Subject: bug#38154: Man-follow-manual-reference could be as sharp as M-x man itself

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:59:16 +0800

>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
>> From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
>> <[email-masked]>
>> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:18:27 +0800
>> 
>> Sure, I'll tell the authors to use
>> 
>> SEE ALSO
>> v.segment(1grass), v.split(1grass), v.to.rast(1grass), v.to.db(1grass)
>> 
>> but in the meantime, Man-follow-manual-reference should be beefed up...

EZ> FWIW, I'm not at all sure.  It's an invalid man page (a.k.a. "bug"),
EZ> so why should we support it?

It's even the way these document pros make their man pages:

$ man perldoc

SEE ALSO
       perlpod, Pod::Perldoc