From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. Resent-From: Kai Mertens Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 09:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 37939 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157216685122743 (code B ref -1); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 09:01:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2019 09:00:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePr-0005uL-1Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePp-0005sr-KK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePm-00032C-RO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePl-0001Ce-F0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:46 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:52607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePk-0001C9-Vo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:45 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 105B42400FD for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:00:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1572166842; bh=6mxnChhcxiQ37hWYAXW70rDEPta2eVNDfyTZrv5vJuU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=cMyay7jIqX6xd2lK2sPHirsOeYi2JpJ4NNVkhCIHZp4ds7X0tXhl5AVCz+PEUQmBX Z0BYSN9ie3yXpngghgsHpWruqzS8WFZbfS9e2snp5KcXjFuFM+hFZ1SE2rxkhtkNaW SacMEp6FuWZjiSBJ0v3WDecKj1XlUWOGrFPiroklhKPlCqvk0m4uEDb/ZQeDFBjxGS uMRh0e5hkpYhQsk2C3XbtxpJStDsMGdfwa5vv0b1YzdfL1tFg0y0+mFKUc4cKa+SpZ v9nLBEZSCCP54fJZ36j5krQuy3gRvL793Pmyrhq/xW6LmdnIcYtJ/HTd+Q3HG2PZcg 0UpG/R6z8gGsw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 471Bdj437Yz9rxG for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:00:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 09:59:39 +0100 From: Kai Mertens Message-ID: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.67.36.66 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear GNU Guix developers, I just tried to install guix on top of a fresh debian10 system, which has been installed from debian-live-10.0.0-amd64-gnome.iso and updated. The guix install script fails in function chk_gpg_keyring(), although the key is present. If I remove the discard redirection >/dev/null 2>&1 from the gpg command, the following message occurs: gpg: keyblock resource '/root/.gnupg/pubring.kbx': No such file or directo= ry gpg: Fatal: /root/.gnupg: directory does not exist! Of course these files do not exist, as I imported the key to the user account, not to the root account. Then I executed the script as user, using sudo. This procedure works fine on trisquel7 or 8, but it fails on debian10. I wonder why =E2=80=98sudo gpg=E2=80=99 does not make a difference between = being called via sudo versus being called as root. Do I use debian the wrong way? best regards Kai --=20 Kai Mertens OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x40B15AB4B05B5BF1 on keys.gnupg.net Key fingerprint =3D 7C83 0A80 01FF 679C 6E8E AFD3 40B1 5AB4 B05B 5BF1 What is that? Please check: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ --Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfIMKgAH/Z5xujq/TQLFatLBbW/EFAl21XHsACgkQQLFatLBb W/FefRAApEiOMID58UFXkMKpcOUiZdRpu69W2IbMb2/pXm3mJfJ/inmIqU/TVSyD /Xt3/vuy0YjoVJhkf35FYG7WAAy9/Yvfw6LEHDHJXQ5na/Cn+0JNuL46BkBBUcjx N59C+muL/n5Sz8SuIsrO1NY/ltNgBoYoQt1/yCa6m0xA1I0LHDQtKdtV6EAykia4 d3jDVB7G01UY4asm2rjXfelgypI/Yol8x0RciXXQzHZLKl25lqAob4IjG31sAQ1Z R8AVufgerQEk/+k1ysDPxbknRFCqUVZ810JPx/lohKH401V8SPrz4yGyhSQhhk20 XZ+8CmnAYmejDbGpzgj2+bfC9jsrdsH40DfqIthcYbjSLlPU7H1cbDCLCvTCiDIq a2utjUMymRDo+AYTIrSpDmx24NsJxLTm7PNqatwxqMjN50PPnkNerSSL2ltYvmes /oUc5cg3/PnHQvFPi8YRb5NqPuI75Tot5XnZJDnjRO75203iPwUXUnW26k49hfyt T8qYTGn2abkqBO9f6YStwpLejnNY1g4i0C3vqLdYj/StKsGaQlsj8sf+FlToA8kg C4Pzxke0SG16lftJPF05cv+23B03CJciqIlAvMTphzDCTsac7nFr34cGIdKUvesB DuwjDmSylNwQgnm2uwcGNduU+mb3UZvggtbX7zu7WisK9YgmHb0= =hD7n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. Resent-From: Bengt Richter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37939 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kai Mertens Cc: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Bengt Richter Received: via spool by 37939-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37939.157217853522493 (code B ref 37939); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 12:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 37939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2019 12:15:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOhSI-0005qj-NJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 08:15:34 -0400 Received: from imta-38.everyone.net ([216.200.145.38]:60374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOhSG-0005qX-4P for 37939@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 08:15:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (omta003.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9RC8q45021888; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:15:30 -0700 X-Eon-Originating-Account: qgfpjiMrL6Eyo4Cyg30r0cSD2koK4L8UWzFPCp_mJLo X-Eon-Dm: m0117124.ppops.net Received: by m0117124.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 32d0d199) id m0117124.5db23b86.75bfd; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:15:24 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJdtYpcSldFQQIAAAAC,a518b244ad89aa2ccdd561b00fe808b0 X-Eip: 9xvvsAV9rJYsrJZSEihy3sQxhqOkS_MlSVThr1yhqY0 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:15:17 -0700 From: Bengt Richter Message-ID: <20191027121517.GB2716@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> References: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-27_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910270129 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Hi again Kai, On +2019-10-27 09:59:39 +0100, Kai Mertens wrote: > Dear GNU Guix developers, > > I just tried to install guix on top of a fresh debian10 system, which > has been installed from debian-live-10.0.0-amd64-gnome.iso and updated. > > The guix install script fails in function chk_gpg_keyring(), although > the key is present. > > If I remove the discard redirection >/dev/null 2>&1 from the gpg > command, the following message occurs: > > gpg: keyblock resource '/root/.gnupg/pubring.kbx': No such file or directory > gpg: Fatal: /root/.gnupg: directory does not exist! > > Of course these files do not exist, as I imported the key to the user > account, not to the root account. Then I executed the script as user, > using sudo. > > This procedure works fine on trisquel7 or 8, but it fails on debian10. > > I wonder why ‘sudo gpg’ does not make a difference between being called > via sudo versus being called as root. > man sudo ;-) specifically the -i option I think if you are a "sudoer" plain sudo switches you to root, but keeps the environment you were in, with PATH etc, but sudo -i will set the environment as if you logged in as root. try "sudo set" and compare with "sudo -i set" (or env in place of set) HTH -- Regards, Bengt Richter From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. Resent-From: Kai Mertens Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 02:34:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37939 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bengt Richter Cc: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 37939-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37939.15738716129298 (code B ref 37939); Sat, 16 Nov 2019 02:34:03 +0000 Received: (at 37939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2019 02:33:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVntw-0002Pq-Fp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:33:32 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:35917) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVntu-0002PM-F8 for 37939@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:33:27 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895192400FB for <37939@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:33:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1573871600; bh=VVW7SH/YrCRAyUOWJjN6tIptAUZAkxjQ9ayK6TYcYuQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=YXsXUAb9j6i4J8oDUOa9UjiU1UoX1aR9lUpqtVr+7CnmXhWxmPgkIFhpKCHy1rPR1 Di5jErIDqFMo1ddhZZbXQNErcQjKfCGthoFqzCtKaMgD5VA0T+RhMigJucmqF2Jg09 g66fDuG1oxdifvhaRwt+MASP7HNmtJSwS6EPB0CyDrOyxyv93YsLR33Hu0uTgGSa6P ERgGzYfv+FU0lbB+QYr5empaWQUBh++KL2aWLfTuriWfw7w0AJO4kV1UkCW/+H2cCB 4Iiv81U4N4dMg74SC/WlGCG7Yzz34TZ6pYq+fpcmANW5QV1HLsZkfpDIfKsjC82QWp SQ+GXtMbnyc3w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 47FK5W3mcpz9rxL; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:33:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 02:29:27 +0100 From: Kai Mertens Message-ID: <20191113122512.53ff5d9c.kmx@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: <20191027121517.GB2716@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> References: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> <20191027121517.GB2716@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/iLQ13GF0CP_frGXZwOC9aZN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --Sig_/iLQ13GF0CP_frGXZwOC9aZN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:15:17 -0700 Bengt Richter wrote: > Hi again Kai, >=20 > On +2019-10-27 09:59:39 +0100, Kai Mertens wrote: > > Dear GNU Guix developers, > >=20 > > [...] > > =20 >=20 > man sudo ;-) Oops. >=20 > specifically the -i option >=20 > I think if you are a "sudoer" plain sudo switches you to root, > but keeps the environment you were in, with PATH etc,=20 > but sudo -i will set the environment as if you logged in as root. >=20 > try "sudo set" and compare with "sudo -i set"=20 > (or env in place of set) Well, I tried "sudo --preserve-env ./guix-install.sh" on debian10, that seems to work fine and the key in the sudoer=E2=80=99s keyring is detected.= On trisquel, I am used to use plain sudo instead. Anyway =E2=80=93 it is of course not a bug of the guix script. Maybe a usage hint within the guix documentation in section 2.1 would be nice? Thanks for your help, best regards Kai --=20 Kai Mertens OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x40B15AB4B05B5BF1 on keys.gnupg.net Key fingerprint =3D 7C83 0A80 01FF 679C 6E8E AFD3 40B1 5AB4 B05B 5BF1 What is that? Please check: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ --Sig_/iLQ13GF0CP_frGXZwOC9aZN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfIMKgAH/Z5xujq/TQLFatLBbW/EFAl3PUPcACgkQQLFatLBb W/EriA//QLsCDhf+nEnmq8g5f+IsU2/DrwhRgKateA3vK6s27Cnlq4FBUnEtSf77 T5qxkc9c7hAslgUbHtuxI9RSbGGXI1dV8VsmL2uHWElNTCKRv1IS/GBfBLYEXHcy pCOLWamKlWe6MlbPT6DzIHGQuWGPvejN+BeRemKPKg2u4FaVGR7JzgtTo2VCisab CJd0elTWQ7htYQy3CuJR8GH+K2A5NzsFFAf1imPgv6h5FnWqGHvbtHIEBUpIaQKp UlbhoDxF+kdkM/y4cNSSVOtdHZAAQ7y/+KySBzWru0D1vMymJgjJhFe5Djm1Layu T8UMDL6KKgH3gjZbU/NODfwwyCOZ+Xh6s75LNN6YEeYUwrFDJV/+JgFlIxyxQ7fL sDKlAeaSFfKRdtimGsjXlVDAanWeKjoMwQxHjC/Qk9oftHCgLNKd1AotBatjYAHG 8qdexWugiH5thvyD1pno7G8f+GOa+w2vRhdR7F458mNKSLpBaGiucdaTJ6/znOdD eDs56NdSAYZGOPxhxbt5KqyxMX5vYZ3tPRsvJ7y96gmtd7vLzBq8qw2ztpeQRJQ4 aoRMJQntssWvqMFGShsbphM+T/4aq0JX/itnAkbUkD1ic2JuvVGw4a/vs7IJYd1q SxyD4MzmB/66lQaIyB1crT+Kp8Nhxp5iziARor6ANwgVIlYPTjo= =A6ze -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/iLQ13GF0CP_frGXZwOC9aZN-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37939 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kai Mertens Cc: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org, Bengt Richter Received: via spool by 37939-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37939.15740726975100 (code B ref 37939); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:25:01 +0000 Received: (at 37939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2019 10:24:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWeDI-0001KC-Oh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:24:56 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com ([209.85.222.178]:45865) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWeDG-0001Jy-PW