From unknown Thu Aug 14 18:39:30 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#38171 <38171@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#38171 <38171@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? Reply-To: bug#38171 <38171@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 01:39:30 +0000 retitle 38171 guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? reassign 38171 guix submitter 38171 Bengt Richter severity 38171 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 11 16:08:53 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2019 21:08:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56070 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUGvc-00039h-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:08:53 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38027) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUGvb-00039a-Lc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:08:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55153) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUGva-0002f2-6G for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:08:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUGvY-00071q-EU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:08:49 -0500 Received: from imta-38.everyone.net ([216.200.145.38]:57164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUGvY-000718-65 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:08:48 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (omta003.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xABL5gbm022081 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:08:45 -0800 X-Eon-Originating-Account: 52xBNyeCsRGTiyYJIfkG7W6UtARAGQH6N_3YS1IuBds X-Eon-Dm: m0116293.ppops.net Received: by m0116293.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 32d0d199) id m0116293.5dc217be.179885 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:08:42 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJdyc3ak146NgIAAAAB,5ce30b2c21695ff87d7640e5ef167d09 X-Eip: 2LUyeJDFreKN3QzQOf-AXLA3IJE-5-cW-ciCIAHjj-Q Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:08:33 -0800 From: Bengt Richter To: New-Bug Subject: guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? Message-ID: <20191111210833.GA128109@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-11_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1910280000 definitions=main-1911110185 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 216.200.145.38 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) Hi Guix, Sorry about the vterm escapes, but perhaps it's easy to see for someone anyway? Both lynxes started and both use the same lynx.cfg and lynx.lss in /etc/. I selected a bookmark link to duckduckgo and /usr/bin/lynx got there, but guix lynx did not. Either way, I just exited lynx, so make the strace as small as possible. The first lines from the greps show a TLS difference -- (why? different internal defaults?) and is that the explanation? Can I fix it with /etc/lynx.cfg? guix describe: Generation 22 Nov 08 2019 17:49:27 (current) guix be4f2d9 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: be4f2d9451344701599b6dc000c0345ce53b2128 The respective lynxes: /gnu/store/7vwm0ly476k7p2spbwxsqr2p7khg69yc-lynx-2.8.9rel.1/bin/lynx: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, not stripped /usr/bin/lynx: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=9a1efceaaead8942151b0719125d63cbd4e296cf, stripped Results: --8<----(guix lynx)-----------cut here---------------start------------->8--- [12:07 ~/bs]$ egrep -E '(Alert|TLS|HTTP)' lynx-gx.strace 122385 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mSecure 256-bit TLS1.3 (ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) HTTP co"..., 91) = 91 122385 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mnding HTTP request.\33[K", 42) = 42 122385 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mHTTP request sent; w", 40) = 40 122385 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[41mAlert!: Unexpected network read error; connection aborted.\33["..., 81) = 81 122385 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[41mAlert!: Unable to access document.\33[K", 57) = 57 --8<----(guix lynx)-----------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --8<----(ArchLinux lynx)-----------cut here---------------start------------->8--- [12:07 ~/bs]$ egrep -E '(Alert|TLS|HTTP)' lynx-usr.strace 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mSecure 256-bit TLSv1.3 (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) HTTP connect"..., 86) = 86 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mnding HTTP request.", 39) = 39 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mHTTP request sent; w", 40) = 40 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mHTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily", 50) = 50 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mSecure 256-bit TLSv1.3 (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) HTTP connect"..., 86) = 86 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mnding HTTP request.", 39) = 39 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mHTTP request sent; w", 40) = 40 122308 