GNU bug report logs -
#38110
[PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust@1.29.0 directly from mrustc@0.9.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:58:13 -0500
with message-id <87czxeo92y.fsf_-_ <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#38110: [PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 directly from mrustc <at> 0.9.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38110,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 directly from mrustc <at> 0.9.
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
38110: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38110
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Danny Milosavljevic (2):
gnu: mrustc: Update to 0.9.
gnu: rust: Bootstrap rust <at> 1.29.0 from mrustc.
gnu/local.mk | 1 -
...ix-variable-length-integer-receiving.patch | 15 -
gnu/packages/rust.scm | 494 ++++--------------
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 405 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/mrustc-0.8.0-fix-variable-length-integer-receiving.patch
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hello Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Marius,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 23:16:07 +0100
>>> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > Building rust, I get a texinfo build failure:
>>>
>>>> How are you building Rust? I've only used the Guix package definition
>>>> and did not get as far as actually running the test suite. Do you have
>>>> an updated build script?
>>>
>>> It's failing in texinfo, not in rust.
>>
>> Oh right, sorry for the confusion.
>>
>>> Also, on my laptop, it's not failing in texinfo. So I guess it has
>>> something to do with bayfront or the machines it offloads to.
>>
>> I haven't seen this in the countless times I've built core-updates over
>> the last few months, nor on Berlin. I suspect it has to do with
>> parallelism; can you see if #:parallel-tests? #f makes a difference?
>>
>> You should be able to grab a Texinfo substitute from ci.guix.gnu.org
>> though.
>
> I don't recall how close or how far it was from actually building, but
> attached is a modified version of Danny's patch I was working on, that
> applies to current core-updates:
>
>
>
> Perhaps it can be useful.
>
> Maxim
I ended up pushing a heavily modified version of the original patch from
Danny, as commit df93fc21a4 on core-updates.
Closing.
Thank you!
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 161 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.