GNU bug report logs - #38019
[PATCH] Fix build of virtuoso-ose.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38019: closed ([PATCH] Fix build of virtuoso-ose.)
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:04:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:03:43 +0100
with message-id <87wocgopsg.fsf <at> devup.no>
and subject line Re: [bug#38019] [PATCH] Fix build of virtuoso-ose.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38019,
regarding [PATCH] Fix build of virtuoso-ose.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
38019: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38019
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix build of virtuoso-ose.
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:56:18 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear Guix,

I attached a patch to fix the build of 'virtuoso-ose'.  It's been a
long time since I submitted a patch, so if it was already fixed in some
other branch, then disregard this patch.

Could somebody apply it?

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

[0001-databases-Fix-build-of-virtuoso-ose.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>, 38019-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38019] [PATCH] Fix build of virtuoso-ose.
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:03:43 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Dear Guix,
>
> I attached a patch to fix the build of 'virtuoso-ose'.  It's been a
> long time since I submitted a patch, so if it was already fixed in some
> other branch, then disregard this patch.
>
> Could somebody apply it?

Thanks!  I applied it, after changing from 'openssl-1.0.2t' to the more
stable 'openssl-1.0' variable, and adjusted the commit message to match.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.