From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: andreas@enge.fr, bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 10:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-Guix@gnu.org Cc: Andreas Enge X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Andreas Enge Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157303519920468 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 10:14:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2019 10:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJT-0005K3-1T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJQ-0005Jv-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJP-0008If-PZ for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJP-0002Wk-J5 for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:15 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51624 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJO-0001yY-T2 for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:15 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Brumaire an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:13:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Looks like our RAID installation method no longer works, as can be seen at : --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- + guix --version guix (GNU Guix) c4de60ac3c6aa5b46519011af89988215c347e9e Copyright (C) 2019 the Guix authors License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. + export GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts + GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts + parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M mkpart pri= mary ext2 3M 600M mkpart primary ext2 600M 1200M set 1 boot on set 1 bios_g= rub on + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices=3D2 /de= v/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata [ 13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with default_= layout setting [ 13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2 [ 13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ... mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524 [ 13.901603] md: md0 stopped. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2= =E2=80=9D? We should then update (gnu tests install) and the manual accordingly. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-Guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157303848825833 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:09:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2019 11:08:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39513 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSJAW-0006iZ-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:08:08 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39364) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSJAU-0006iR-Fg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:08:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSJAS-0005Ub-RL for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:08:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSJAR-0001b1-90 for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:08:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]:46633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSJAG-0001KD-0k; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:07:52 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id x11so8909417eds.13; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 03:07:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zJDSm8SoqdYoHiQUKVI4xNrGhWfMhsj07b6PoKrLP9Y=; b=geQHzhCcDkDaA1VD/7LzQXOkJw0zA8fjDcupFdjb7iSYqQGxt7nYRG8GI7w5E1EknD iV3XTfpPXZNglzBI4EVADuFNdrKi2nIyEj4jcyoAwnGePTp2yKaeupktraUrHVwOh01D caZZJTTv4kWmIkKO13Kg2E9/TrwwdgputJuB0eCO2FQZX92eYR9wyrSfhewoC6uUC43+ fnkc1PzOkBiB7lajKOTrgHTwpugI4Zj6+lHAEvi8dglavQaXS8BmVxeD2ptScRqTN0IE jFDmd2Kp69Mkva5d2/U84amjh4L0QDvfr+ompBa/b8buU2dCUXi6YOyvvuBmLDG2tKUL Yphg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zJDSm8SoqdYoHiQUKVI4xNrGhWfMhsj07b6PoKrLP9Y=; b=b3iKVNLCRoQWQqlG1PgpdJiAxXMz97f8Tf/AoVxIac0r5leoE3njvLLvz66aa2Z8gi x06ry1aET0u1O36bhwlVJrDw41glhlTON7+uYvp/LGmUmlFq8k9LXJ5WtdbjKtlNBo7T hLCh80yPci+QlEwNUghg9v7zG1swdyzdHBZVzZIZoipjyAQ/DdzZ0fZYv+qY5bfD0kml AqibqX1WHHHPuANELqEv9YiIkCTmD5qC1wiWJ+kuBxhd/F/jTr8ITgoPFB/V+m4eD5sm Y1m8qcekXNYas+XBsqw8nHfcZSafsVZKmo430oenHagYxRJGfufflZsFFxJrD7JMhgKM LkYw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgWhq9tXKXIoNU51VLUqYD+NroEBq78vV2UN0XSpDti0+OQTY/ vuu3eEEKEMZYqRd4LIU5UvB15LlKQLAeqILDdmmwJZLV6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyPw2Ku4E0XFT1Ygo2MukeKn/Y/wduzPnwE/4ZE7vbVCFR7N0Xl8/hHfIjuunEeGeHJdh6Otc/Ap+NWKUVUsfg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:524b:: with SMTP id y11mr33438865ejm.82.1573038470496; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 03:07:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:07:39 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004085af0596ab8f70" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::52e X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --0000000000004085af0596ab8f70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludo, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. nov.= 6., Sze, 11:14): > Hello, > > Looks like our RAID installation method no longer works, as can be seen > at : > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > + guix --version > guix (GNU Guix) c4de60ac3c6aa5b46519011af89988215c347e9e > Copyright (C) 2019 the Guix authors > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > + export GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts > + GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts > + parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M mkpart > primary ext2 3M 600M mkpart primary ext2 600M 1200M set 1 boot on set 1 > bios_grub on > + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices=3D2 > /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 > mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K > mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata > [ 13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with > default_layout setting > [ 13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2 > [ 13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ... > mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524 > [ 13.901603] md: md0 stopped. > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2= =E2=80=9D? > On kernel 5.3.4 and above the raid0.default_layout=3D2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We should generate our grub configuration accordingly. See this for reference: https://blog.icod.de/2019/10/10/caution-kernel-5-3-4-and-raid0-default_layo= ut/ > We should then update (gnu tests install) and the manual accordingly. > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. > Best regards, g_bor --=20 OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21 --0000000000004085af0596ab8f70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Ludo,


Ludo= vic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> e= zt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. nov. 6., Sze, 11:14):
Hello,

Looks like our RAID installation method no longer works, as can be seen
at <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1906208/details>:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
+ guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) c4de60ac3c6aa5b46519011af89988215c347e9e
Copyright (C) 2019 the Guix authors
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licens= es/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
+ export GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts
+ GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts
+ parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M mkpart pri= mary ext2 3M 600M mkpart primary ext2 600M 1200M set 1 boot on set 1 bios_g= rub on
+ mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices=3D2 /de= v/vdb2 /dev/vdb3
mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K
mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata
[=C2=A0 =C2=A013.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 wit= h default_layout setting
[=C2=A0 =C2=A013.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or = 2
[=C2=A0 =C2=A013.896000] md: pers->run() failed ...
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524
[=C2=A0 =C2=A013.901603] md: md0 stopped.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2= =E2=80=9D?

On kernel 5.3.4 and above th= e
raid0.default_layout=3D2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We should= generate our grub configuration accordingly.


We should then update (gnu tests install) and the manual accordingly.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
Best regards,
g_bor

--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:= A96C:CF63:0B21
--0000000000004085af0596ab8f70-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.1573514948729 (code B ref 38086); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 23:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2019 23:29:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7M-0000Bh-DJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37061) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7K-0000BD-Dy for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:06 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7F-0008Ss-7T; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:01 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=43704 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7E-0004PS-D4; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:00 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:28:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:07:39 +0100") Message-ID: <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi G=C3=A1bor, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: >> + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices=3D2 >> /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 >> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K >> mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata >> [ 13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with >> default_layout setting >> [ 13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2 >> [ 13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ... >> mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524 >> [ 13.901603] md: md0 stopped. >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 or = 2=E2=80=9D? >> > > On kernel 5.3.4 and above the > raid0.default_layout=3D2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We should > generate our grub configuration accordingly. That=E2=80=99s part of the solution, thank you! With the patch below, the =E2=80=9Craid-root-os=E2=80=9D test successfully = installs the system to a RAID0 device, but then that system fails to boot with: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Booting from Hard Disk... GRUB loading. Welcome to GRUB! error: invalid arch-independent ELF magic. Entering rescue mode... --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (It sits there forever.) Are we missing something in =E2=80=98grub.cfg=E2=80=99? If so, I wonder if= that problem arose with the upgrade in commit 069ab3bbfde704760acaca20dff8a29d167c6be5. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/gnu/tests/install.scm b/gnu/tests/install.scm index 22c9554705..5e421f7c54 100644 --- a/gnu/tests/install.scm +++ b/gnu/tests/install.scm @@ -543,7 +543,8 @@ where /gnu lives on a separate partition.") (bootloader (bootloader-configuration (bootloader grub-bootloader) (target "/dev/vdb"))) - (kernel-arguments '("console=ttyS0")) + (kernel-arguments '("console=ttyS0" + "raid0.default_layout=2")) ;; Add a kernel module for RAID-0 (aka. "stripe"). (initrd-modules (cons "raid0" %base-initrd-modules)) @@ -578,9 +579,11 @@ export GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=--no-grafts parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt \\ mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M \\ mkpart primary ext2 3M 600M \\ - mkpart primary ext2 600M 1200M \\ + mkpart primary ext2 600M 1.4G \\ set 1 boot on \\ set 1 bios_grub on +modprobe raid0 +echo 1 > /sys/module/raid0/parameters/default_layout mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=stripe --raid-devices=2 \\ /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 mkfs.ext4 -L root-fs /dev/md0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 11 18:29:19 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2019 23:29:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7X-0000C7-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7V-0000Bu-SD for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:18 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7Q-0008Vy-OZ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:12 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=43710 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iUJ7Q-0005OL-36 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:29:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:29:10 +0100 Message-Id: <875zjqm1q1.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #38086 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) severity 38086 important quit From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 18:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.1574447457333 (code B ref 38086); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 18:31:01 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2019 18:30:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55482 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYDhn-00005H-FK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:30:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58887) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iYDhk-000051-52 for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:30:54 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iYDhe-00008s-Vq; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:30:47 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=59824 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iYDhe-0000RR-75; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:30:46 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:30:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:28:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87zhgn7oh8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) An update: this is the last known good test: https://berlin.guixsd.org/build/1793057/details and this is the first known-bad (=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99 failing with =E2= =80=9Ccannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 without default_layout setting=E2=80=9D): https://berlin.guixsd.org/build/1795351/details We have to resort to an ungly hack to get the evaluation number and corresponding commit of each build because they aren=E2=80=99t accessible o= ver HTTP (which is unfortunate!): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- sqlite> select * from builds where rowid =3D 1793057; /gnu/store/618hm2w0clcrxz16yww846mgqdc1l4s0-raid-root-os.drv|7863|test.raid= -root-os.i686-linux|i686-linux|raid-root-os||0|1570439988|1570459635|157045= 9744 sqlite> select * from checkouts where evaluation =3D 7863; guix-master|7b6a8e23b0de18262a42e44432f955517d71d796|7863|guix|/gnu/store/7= sd2lwj83n6kyn66p9bdgs5yvzqnl539-guix-7b6a8e2 sqlite> select * from builds where rowid =3D 1795351; /gnu/store/qskl45gw9y9hd8qp7s5451d53pvpc60q-raid-root-os.drv|7867|test.raid= -root-os.i686-linux|i686-linux|raid-root-os||2|1570440409|0|1570457622 sqlite> select * from checkouts where evaluation =3D 7867; guix-master|7d82e920717f08bceb42bb570d786dff233171e1|7867|guix|/gnu/store/b= 2cq9zhdsz4qri2xkg3rgwmyri0wyxxb-guix-7d82e92 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So the commit that introduced the change of behavior of =E2=80=98mdadm=E2= =80=99 is: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 7d82e920717f08bceb42bb570d786dff233171e1 Date: Sun Oct 6 06:07:15 2019 +0000 gnu: linux-libre: Update to 5.3.4. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- And indeed that brings us back to: https://blog.icod.de/2019/10/10/caution-kernel-5-3-4-and-raid0-default_la= yout/ Hmm alright, nothing new here. Oh well! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Vagrant Cascadian Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.157930098410359 (code B ref 38086); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2020 22:43:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isaKW-0002h1-DY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:43:04 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:57388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isaKU-0002gV-LL for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:43:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:21:21:0:100b]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6E171AA50; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:42:56 -0800 (PST) From: Vagrant Cascadian In-Reply-To: <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:42:53 -0800 Message-ID: <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2019-11-12, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > >>> + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices=3D2 >>> /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 >>> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K >>> mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata >>> [ 13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with >>> default_layout setting >>> [ 13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2 >>> [ 13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ... >>> mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524 >>> [ 13.901603] md: md0 stopped. >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>> >>> Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 or= 2=E2=80=9D? >>> >> >> On kernel 5.3.4 and above the >> raid0.default_layout=3D2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We should >> generate our grub configuration accordingly. So, this might be sort of a tangent, but I'm wondering why you're testing raid0 (striping, for performance+capacity at risk of data loss) instead of raid1 (mirroring, for redundancy, fast reads, slow writes, half capacity of storage), or another raid level with more disks (raid5, raid6, raid10). raid1 would be the simplest to switch the code to, since it uses only two disks. The issue triggering this bug might be a non-issue on other raid levels that in my mind might make more sense for rootfs. Or maybe people have use-casese for rootfs on raid0 that I'm too uncreative to think of? :) live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCXiI4bQAKCRDcUY/If5cW qg6tAQDnN10yIpC58DKd2sEfmoNP7PAa65iyqNRVlZY6Kns59gD+NAGhQ31f2ohL a0EAa2MrsGqlFocle4vjk1sW9T88IQA= =bcKG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.157935422626671 (code B ref 38086); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2020 13:30:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isoBB-0006vt-Sy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 08:30:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com ([209.85.208.45]:42498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isoB4-0006vT-WC for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 08:30:21 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id e10so25010523edv.9 for <38086@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 05:30:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MWAVprxwpqCyXv/9Hoz3lg+gCVytzLdaWQyE0puVhgk=; b=OZFsvKJ2bj65AALTRLLyzj5iI9E7u6R88pRnH7cHvaPNUlv90zTDQKbTfJo6wZg1DR d5W2lMp2iZ6en92tqUwZTTbp1rymOBfKs5EvJ3tQBJORUoUZI1UNzw8riaSuy7aTqmCo GpmTMgG30ZW6jeIpSukGE6VT01S+5bIoqm7ip9HuOMDB9n+OyPNJMKGWQuCO6txNtscB TA6eLXa3RAh13zKe1Zku6MluW7YgJs0AR6MVF1V4Nz6mNadYC/Auv94YO8MskVSm5NPK mOPwpiyYnZdVVkeyDkzIzdvUYUYxJgz1RQ+pZa+Wsq6Pch/LRIt3CFLu+ColApU1mkbg XGCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MWAVprxwpqCyXv/9Hoz3lg+gCVytzLdaWQyE0puVhgk=; b=HaoNcjZFtmHjNDPDC1P4ETSPrc2vMWf3Eib08nlaLefZv89Es+jq/XEg/3/WBuijGb 0ZuYoq6RGNELP0u3Q3QGf0V2Z9VY/L9lbIPJy9u/z9oWRDWCuzo8Aym5mwLDXIpTcE7m QjP7yWOUs4snIW/QSkGNCvx9S5cm06tHLN0OzFwzP7y9Hqo0OiKVPnRu2Sm3zCPk8hav vsy45XDDVUOYQ+uGJeBMDVYrrkQm4pOtisXG6iJO/VncivxRbiaj0fcBbBvRJP4pFqND Y4abr7GCKAdCZooNbCFWms/2olkQqEqrcfCnUTrEuyAEipCmhNPHf7PlN0OYwhgaFqRD II5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXZvgdCKSTZMkl28wC5E6sruLnBuN9b7lh0SF/+/aqf0xBGDgqv JdZwOLEtAs0DltYAJw31hzgikzjBQtvZrvfuzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznQFEybXxyKiignR6LKx9B8DH3WpGlr7fRXP4k8+e5RxKsLOR4pT5I8GDM4l35mF702OGNR0tPVc8trxph6ug= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1314:: with SMTP id w20mr3907859ejb.331.1579354209078; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 05:30:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> In-Reply-To: <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 14:29:56 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b560b059c6a0efb" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000009b560b059c6a0efb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vagrant Cascadian ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2020. j= an. 17., P=C3=A9n 23:42): > On 2019-11-12, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > > > >>> + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices= =3D2 > >>> /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 > >>> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K > >>> mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata > >>> [ 13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with > >>> default_layout setting > >>> [ 13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2 > >>> [ 13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ... > >>> mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524 > >>> [ 13.901603] md: md0 stopped. > >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > >>> > >>> Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 = or 2=E2=80=9D? > >>> > >> > >> On kernel 5.3.4 and above the > >> raid0.default_layout=3D2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We should > >> generate our grub configuration accordingly. > > So, this might be sort of a tangent, but I'm wondering why you're > testing raid0 (striping, for performance+capacity at risk of data loss) > instead of raid1 (mirroring, for redundancy, fast reads, slow writes, > half capacity of storage), or another raid level with more disks (raid5, > raid6, raid10). raid1 would be the simplest to switch the code to, since > it uses only two disks. > > > The issue triggering this bug might be a non-issue on other raid levels > that in my mind might make more sense for rootfs. Or maybe people have > use-casese for rootfs on raid0 that I'm too uncreative to think of? :) > I often see raid 10 as root. I believe it might make sense to test that setup. > > > live well, > vagrant > --0000000000009b560b059c6a0efb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2020. jan. 17= ., P=C3=A9n 23:42):
On 2019-11-12, = Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>> + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-de= vices=3D2
>>> /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3
>>> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K
>>> mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata
>>> [=C2=A0 =C2=A013.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-z= one RAID0 with
>>> default_layout setting
>>> [=C2=A0 =C2=A013.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_la= yout to 1 or 2
>>> [=C2=A0 =C2=A013.896000] md: pers->run() failed ...
>>> mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524
>>> [=C2=A0 =C2=A013.901603] md: md0 stopped.
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------= ->8---
>>>
>>> Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layou= t to 1 or 2=E2=80=9D?
>>>
>>
>> On kernel 5.3.4 and above the
>> raid0.default_layout=3D2 kernel boot paramter should be set. We sh= ould
>> generate our grub configuration accordingly.

So, this might be sort of a tangent, but I'm wondering why you're testing raid0 (striping, for performance+capacity at risk of data loss)
instead of raid1 (mirroring, for redundancy, fast reads, slow writes,
half capacity of storage), or another raid level with more disks (raid5, raid6, raid10). raid1 would be the simplest to switch the code to, since it uses only two disks.


The issue triggering this bug might be a non-issue on other raid levels
that in my mind might make more sense for rootfs. Or maybe people have
use-casese for rootfs on raid0 that I'm too uncreative to think of? :)<= br>

I= often see raid 10 as root. I believe it might make sense to test that setu= p.


live well,
=C2=A0 vagrant
--0000000000009b560b059c6a0efb-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits , 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.157938401910629 (code B ref 38086); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2020 21:46:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42412 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isvvn-0002lN-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:46:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isvvk-0002lA-Ik for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:46:57 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1isvvf-0005BS-2O; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:46:51 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60930 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1isvve-00034G-BZ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:46:50 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:46:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:42:53 -0800") Message-ID: <87lfq4v3nb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > So, this might be sort of a tangent, but I'm wondering why you're > testing raid0 (striping, for performance+capacity at risk of data loss) > instead of raid1 (mirroring, for redundancy, fast reads, slow writes, > half capacity of storage), or another raid level with more disks (raid5, > raid6, raid10). raid1 would be the simplest to switch the code to, since > it uses only two disks. Good point! I guess it would make sense to test RAID1, indeed. I gave it a shot with the patch below. Problem is that installation seemingly hangs here: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- + parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M mkpart pri= mary ext2 3M 1.4G mkpart primary ext2 1.4G 2.8G set 1 boot on set 1 bios_gr= ub on + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dmirror --raid-devices=3D2 /de= v/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 mdadm: Note: this array has metadata at the start and may not be suitable as a boot device. If you plan to store '/boot' on this device please ensure that your boot-loader understands md/v1.x metadata, or use --metadata=3D0.90 mdadm: size set to 1361920K mdadm: largest drive (/dev/vdb3) exceeds size (1361920K) by more than 1% --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- As you can see, it=E2=80=99s attempting to make a RAID1 device out of two partitions (not two disks), which makes no sense in the real world, but is easier to handle here. So I wonder if this is what=E2=80=99s causing it= to hang=E2=80=A6 Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/gnu/tests/install.scm b/gnu/tests/install.scm index 8842d48df8..12e6eb26df 100644 --- a/gnu/tests/install.scm +++ b/gnu/tests/install.scm @@ -546,8 +546,8 @@ where /gnu lives on a separate partition.") (target "/dev/vdb"))) (kernel-arguments '("console=ttyS0")) - ;; Add a kernel module for RAID-0 (aka. "stripe"). - (initrd-modules (cons "raid0" %base-initrd-modules)) + ;; Add a kernel module for RAID-1 (aka. "mirror"). + (initrd-modules (cons "raid1" %base-initrd-modules)) (mapped-devices (list (mapped-device (source (list "/dev/vda2" "/dev/vda3")) @@ -578,11 +578,11 @@ guix --version export GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=--no-grafts parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt \\ mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M \\ - mkpart primary ext2 3M 600M \\ - mkpart primary ext2 600M 1200M \\ + mkpart primary ext2 3M 1.4G \\ + mkpart primary ext2 1.4G 2.8G \\ set 1 boot on \\ set 1 bios_grub on -mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=stripe --raid-devices=2 \\ +mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=mirror --raid-devices=2 \\ /dev/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 mkfs.ext4 -L root-fs /dev/md0 mount /dev/md0 /mnt @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ by 'mdadm'.") %raid-root-os-source #:script %raid-root-installation-script - #:target-size (* 1300 MiB))) + #:target-size (* 2800 MiB))) (command (qemu-command/writable-image image))) (run-basic-test %raid-root-os `(,@command) "raid-root-os"))))) --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.157938499612170 (code B ref 38086); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:04:01 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2020 22:03:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iswBY-0003AD-Dw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:03:16 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:54356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iswBW-0003A5-97 for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:03:15 -0500 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0647b590; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:03:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=4CgHV2CP9bi1T9f4Cu4oM0 wL7fLLZv6f0gXEkJRwuuw=; b=NzOpIlxAHBYxas/FIA2PkrYL6B9r6rsBM2sDvr i3UaWyZidkam/3chfHdPiEs8+Bx/OV7w1yRKPs2SqPA+RKIps2XevdWlcQO6W8q7 kN87wJ+SF+uReRJXY+q/XuDHFhNW61IAbvGy+Wp2KQWoXqxCZzONJIDZs/bJaL3v MrljkIWw2riIyJ0N2lGRvse+KSYVefVfhOtnesX7PK3o5UExBmz/thJT4PZYHDsC 96MuxGhwiDKY4BiQ66yFKdgnxv3VzmzOJOh+IiVNcVhhy/CiXLUzN7O/zTlzONr7 HSjUw6Y2HPkgwKb7YPWROxrFsvL1tQdxQpOuGwyRrjs/vF1A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d054b67b (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:03:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> <87lfq4v3nb.fsf@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <87lfq4v3nb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:03:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87h80sbexq.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > As you can see, it=E2=80=99s attempting to make a RAID1 device out of=20 > two > partitions (not two disks), which makes no sense in the real=20 > world, but > is easier to handle here. So I wonder if this is what=E2=80=99s causing= =20 > it to > hang=E2=80=A6 It's just waiting for input: $ # dd & losetup magic, where loop0 is 20% larger than loop1 $ sudo mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dmirror=20 --raid-devices=3D2 /dev/loop{0,1} mdadm: Note: this array has metadata at the start and may not be suitable as a boot device. If you plan to store '/boot' on this device please ensure that your boot-loader understands md/v1.x metadata, or use --metadata=3D0.90 mdadm: size set to 101376K mdadm: largest drive (/dev/loop1) exceeds size (101376K) by more=20 than 1% Continue creating array? Adding --force does not avoid this. I recommend tweaking the partition table to make both members=20 equal, but a =E2=80=98yes|=E2=80=99 also works if you're in a hurry ;-) Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl4jgKEACgkQ2Imw8BjF STyvYw/+M3VniY/3EnWypbLcneJqx+II8GDA3HwmhvI9q+4PWqpK6ZAMzxTEt1Cs QvCiXgmsX3EnjyRTtEaGil/o16QsBJdDeF4HGK//MStM2OEQY7Tix273X0DGJvKK kB1RhOhZjsXEUtnndOfGpNCDQClW4UD6Ht4WaxWstSWzdk5Cx4Gpy5+B+wdf2zYp gxDzCAHb6yrvk43y7MP0KjxowmJlIEKWr0Js2j7sZUr34Fmj1jSVQF4tUVezY6rX 6WtjEdPc0Flx6smiq6uN7YDup+ntGmDL/3lqHtUL+t2hwQ8hmjAR4b8A5hFhL8Cx lTZxzEp2a43nkR7mN9+OF0qZYSVkrJ57/y0GQAkt4FkSAYYHXPkyax4S9v/v9Xyf 7OV06DTBLDOjY26EweViKcGLqUqQ5lJ0jY1qK7oI/uV3r+viq7XohA9Xa43Szosd iSegtOuyVtBk9Nc5RaBoOTjB2lws022rtucKunrKeM/WZKRHihZOOLgKrg3OgvBo fMK6FPNArvm5YK8+fDdGcOJXKCictWIYPWMqZtS8lAnameN2GvyulzO+4oOFhtUo 0ZohpXeg/Zhb2SwhddzsRzXeQ8O2h3XcwAXj3kO2zDD4E2CZ+bGq5koNtk3VkvMA mUB8BUk0dSrGDtyoripoje+bl0SmmX2ZORepCNG/2I5jrPl8xEg= =x/c4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#38086: closed (Re: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works) Message-ID: References: <87a76jqelv.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 38086 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:14:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1579472042-22230-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1579472042-22230-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #38086: RAID installation script with =E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99 no longer wor= ks which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 38086@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 38086: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38086 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1579472042-22230-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 38086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2020 22:13:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itIpE-0005ll-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:13:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itIpC-0005lT-CV for 38086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:13:42 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itIp6-0006bE-NN; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:13:36 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=33458 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1itIp3-00025D-R8; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:13:34 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?utf-8?B?4oCYbWRh?= =?utf-8?B?ZG3igJk=?= no longer works References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> <87lfq4v3nb.fsf@gnu.org> <87h80sbexq.fsf@nckx> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:13:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h80sbexq.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:03:13 +0100") Message-ID: <87a76jqelv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 38086-done Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , 38086-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Tobias! Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > It's just waiting for input: > > $ # dd & losetup magic, where loop0 is 20% larger than loop1 > $ sudo mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dmirror > --raid-devices=3D2 /dev/loop{0,1} > mdadm: Note: this array has metadata at the start and > may not be suitable as a boot device. If you plan to > store '/boot' on this device please ensure that > your boot-loader understands md/v1.x metadata, or use > --metadata=3D0.90 > mdadm: size set to 101376K > mdadm: largest drive (/dev/loop1) exceeds size (101376K) by more than > 1% > Continue creating array? D=E2=80=99oh, I hadn=E2=80=99t seen that message. > Adding --force does not avoid this. > > I recommend tweaking the partition table to make both members equal, > but a =E2=80=98yes|=E2=80=99 also works if you're in a hurry ;-) =E2=80=9Cyes|=E2=80=9D works like a charm, I went this that. Pushed in commit 3adf320e44e54017a67f219ce9667a379c393dad, thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1579472042-22230-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2019 10:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJT-0005K3-1T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJQ-0005Jv-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJP-0008If-PZ for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJP-0002Wk-J5 for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:15 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51624 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iSIJO-0001yY-T2 for bug-Guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 05:13:15 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: bug-Guix@gnu.org Subject: RAID installation script with =?utf-8?B?4oCYbWRhZG3igJk=?