all_ and
> _offering them but treating killing as removing from ‘recentf-list’_
> make sense.  The latter I prefer simply for consistency with
> ‘ido-kill-buffer-at-head’ (i.e., function that is called when you press
> ‘C-k’ on a buffer during ‘C-x b’).

Yeah, I think you're right, and the original patch was the correct
solution here: When the user explicitly (and interactively) kills a
buffer, then they expect that buffer to go away.  (There isn't any other
reasonable interpretation for that interactive action.)

It's perhaps slightly inconsistent, but I think it's more DWIM.

So I'm applying your patch to Emacs 28, and we'll see if any users of
this ido setting complains (in which case we should be prepared to
revert it).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 331 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.