From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 16 13:26:14 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2019 18:26:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iW2ly-0001t8-CD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:26:14 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iW2lv-0001t0-LV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:26:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iW2lu-0003mZ-NS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:26:11 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,BODY_URI_ONLY, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iW2lt-0003j3-Qa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:26:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:39548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iW2lt-0003is-LM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:26:09 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t26so14281630wmi.4 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:26:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=Pz8A7U459RpEqKvWlFodH7HOzubWfvXYxgHeFue+wWY=; b=esvWaWOG/Lz1pqDnii3Sg0YzlXE6sbR8dkFrD/LIRaoCCkZaw988KUyC8qs5NKHruT Yv2WCLP/NQ4EW/OLRUufYw80Qm9GRqr5ag3jw8pV2yQ7eQ3+PqcWaIb/YTjxtfxV7zi1 yY/BOf6Pi43bHmrR5eDv9qnk6dnWuIc4dX4xfrrde5Pn0+h4Tj+0YZO6FH/iro2IIS0X JdFxv5fNXJuRslZchHPBYtF8od5GIKD9zDnNxPg3Na+qo036DMOMXhMvRqTK1kByOLhy 7t2MXBWFaNBKRCBo/xpS5HX7FAfq9c5ugyzcof5m9bw9ojFGJjof5D9efWYs9D3k5a1j s7Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAViUyDrDALnMVoN2QI0B+vViBLy2Q1FxkfIX20z96H7XbwzHHnV vAlB3EaXgxqfRFWCddBwnV6i7Ny6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8EL+P/VFGXKWu/qiKdFDwECEunlDebCp4cpjQOqazzPtcKJGK4RWsO7KPc9lyVEHT0igEQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7f54:: with SMTP id a81mr21991620wmd.48.1573928767911; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:26:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:311f:684b:e163:58d6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm18559423wmf.0.2019.11.16.10.26.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:26:07 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:26:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.128.49 X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: See https://ci.guix.info/build/1934383/details. Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: guix.info] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 1.0 BODY_URI_ONLY Message body is only a URI in one line of text or for an image 2.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) See https://ci.guix.info/build/1934383/details. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 17 03:28:02 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 08:28:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWFuc-0005xT-JC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:28:02 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWFub-0005wr-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:28:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWFuZ-0006FL-VY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:28:00 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWFuY-0006b1-No for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:27:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::434]:36804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWFuY-0006Wp-Fp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:27:58 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r10so15877543wrx.3 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:27:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=lUbEOF9+QLlo9twREH07Mk3Ly2p2x1nrrLt+edEjM6k=; b=T9iHV9CWjs3aaBJ6ut/oSenqUN8cHKZRpYYyTVjiB4D2FbL5COyeguUsMwRJCIjkD/ zDwHmt1Yd6n2J7Yv1VoEUc2xFQMYnZZdEfkpqPacG6KnVzUVTGH9JCUhpuIM6dGGAd+o o6n7ITionxLrq/DPAdmGdU4E0jsGbUgb2h4NdEM2rD/XWgiZ5qqDXRTU+IrFE6kAtUYd 3ZrP8wjsWAfsBZQH5g77luv8TKxNT01Xk6PxAW05mbZf//HVdCSRIo9axa3JIS+UA4Av gFE1T208x3Go2hm5k3ilWp1n5jcqNmwoYjbn6+thWO2T9JhJir6jonyO/Dqbm+5Me2tK YKJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=lUbEOF9+QLlo9twREH07Mk3Ly2p2x1nrrLt+edEjM6k=; b=XeTSWI8qBpGS31b+hZ1px9p+7LjBMuKtKJXpiI46ghRmDDIh7fE/SBXRmwuclkYEIL jHPTRGiXXk6Xoj3KgtlWjm6iveO7aN8vFwcrcyuKJratHNbE43lrjPNRX1grciYsvFoZ tMODy8KcJXxkO7M3aqoKWn9evVdB/7daPYyv/5H+w9ceshnp6XUbiSwFVd0ijrBZsN8i TUumHqIIDJGSsag/7UyZHL6NY9MDMYG9PqPOXn1gBGGPzAeGgG/u5pQU5vImxY05qTlG 0JuIXU73JTuFTIzT6eN7CWQvawtASPC0Ps3PlMduCxiPtQz0FVpqgBDsf+lbmkQELbTI h4Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVNrxP+DyKxdIsGbPQhOHUfWe9xSvGALMAbW5v9M94m0yoeu8tr bY7RR0U93nDDiVLIxQa99l0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6XY/B5SzyRcjAN9FY0K6qg0rD+JJJl0Xqfm++ik8KXTn0uUAzMh392VuG9FGy3Y5DAE/ofA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:12d1:: with SMTP id l17mr23588413wrx.261.1573979275779; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from cervin ([2a01:e0a:fa:a50:91fd:8f59:7912:94f9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm16855048wmh.17.2019.11.17.00.27.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:27:54 -0800 (PST) References: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#38232: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' In-reply-to: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 09:27:45 +0100 Message-ID: <874kz2vrem.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::434 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 38232@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, It seems to be also an issue for evaluations that look successful but are reported as failed, see here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/8641/log/raw -> mark as failed https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/8725/log/raw -> mark as failed Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 17 05:56:55 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 10:56:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWIEh-0006aw-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:56:55 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39067) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWIEf-0006an-HG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:56:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWIEe-0006SI-6W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:56:53 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWIEd-0000hI-2b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:56:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::434]:44793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWIEc-0000gY-SX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:56:51 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id f2so16071360wrs.11 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:56:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=vG0AmyJ+adwagTtm4NJWXATDEqwBF6fcW+A8lGT6OxA=; b=XH7h01BXRIKGeD44BbDzW+ix9C9k4+crHwKBZXHSc+zQgss1h+cIFgh7roWxcJWOzN +LAyYHnWZrT1h40DdED3XmhF0GVYvcUfMy41ML962LaWXT1QOdp3ho5oPfnPiYaDob54 mvLKdnJRONGIU4HXhBYR+oW8t1DHIVI67w5PJsGcJ8v/hXdEJuAWCv9lwsdNJSDzwyB0 TO96NXSbNILE3ZPJqCJGi0CULsMmRAk6IgFULI8h2NV42o5UXG8lhnbnQxXnOBSfYJpI ha5YcfgBRDKL0VREDUWDldlS7zUkCFGOC1PvKgjwwAOsbetDxTCJhnYPWL7b8NmCNvHr BN0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=vG0AmyJ+adwagTtm4NJWXATDEqwBF6fcW+A8lGT6OxA=; b=DN7F8YwKWNgH4kxmmAjsOBGBS1JTBfIyqil5hG3qBHA85mGReMzb3ZDsZl3kEFD3F1 b6IFO97eECnoSRbCGlOxXuj5U1LFtAc4bZZYlW2ASEdz12ho7t+D834rj4q04lXmkS+D 8HqerldkmCMdtBY/XEswAHzrE3++p/bbboynxG1Svl+mdPjYKYeJ1evKQPomo13ZeQld b8Q0RbZ0uqC4s9j3MDjYGltsFN7P/AvvHI9zf2sf/6yVHPuOHXxC2Z9jRUkT6wC+IrsD Mx5GTWHX4ObpbzoCUevRE9CQQBJDLApM0tcOvWM8v+3CX4PePM0pWP1jxFSsMk1qKmrG fG5w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHR4GjpS+Gmi9hpQLnlw0o3kwNuxTs/HeCzIytzeHRVrVFn9w/ bl3BpN1yzUkKHN68u0zZZrjfs7Z9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpP4x2uUCl+LnV2RO+e0P1/T7+FtOMIVKHnuNBVrJtBkuBstWgNFrD1DkaMK2etkPcN1v9Rw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:518c:: with SMTP id k12mr24553636wrv.104.1573988209372; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from cervin ([2a01:e0a:fa:a50:91fd:8f59:7912:94f9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f67sm16510768wme.16.2019.11.17.02.56.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:56:48 -0800 (PST) References: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> <874kz2vrem.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#38232: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' In-reply-to: <874kz2vrem.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:56:41 +0100 Message-ID: <8736emvkie.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::434 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 38232@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) > It seems to be also an issue for evaluations that look successful but > are reported as failed, see here: Looking at those evaluation logs, I think there is yet another issue. On core-updates: * Evaluation 8747 fails because it cannot build curl (https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/8748/log/raw). * Next evaluation 8762, considers curl build as previously failed: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... builder for `/gnu/store/1510sg9h2ivq4841gqm9dhmq5l50a52b-curl-7.66.0' failed previously (cached) @ build-failed /gnu/store/pqfnxfk5xx0ngc32wlq87vhchh80mnkw-curl-7.66.0.drv - cached--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and fails immediately. The curl build problem (at 8747 evaluation) seems related to some failed test case (1242) that I cannot reproduce locally. Will all future evaluations re-use this cache and also fail immediately? If yes, how can we unblock the situation? Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 17 16:24:19 2019 Received: (at 38232) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 21:24:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWS1q-0002DO-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:24:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57025) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWS1o-0002DA-L9 for 38232@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:24:16 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWS1j-00012a-6g; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:24:11 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=52798 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iWS1h-0001pm-OB; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:24:10 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: bug#38232: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' References: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 27 Brumaire an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:24:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:26:06 +0100") Message-ID: <87y2wei4cn.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38232 Cc: 38232@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > See https://ci.guix.info/build/1934383/details. Perhaps the build failed (transient failure or something) but was eventually restarted either as a dependency of some other build or manually on berlin. In that case Cuirass may be unaware that the build eventually succeeded, hence the discrepancy. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 18 12:04:00 2019 Received: (at 38232) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2019 17:04:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWkRU-0005Zj-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:04:00 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:42990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWkRR-0005ZV-HE for 38232@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:03:58 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a15so20406777wrf.9 for <38232@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:03:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fFLF7jJLfPIeZDs2v/g3pg1xxrbtoozZ84lBJBpZCvg=; b=HEV/EY1GSsPhCJURoNU4kdXbnWVEU7sA5JYHipCskhA7SSH9EvDZZ2lxyJcnWERfJ+ uB5h+PYEz/VR0cq4P+ZN4Lg4mioc5SCrFWHYsz+uQ8gJ9/HmDQLQYoMfU7cJ+DHrKINz 9wrQ7rB3nGHYAslQCSh7FNSymN78UyKeap+1zxRuRXL8dRybu+ES/uTdWhzejjyp44cl H9Qpwk/vMf9z/F7aXzQEQS1dChBR1jsDAk9nj/GN//hPECDuZY3Mc7jyHL0AeC+Xse9x 9x92XGkSUT03nJgzwhlXrztfgHf66DeoN7KGWzsH0/s636aEtYFUB2bHFYju67GTiNfJ sthw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWmecN0pRfM+rx8613FdH3KyXZoB/UsV8K+jQs/KF0OxMiYiKJH meHiRyMwpjzKq2wi26IpBN98C144 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyiCp9CG3TgqrNvO3m9ZwE0a+7YmBaBOGntEynfnwGfax5Ev5tTD0lBj+bqgO2xaZprHuoYLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c8c:: with SMTP id z12mr17520681wrs.347.1574096630434; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz. [62.23.167.