write(1, "\33[0;10;1m\17\33[33m\33[44mHTTP/1.1 200 OK\33[K", 38) = 38 --8<----(ArchLinux lynx)-----------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --8<----(strace cmds)-----------cut here---------------start------------->8--- [12:07 ~/bs]$ # above from: strace -s 80 -yfo lynx-gx.strace lynx [12:15 ~/bs]$ # and: strace -s 80 -yfo lynx-usr.strace /usr/bin/lynx --8<----(strace cmds)-----------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I've got the whole strace logs still, in case you want me to grep out something more. TIA -- Regards, Bengt Richter From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 11 19:06:00 2019 Received: (at 38171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2019 00:06:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56124 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJgx-00030x-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:06:00 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:55296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJgs-00030g-0j for 38171@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:05:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b11so1152477wmb.5 for <38171@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:05:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=UNIoou7tk5IJ+PS0ISG0+NaeWWDMkdmjvmb4pSRKYog=; b=s7bVAFqsipZNo7hG5VL3uQCbqsC9NvRm+rEjm+EbgjXT8aOKZwkhjkZeQ/+7ZGkxXD 0fsGG1QfoAMtE43gUGnaPW61QT8h3xBuHEDUefPcH8tYVxN5u2lYXW7GvvoA4TtNX+2g +ZC7Ai4RfyTVL9OQQCOLU0UCus9fInDJoszlz94pjnBCaNgYxODaan8uR/9zUh7Tuu3l FRFLi72uLX/jYBqtcXsR6Ns6b5tTXH1CdHreRPe3PhjTzbh2BgOiLjDqMA/Y/X9a7zEC D0vkQPUwt9A56barIdfOCofJ99bQGj/Kg09N2Fg40AL2fB0OF/x94RguYHpPXzbYiDie JIuA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKhn9lajKodNchR9FW9YPKm0lvEKA7SXJGXieKqqd/FR8TpoqB 0pjHL4ArayRKBwf1/kw1Ew+UlzxL X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoZTqvJ9J8HZCiiPutrBKP4FTFH2+7eZRS+bNVv9LX/NUr+srJY69e/6m2lNxUSGOAu9itpg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5415:: with SMTP id i21mr1387532wmb.120.1573517143889; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:05:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodion ([2a01:e35:8bf7:6530:dd52:e529:7f34:2d5c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v128sm2319038wmb.14.2019.11.11.16.05.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:05:42 -0800 (PST) From: clement@lassieur.org (=?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur) To: Bengt Richter Subject: Re: bug#38171: guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? References: <20191111210833.GA128109@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 01:05:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191111210833.GA128109@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> (Bengt Richter's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:08:33 -0800") Message-ID: <87imnqyn56.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38171 Cc: 38171@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bengt, Thank you for the report! It seems to be a GnuTLS issue with TLS 1.3 hosts[1]. There is patch upstream but it hasn't landed in a release yet, so I think it's safer to switch to OpenSSL. What do you think? I attached a patch doing just that. Cheers, Cl=C3=A9ment [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lynx-dev/2018-12/msg00009.html --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-gnu-lynx-Fix-errors-with-TLS-1.3-hosts.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >From 83523b25d10f5fc42473dbfb93e5ee3c29e23b88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Cl=3DC3=3DA9ment=3D20Lassieur?=3D Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:38:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix errors with TLS 1.3 hosts. Fixes . Reported by Bengt Richter . See . * gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm (lynx)[inputs, arguments]: Replace GnuTLS w= ith OpenSSL. --- gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm b/gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm index 1b41aec874..24531623c6 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2018 Rutger Helling ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2018 Timo Eisenmann ;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2018 Pierre Neidhardt +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2019 Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ and the GTK+ toolkit.") ("perl" ,perl))) (inputs `(("ncurses" ,ncurses) ("libidn" ,libidn) - ("gnutls" ,gnutls) + ("openssl" ,openssl) ("libgcrypt" ,libgcrypt) ("unzip" ,unzip) ("zlib" ,zlib) @@ -230,12 +231,12 @@ and the GTK+ toolkit.") ("bzip2" ,bzip2))) (arguments `(#:configure-flags - (let ((gnutls (assoc-ref %build-inputs "gnutls"))) + (let ((openssl (assoc-ref %build-inputs "openssl"))) `("--with-pkg-config" "--with-screen=3Dncurses" "--with-zlib" "--with-bzlib" - ,(string-append "--with-gnutls=3D" gnutls) + ,(string-append "--with-ssl=3D" openssl) ;; "--with-socks5" ; XXX TODO "--enable-widec" "--enable-ascii-ctypes" --=20 2.23.0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 12 12:47:37 2019 Received: (at 38171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2019 17:47:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58326 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUaGP-0005of-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:47:37 -0500 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:44371) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUaGO-0005oR-Cy for 38171@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:47:36 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A91665D; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:47:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:47:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=3zbKorfqEGOzv+WYLvheF2uBgvd6bCQzDnGUymYp4yk=; b=SjTNt+u6CpmD o7bEWmaTR8APMJOw5dyRgd0drQ0Df1E/nGYqsTfLlYwZad0an5mYjicW9EjVndCt mz+UGoEzzpL2bfkU9/P+6Cq7e3It5bQGV3l8UTMWYKm4SzlHew169xoU2ChGs3wM ApIpHaRY7CvdsydstaMATZYXDsdZ5ds= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3zbKorfqEGOzv+WYLvheF2uBgvd6bCQzDnGUymYp4 yk=; b=oUNIjFNmNMPAcElOcchQ5bX/1FxtlTBlbJ81GkgBQCSccX3ymaIanNQbc O2WrT4bGMN/x2DhM3yLEs3/nO2QH4isSAyZnMEDuIDBUFDgvt5/WjiSMyHlizzd0 PWjkZ5uUtqHKnzWuOR7NTaUkY3bUtW4uR5PEaav6A4eXHmOFbuOYm/Ay1Sf+JDyB Z+MVCbhnwX1DDJB/ZKlK4lPR70GiAhsR1/2sXS2VboFnV0LZBiAcqJz1vL5HeBYr tARenumqgh3U7sCSZ/2sB+X5THoaaFpev3vuH8330RNuXRB9hyVVQhzZ4bUx4ETM QXN5dPLhRSlLZiBWY/Dd1yQw953Sg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddvledguddtiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjfgesthekredttderudenucfhrhhomhepnfgv ohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecukfhppe ejiedruddvgedrudefkedrieefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehf rghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 82A8F8005C; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:47:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:47:23 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: bug#38171: guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? Message-ID: <20191112174723.GB25397@jasmine.lan> References: <20191111210833.GA128109@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <87imnqyn56.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87imnqyn56.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38171 Cc: Bengt Richter , 38171@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 01:05:41AM +0100, Clément Lassieur wrote: > Hi Bengt, > > Thank you for the report! > > It seems to be a GnuTLS issue with TLS 1.3 hosts[1]. There is patch > upstream but it hasn't landed in a release yet, so I think it's safer to > switch to OpenSSL. What do you think? I attached a patch doing just > that. Can you double-check that the licenses of Lynx and OpenSSL are compatible for redistribution? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 12 13:23:32 2019 Received: (at 38171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2019 18:23:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUap9-0006jo-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:23:31 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com ([209.85.128.48]:53385) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUap5-0006jV-1z for 38171@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:23:30 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id u18so4324999wmc.3 for <38171@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:23:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=8f97ZOcRaNCp8aLPgXlX9lbJnCqJWwAvoAVqTkWoj88=; b=NarI8t2uxwSyU4h5GnnmCpyda0BUzEaPdGK4JGGzckshPRqDWIb/d30h8TsL3SGMzG QqYptxXxScePbBWSeD+Cjzts9XywqVHNEJHiEzpMX7FNWZ3rIGKtvbu1nNVkqG8yB+Ts 3nPYXsocmfB4OcyJjrkCi6qc8rLmO+EflbkmcZKWs1Ck0XkbztHFfDwTZmWQ3HbyBJOp PkzD7Xu+JgidHRewwxCarKYSzS/aywPMFjC9TaxjBHQ8iOnRIP3ylLdJS5sCsePzobtD NXDEvqiEW4aGRAc2TIQHiqFPGoqseNs0yIguVOI8bjqcNh29AYQWVUpm0q2mthvW2Z1H QMLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1mNPQH3m+sZoh2Ix8wVz6HZ36VumFyMX9EkRTYeYoRQtKY3Zd UrdIcbqTtUlybXyxfhQyAtzL9e+K X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxGfZ7WeKxot6d1apbpfXi7PY3pluK0Eyt82dKPeeU/9ZsSgRZEGhsgONtK4ravXBbraywh/g== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f20c:: with SMTP id s12mr4883435wmc.37.1573582998442; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:23:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz. [62.23.167.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y78sm5804065wmd.32.2019.11.12.10.23.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:23:17 -0800 (PST) References: <20191111210833.GA128109@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <87imnqyn56.fsf@lassieur.org> <20191112174723.GB25397@jasmine.lan> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#38171: guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? In-reply-to: <20191112174723.GB25397@jasmine.lan> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 19:23:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87k185q7ho.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 4.0 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Leo Famulari writes: > Can you double-check that the licenses of Lynx and OpenSSL are > compatible for redistribution? https://lynx.invisible-island.net/current/README.ssl says: Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: openssl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [62.23.167.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.48 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38171 Cc: Bengt Richter , 38171@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Leo Famulari writes: > Can you double-check that the licenses of Lynx and OpenSSL are > compatible for redistribution? https://lynx.invisible-island.net/current/README.ssl says: Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: invisible-island.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.48 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [62.23.167.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Leo Famulari writes: > Can you double-check that the licenses of Lynx and OpenSSL are > compatible for redistribution? https://lynx.invisible-island.net/current/README.ssl says: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- OpenSSL's distribution and use may be restricted by licenses and laws. For information on obtaining OpenSSL, as well as information on its distribution, see http://www.openssl.org/ --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and https://www.openssl.org/docs/faq.html says: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software? On many systems including the major Linux and BSD distributions, yes (the GPL does not place restrictions on using libraries that are part of the normal operating system distribution). On other systems, the situation is less clear. Some GPL software copyright holders claim that you infringe on their rights if you use OpenSSL with their software on operating systems that don't normally include OpenSSL. If you develop open source software that uses OpenSSL, you may find it useful to choose an other license than the GPL, or state explicitly that "This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is allowed." If you are using GPL software developed by others, you may want to ask the copyright holder for permission to use their software with OpenSSL. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- If Guix is one of the major Linux distributions (as I think it is), Lynx and OpenSSL are compatible as per OpenSSL's site (first paragraph). In any case, Lynx's README.ssl makes it clear that they have nothing against OpenSSL use. (It even says GnuTLS support is experimental.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 13 12:08:54 2019 Received: (at 38171-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2019 17:08:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUw8U-0001CU-KD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:08:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:42509) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUw8Q-0001CG-QH for 38171-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:08:51 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a15so3247464wrf.9 for <38171-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:08:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZN4sQz1V4m7IOdrW9MvSg/XbodSc/DiQBGCgF0P6Kzk=; b=NH/8sGeR8dTyFdvzip/aLJ/50dOYzVNqu2FYFf9h+VBHP7qQPtLoTc3U1j9DoBskJR 1Qe7Ij9B045a2eb8C7RRSbkbqaNm5QnG/mTrmDISC5gPrwiVHuFKI892Jvpykx+uJbYM w/xAHal0WQvCWuaXq8vUoLTym+H3K8LtGlNiuD1WqkDppVjTE921wrO1JktDms0N7cna jfN44uWv+fwgfUkzjaWGoJuhyheFBONM8DfjXOXOmUYf9NAxaJMsG6rUyfOlWM6nBNxO glMxSwUgVQTMHaYvwJvE139HsEsDyf/P5qv+5/ya9YJNVeh+gh57HvsqBX/M9UxfLCb7 aVgg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUPbxBxLPy/WUzd774iqt3pCnN2a5xObOp/HnvX0oLFlEoMu0vz 18kxURH1b9a2i8i9OFeTd0XtcCcF X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxNwTFsFuD4VAOCG/HVJLKh+SbLSLvAuToHO36pmEYeeSUNZCGE5RyV+mbta38iRuUumjGjgw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6585:: with SMTP id q5mr1505072wru.158.1573664924608; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz. [62.23.167.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm2898789wmj.12.2019.11.13.09.08.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:08:43 -0800 (PST) References: <20191111210833.GA128109@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <87imnqyn56.fsf@lassieur.org> <20191112174723.GB25397@jasmine.lan> <87k185q7ho.fsf@lassieur.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: Bengt Richter Subject: Re: bug#38171: guix lynx can not connect, ArchLinux lynx can, why? In-reply-to: <87k185q7ho.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:08:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9rnemas.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 4.0 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pushed. Bengt, you can 'guix pull', it should work now :) Clément Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [62.23.167.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.43 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38171-done Cc: 38171-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pushed. Bengt, you can 'guix pull', it should work now :) Clément Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.43 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [62.23.167.188 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.lassieur[at]gmail.com) 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Pushed. Bengt, you can 'guix pull', it should work now :) Cl=C3=A9ment From unknown Thu Aug 14 18:39:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator