GNU bug report logs - #38086
RAID installation script with ‘mdadm’ no longer works

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:14:02 UTC

Severity: important

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 38086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with ‘mdadm’ no longer works
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:42:53 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 2019-11-12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>> + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=stripe --raid-devices=2
>>> /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3
>>> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K
>>> mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata
>>> [   13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with
>>> default_layout setting
>>> [   13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2
>>> [   13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ...
>>> mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524
>>> [   13.901603] md: md0 stopped.
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>> Anyone knows what it takes to “set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2”?
>>>
>>
>> On kernel 5.3.4 and above the
>> raid0.default_layout=2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We should
>> generate our grub configuration accordingly.

So, this might be sort of a tangent, but I'm wondering why you're
testing raid0 (striping, for performance+capacity at risk of data loss)
instead of raid1 (mirroring, for redundancy, fast reads, slow writes,
half capacity of storage), or another raid level with more disks (raid5,
raid6, raid10). raid1 would be the simplest to switch the code to, since
it uses only two disks.


The issue triggering this bug might be a non-issue on other raid levels
that in my mind might make more sense for rootfs. Or maybe people have
use-casese for rootfs on raid0 that I'm too uncreative to think of? :)


live well,
  vagrant
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 210 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.