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm23744468wrw.6.2019.11.18.09.03.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:03:46 -0800 (PST) References: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> <87y2wei4cn.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#38232: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' In-reply-to: <87y2wei4cn.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 18:03:46 +0100 Message-ID: <877e3xjevh.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 4.0 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ludovic, > Perhaps the build failed (transient failure or something) but was > eventually restarted either as a dependency of some other build or > manually on berlin. In that case Cuirass may be unaware that [...] Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [62.23.167.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38232 Cc: 38232@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ludovic, > Perhaps the build failed (transient failure or something) but was > eventually restarted either as a dependency of some other build or > manually on berlin. In that case Cuirass may be unaware that [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [62.23.167.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different Hi Ludovic, > Perhaps the build failed (transient failure or something) but was > eventually restarted either as a dependency of some other build or > manually on berlin. In that case Cuirass may be unaware that the build > eventually succeeded, hence the discrepancy. Thank you for the explanation. Would it make sense to copy the log file to some other place when the build is done? The web interface would fetch it there, and we would be sure it matches the associated Cuirass build. Cl=C3=A9ment From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 18 15:22:30 2019 Received: (at 38232) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2019 20:22:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWnXa-00034E-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:22:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46765) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWnXY-00033z-37 for 38232@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:22:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWnXS-0003pr-RW; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:22:22 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=57556 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iWnXS-0005S7-Dw; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:22:22 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: bug#38232: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' References: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> <87y2wei4cn.fsf@gnu.org> <877e3xjevh.fsf@lassieur.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 Brumaire an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:22:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877e3xjevh.fsf@lassieur.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Mon, 18 Nov 2019 18:03:46 +0100") Message-ID: <87blt9gcjn.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38232 Cc: 38232@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: >> Perhaps the build failed (transient failure or something) but was >> eventually restarted either as a dependency of some other build or >> manually on berlin. In that case Cuirass may be unaware that the build >> eventually succeeded, hence the discrepancy. > > Thank you for the explanation. Would it make sense to copy the log file > to some other place when the build is done? The web interface would > fetch it there, and we would be sure it matches the associated Cuirass > build. Build logs are kept by guix-daemon under /var/log/guix/drvs. They are indexed by derivation, meaning that there can be only one log per derivation. This is a limitation in cases where builds are retried. Initially Mathieu Lirzin thought about keeping logs elsewhere so we could distinguish between several attempts to build a derivation. However, that=E2=80=99s kind of redundant with what the daemon does, and not frequen= tly useful. Now, it is indeed useful in some cases, so we could do something like you describe. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 25 09:07:06 2021 Received: (at 38232-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2021 13:07:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPhZ-0006iE-Tv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:07:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPhY-0006hl-DU for 38232-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:07:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPhR-0002qt-S6 for 38232-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:06:58 -0400 Received: from [2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:6893:84b0:dbe3:3cb1] (port=44532 helo=mathieu-HP-EliteBook-840-G1) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPhD-0004yi-Ah for 38232-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:06:45 -0400 To: 38232-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#38232: Cuirass: Some builds fail although their log file ends with 'build-succeeded' References: <87y2wfptj5.fsf@lassieur.org> <874kz2vrem.fsf@gmail.com> <8736emvkie.fsf@gmail.com> From: Mathieu Othacehe Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:06:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8736emvkie.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:56:41 +0100") Message-ID: <8735wj5qn1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38232-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hello, This is no longer an issue on Cuirass master. Thanks, Mathieu From unknown Sun Sep 07 01:43:38 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator