GNU bug report logs - #38115
[PATCH] gnu: Add dpf-plugins.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Alexandros Theodotou <alex <at> zrythm.org>

Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:59:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alexandros Theodotou <alex <at> zrythm.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>, 38115 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#38115] [PATCH] gnu: Add dpf-plugins.
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 04:48:51 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> > +    (arguments
> > +     `(#:tests? #f  ; no "check" target
> > +       #:make-flags
> > +       (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))
> > +       #:phases
> > +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
> > +         (add-after 'unpack 'skip-dssi-binaries
> > +           (lambda _
> > +             (substitute* "Makefile"
> > +                          (("cp -r bin.*-dssi.*$") ":;\n"))
> > +             #t))
> 
> Can you expand on this comment?  What are these binaries, and why do
> we
> need to prevent them from being installed?
I was having trouble building them, but I managed to get them building
now (was missing liblo). Removed this part

> 
> > +    (license `(license:isc license:gpl3 license:lgpl3 license:mit 
> > license:gpl2))))
> 
> Does this work?  I would expect each of the license entries to have
> to
> be 'unquoted', i.e. `(,license:isc).  Alternatively you can use (list
> ...) here.
> 
> When a package has multiple licenses like here, please add a comment
> about it.  Is there a "main" license, (roughly) which files are under
> what license?
Fixed and added more info
[0001-gnu-Add-dpf-plugins.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 190 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.