GNU bug report logs - #38110
[PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust@1.29.0 directly from mrustc@0.9.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Subject: bug#38110: closed (Re: bug#38110: [PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap
 rust <at> 1.29.0 directly from mrustc <at> 0.9.)
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:59:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#38110: [PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 directly from mrustc <at> 0.9.

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 38110 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
38110: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38110
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>, 38110-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38110: [PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 directly from
 mrustc <at> 0.9.
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:58:13 -0500

Hello,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hello Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Marius,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 23:16:07 +0100
>>> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > Building rust, I get a texinfo build failure:
>>>
>>>> How are you building Rust?  I've only used the Guix package definition
>>>> and did not get as far as actually running the test suite.  Do you have
>>>> an updated build script?
>>>
>>> It's failing in texinfo, not in rust.
>>
>> Oh right, sorry for the confusion.
>>
>>> Also, on my laptop, it's not failing in texinfo.  So I guess it has
>>> something to do with bayfront or the machines it offloads to.
>>
>> I haven't seen this in the countless times I've built core-updates over
>> the last few months, nor on Berlin.  I suspect it has to do with
>> parallelism; can you see if #:parallel-tests? #f makes a difference?
>>
>> You should be able to grab a Texinfo substitute from ci.guix.gnu.org
>> though.
>
> I don't recall how close or how far it was from actually building, but
> attached is a modified version of Danny's patch I was working on, that
> applies to current core-updates:
>
>
>
> Perhaps it can be useful.
>
> Maxim

I ended up pushing a heavily modified version of the original patch from
Danny, as commit df93fc21a4 on core-updates.

Closing.

Thank you!

Maxim

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 directly from mrustc <at> 0.9.
Date: Thu,  7 Nov 2019 23:27:56 +0100

Danny Milosavljevic (2):
  gnu: mrustc: Update to 0.9.
  gnu: rust: Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 from mrustc.

 gnu/local.mk                                  |   1 -
 ...ix-variable-length-integer-receiving.patch |  15 -
 gnu/packages/rust.scm                         | 494 ++++--------------
 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 405 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/mrustc-0.8.0-fix-variable-length-integer-receiving.patch

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.