= no longer works X-Debbugs-Cc: Andreas Enge X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Brumaire an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:13:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Looks like our RAID installation method no longer works, as can be seen at : --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- + guix --version guix (GNU Guix) c4de60ac3c6aa5b46519011af89988215c347e9e Copyright (C) 2019 the Guix authors License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. + export GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts + GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--no-grafts + parted --script /dev/vdb mklabel gpt mkpart primary ext2 1M 3M mkpart pri= mary ext2 3M 600M mkpart primary ext2 600M 1200M set 1 boot on set 1 bios_g= rub on + mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=3Dstripe --raid-devices=3D2 /de= v/vdb2 /dev/vdb3 mdadm: chunk size defaults to 512K mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata [ 13.890586] md/raid0:md0: cannot assemble multi-zone RAID0 with default_= layout setting [ 13.894691] md/raid0: please set raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2 [ 13.896000] md: pers->run() failed ... mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Unknown error 524 [ 13.901603] md: md0 stopped. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Anyone knows what it takes to =E2=80=9Cset raid0.default_layout to 1 or 2= =E2=80=9D? We should then update (gnu tests install) and the manual accordingly. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1579472042-22230-1-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 11:13:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#38086: RAID installation script with =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98mdadm=E2=80=99?= no longer works Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 38086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 38086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38086.157947310524134 (code B ref 38086); Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 38086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2020 22:31:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itJ6e-0006HB-Ow for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:31:44 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:44518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itJ6d-0006H2-4t for 38086@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 17:31:44 -0500 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d7b41da9; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:31:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=MXhLz8jpPTmju0brPQtaZY ZlYSdH3ZmCF33d/cDp0mM=; b=HTenmwMEdTB/uMUZ1VlQPxDXHOUCjjN9cW5YBn Ts25KDfE6Kcfsh/TR2c6zfq2//WB+yk/Ohf1aqrK3yWgBtiUKZ9+IMv5NqGhH46l V5higTXZyUvcnjay2mxuFpbIB63mhSyJk5p31FGjGOjJBCFqc+LR0hduWxk0JHu+ qN8WoRY/3SyoCCK3bqrKanCXzZlrCq3K1bB54OWX42usb6XtCz2L8fN1bG9dz+5B +M1CvaTkdSlZgo7Zp8j0+xClcpa1TTFWTic9+fnpYqn2FOGqsFg1j708GmqSVgbz mGB7m+fyMvk+CW0vP89O9SY1gS1Mq/Cyr7165W1hHGZlaXww== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9ae1fe9c (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:31:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <87sgn18g92.fsf@inria.fr> <877e46m1qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1zx902a.fsf@yucca> <87lfq4v3nb.fsf@gnu.org> <87h80sbexq.fsf@nckx> <87a76jqelv.fsf@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <87a76jqelv.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:31:41 +0100 Message-ID: <8736cbaxiq.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludo', Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> Continue creating array? > > D=E2=80=99oh, I hadn=E2=80=99t seen that message. I doubt it was there for you to see in Guix's output. Things not=20 ending with a newline tend to get lost easily due to=20 line-buffering. Probably not worth worrying about. > =E2=80=9Cyes|=E2=80=9D works like a charm, I went this that. =E2=80=98Beautiful=E2=80=99, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl4k2M0ACgkQ2Imw8BjF STweMRAAjp0HGqwVygVdx9JWuoS4lI3hoPZDOq1HSstInOaMbY+J8TAl7qccqOhy 15ziTZfOiYjYsLI0de8hDEA71LyDCtVvRQPCJrh0MCxrlkMmMTflua0NRh9sfMqE 4S58W9ftl2cBg+zI3BY5j31pdQkOfi1soYD3VZNII/a8JAt5z2mpLr6NyvyjxVR6 ZhsbzKVYEyfVDnGhCqbv9IguNdjnDCOfy18T37tJ/S+FCR6C1nZnB7HvJTyu59CK NWb5bFP5oj/IlGdBr1OxJCrUX2ks+VOjnUeTFX1WZxdRji96phHfDHR05dcfx502 oOt4JEVCQ9sfYJebHSHxEHRoIgFIq1CX3L114wRaURY0m2EwuksOZofJExeNtY3o 6weXO1R5e3ZBzTN2DCpQ8gALttj4KnPy24DGXL2JW7Vq7wuaoraeRLuj6eP1xkgl 1ik7gq46DDs2BH1AI0blkb79Kz1vfrbEuzpxQzOYiQpW8bgWO9A3VNaqAVEerLfN S6Dkx6XH91/MSTkZSD81jTOAH4Tbz/pDzUWtCrS7BMta9IfUrvNs4raEMyNk0gOi sfeebdAwQWCT//RjY4lIQ2r982Bkv/reC6xu8nuPDVg+qe0o7Ub78vgo1f247+2q IUmv003X3DBQI07Yuc7pRfpzcExcko0PhBkxhdXMLeb0ZdaRFgo= =jCNI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--