for 37939@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:24:55 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id q70so13869014qke.12 for <37939@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:24:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b61+YMzh5Teuwjmt9W7vPlOc8bviht+fwMKfrQmYU9Q=; b=Msokq1GAreVBUScj0KBqF1Dhwlg5ziKLIOL/tK71jKcrwEgLBLJGD20kqVuX7aA1K8 i4jWGc+3ZWKhyD7EA5mQwTKl10aB3+xKM+Vm/4mHhSgzZeyzYYAWaSqsbqyMUqgXCGSw eqVCNR9ZwBCVS75GSwcWSa5T8pRIllQEiOKlcBza8AQgmYAodq+x3GkIl9q+gEy2I4bV J028w507HjAAI6fuWlcNxvsejVxTbdddHFIsTW+MSh/uC4wc8dFM2dC6fb7BXZY0GAEW XbTqitOAF1SiOBucO+uwrnBTBCd9ULCsaH3cmt4L4gqw63Pj/n4BA+sCdY7eZafYj548 qs8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b61+YMzh5Teuwjmt9W7vPlOc8bviht+fwMKfrQmYU9Q=; b=FWqia/F7czLQqyb1AHnvyki5n5FPA/lfGOb5QWq00FkuDVUWH4G9VpUAI9RFRIyAmT /ILw191v2a5NxrVtQ7BSmtcAJkQ8zeQGsD+mexNaZLiPKem4EYWQOFd2Ik8NDFMyVJY/ pZ7TfM9ujDW8UMQY5NSmBivZOAv6IH9K3zXFUHY9SvpkYegA0IODUeQkbpff9CIioA0+ YB9En5T+zDNwhsqmLR9I6iuDS/lgO1xCYmkfCoGlD4mow5Hffb7mpWFs7rMwHhmuBaEd wd5CKJMcDcbF3ydQsK7Mk+b/3twbn3WCFMnVSYn1g64mWfDJ/xYGNgYu4POiUdDHAGrI FhLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGh+rUrzzZfbOqngLOKRLPYSyIahQv977Url/xZQ3xa0vxYgcH 1HPOtYnIqr7qvu+ULBmxU/P6sIV5Zkwh0n9hDTw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzULyuuVpqmjBSx7r/UtuSbJOfOX9Y8RUDrAoCmExeD9qEx3eTiGGVyZp2WX8jX/6EfOJMmZDPfJ1W+ogGf/F8= X-Received: by 2002:a37:4146:: with SMTP id o67mr23549149qka.232.1574072689209; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:24:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> <20191027121517.GB2716@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <20191113122512.53ff5d9c.kmx@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: <20191113122512.53ff5d9c.kmx@posteo.net> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:24:38 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 03:34, Kai Mertens wrote: > Anyway =E2=80=93 it is of course not a bug of the guix script. Maybe a us= age > hint within the guix documentation in section 2.1 would be nice? Could you elaborate on a first attempt? I am not sure to understand which hint you suggest. The manual says: "It should be run as the root user." So to install on my Debian, I simply log as root. :-) If you speak about adding a hint when using the command sudo, then is it really reliable on all the foreign distributions? Because the command sudo is not always configured the same way, as you experimented with Debian vs Trisquel. All the best, simon From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37939 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kai Mertens Cc: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org, Bengt Richter Received: via spool by 37939-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37939.15822950596141 (code B ref 37939); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 37939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2020 14:24:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j59E2-0001az-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:24:19 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com ([209.85.222.169]:36483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j59E1-0001am-AN for 37939@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:24:17 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id t83so1950538qke.3 for <37939@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:24:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=udRSBM9qZ/EsKVVx5lCf0NvZBxzbpshqXmZQZ/j63/8=; b=Ah4f6yG8IfOiuf1YY43NsxVR0vX+FL03T2XnSHqDn9MDTGvzldhJ4dYxvnnDNYQMJE ZXgmxe6cWCbh70g6+NSMCGkgkbVvBKIQ1WfbeQNlNOHirfyK9wS1HTczVPrpwD/SWPO7 LXgFhQPocW1Rajg1ZIe0bvpMUiREIRCn1KQe/8R1XnJRnl0X7PFq2pMfqLuO+wEQDhox 2EtGc0RDdIrMY4lwlxX4kTyOGsgPNrcxaZkoxo3eZnCPJ6wfGKS7+1Q7EnHRyeRP2Atv +Cj+G1T8JgIpkEgmgaMJwDpO0/1dEmcmxUKbcp0dlRazTwkMY6YZIKlJPf1XY5dm6Ew8 xuxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=udRSBM9qZ/EsKVVx5lCf0NvZBxzbpshqXmZQZ/j63/8=; b=cyZbTfnbY76/rnQ9M6V1zaWhe0ud0XPVpMqjt1GBC6X4dBkeAqwKFWwiD9z1rQm/R4 l45k7W7qGBhH4zhVQfe27l1F6ilYG+PtfXX76B+87YLiTRvzfAijZK87+TSofhSnQBDF x38eUx4/3L/0sEssvkEM4g9pMFsao23Urw1+6E+O6zce/sahVm2s7s5FXc8sqCfCH1bW 7kI0Dl/346HwAupX0IJMSRf6yMtFlp7jRckhzeZUlD3EZ0Fs12A2whPSePcC71fHT6YI OISJOuGg3LuloCwFpJUwE0CL0os2bvhVbpMeRpoLtAXGzHnaGHayLvxNq6amMoZsgRCR FBfg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdQjlT8rPL+z84gWIRIRzPyzWafRFXYDAk27W6flN4igpoJuuP Brd7a3TBTLEAjBirEDwI0tYajTxgwHVdo0CUce4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwaCDaCAMnfG28JmkE9P0yfxnRUgeiBK8k4GLKyWUkORdkshr7z4zPpbsmhg+Vxe7iaysHTizn/a4OAQ2IdtkE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:124f:: with SMTP id a15mr30577125qkl.201.1582295051840; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:24:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> <20191027121517.GB2716@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain> <20191113122512.53ff5d9c.kmx@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:24:00 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear > On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 03:34, Kai Mertens wrote: > > Anyway =E2=80=93 it is of course not a bug of the guix script. Maybe a = usage > > hint within the guix documentation in section 2.1 would be nice? I think it is not a bug and I do not see what could be improved. I would like to close this bug. Is it ok for you? Or do you have a comment to add? Thank you in advance. All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 14 10:34:19 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2020 14:34:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34368 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZEwF-0005d9-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:34:19 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com ([209.85.222.179]:38634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZEwD-0005ct-JZ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:34:17 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id f189so3159900qkd.5 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jTxQo7AkAQ128fFxafmgfUJwNrwqIIs8JJW+3gmAEOs=; b=IvoLD/80PjmcuuhKd6NWbJv1mk3JabzKwVLUVfKiOON0qqX7dK+UHtnxM39PCn9gcg pmklze8wD5gxpK7ph7MLFLmF1lsJcOwv+B1nwLPb8PUibwH2VWmVlJA4JNVtSQmnBr0y LA6U6C3+5Fzu1cgvcvr62mCAjj4c9HAWSXsaQDsnoGxwR2MVWnwzQ3bXXpaQyjRIwhwR s0ZfO+c3SZwrre0EsnJaYLL5d4zUxWHJZciPLOVoedRJpJeqgbUZTorihaHU+DZsbZHO e8D//MuF30xTqZiWtLsYLr5U6hITjL48wNRGC1ZMfkaJSWlbuQtG/sI4Z1UHXUuKIi44 qFNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jTxQo7AkAQ128fFxafmgfUJwNrwqIIs8JJW+3gmAEOs=; b=fbH1ieFEtzg/7lsHzHKsMsc4z9spoEe9GDxaCgcBjxbUQ/JZ1VYQa0H/6E8JRh8TfV ahx4Wt6ZPqS3E1TzoVwijiW8NwK5971nSmx14yUyBedgv6c8hZnC0yyCbo2ls/ZUqSbt xlmeZ1tI7DpLHzGVoMHsQ1fN7rF5KMZZk/xvb8ALJO9w63RgP9SqXjykk3IqFy4ksdhv /FLV6UZRT7kXy1tqrQLNH8hBX1ZV0cFIYyAMMgErW4lbaPk5Zc8l2I/OtIQF0b79A/RG 6WpIFZv9qktyiMgfDl9ZmoVpCew+VnkDqQrCK1ub3upwTcP75VyVPYT6fkP/t4i3xNHC y4aw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531x9FDyjshnmAUAckIMdtJgmAA2oXkJmm63RoiSiEXnk6hzqLh3 f9a1rvKykuRieP0GVGW7NfNJn0/uNtK1q8h69qS/MIJf X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTWKHqd484DStcyXR+IFKHCHbhpSixaTxe/91dxgCMR6WNjZxCekE4sABVqpOhpylHTVJkHsa14kNYZ42EFUE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:662:: with SMTP id a2mr4605939qkh.304.1589466850791; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:34:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:33:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: tags notabug To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 37939 notabug thanks From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:08 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Kai Mertens Subject: bug#37939: closed (bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key) Message-ID: References: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 37939 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: notabug Reply-To: 37939@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 00:19:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1590106742-29489-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1590106742-29489-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 37939@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 37939: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D37939 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1590106742-29489-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 37939-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2020 00:18:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbvOH-0007ek-Fe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:18:24 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]:45273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbvOG-0007eX-7j for 37939-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:18:20 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f175.google.com with SMTP id n22so7005362qtv.12 for <37939-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 17:18:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Q08YDyi3jnQOJhoS/NBZAo4ebtkEdElUyxXuyK47VjM=; b=s1UOiv8KLVbd39TLLBzTpnYZl+12SAEs7ZqoQ0GKTqlR0zEhPzIw389JpaUPwu5Hj4 +r4vRq7jvUtQ+6w9AJRaUYcYWJu/dsNcZTqesizDp2oGsBQcS6GoAGXZkdQroXvIqcW4 SFez/8TomN7yldCB70KpPoOwhs1RY963JZG9mtYngcaZP6mKk+Q7bX+HCLNoGbtiXjGF jB9wp1YJ9ijGss2jhb42uOza1VOQHC5TXku7nyI6zaa//YJsM6LutIxsv/NXOaJ6lA8H bl1V8/2bQFeuEXYNIgHaYrwfiIuct1mWkdp0Y7+zLf3oziz1DZ0rXSRIeBUIRErA3INH sMMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Q08YDyi3jnQOJhoS/NBZAo4ebtkEdElUyxXuyK47VjM=; b=iB9gzdge+TViUpFLeNUxRihmdPxE2OmHCKxLKzPMX+lXBsJMoG+W6Fb70ttnf2WXXx JCxab0u1IhzKPxbPDuvkEGgdcMbv7h0zQWtqMBD6lVOFL9FdIU1LRY58bqJy1L8xdmCu giA63evfvH0/wnbunD7tEhCUQYmBRumL9GxoQ1szSj7eFD4bgBedHj/JEcKmq8F/Sbl+ do7w+GWD+Xid2+eZkIMQo7j9Owa7As+ZS3K9wFpTx7glLMvY0NvNxllsffij+YvtcvZa j8zCB0jZ8AZL7YiSRouNvP+nY096I2DTEvrL549k7kUjjBOD8zrHbawSUj3lFmGefLRK WMeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TQVGktCyU3y4QUV5ml9nYIny1xhhy3HITFZCOnaZ1VzgmrZlx qpN+HllF6cwWso5hw54USk2Vfrr6Nqakwk7X0sQVxQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeWH6RQD8ALtC5UnEtnx1eWVcyJaSshgvYwam2DXYz0kPVzuyAUtCU7TiZAgy7hhGBqnBDCbt/6TVPnw7Cexo= X-Received: by 2002:aed:2d44:: with SMTP id h62mr13298171qtd.217.1590106694487; Thu, 21 May 2020 17:18:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 02:18:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: bug#37939: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key To: 37939-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37939-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, Because it is not a bug and after 12 weeks without any activity, I am closing. Best regards, simon ------------=_1590106742-29489-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2019 09:00:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePr-0005uL-1Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePp-0005sr-KK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePm-00032C-RO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePl-0001Ce-F0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:46 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:52607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOePk-0001C9-Vo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:00:45 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 105B42400FD for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:00:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1572166842; bh=6mxnChhcxiQ37hWYAXW70rDEPta2eVNDfyTZrv5vJuU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=cMyay7jIqX6xd2lK2sPHirsOeYi2JpJ4NNVkhCIHZp4ds7X0tXhl5AVCz+PEUQmBX Z0BYSN9ie3yXpngghgsHpWruqzS8WFZbfS9e2snp5KcXjFuFM+hFZ1SE2rxkhtkNaW SacMEp6FuWZjiSBJ0v3WDecKj1XlUWOGrFPiroklhKPlCqvk0m4uEDb/ZQeDFBjxGS uMRh0e5hkpYhQsk2C3XbtxpJStDsMGdfwa5vv0b1YzdfL1tFg0y0+mFKUc4cKa+SpZ v9nLBEZSCCP54fJZ36j5krQuy3gRvL793Pmyrhq/xW6LmdnIcYtJ/HTd+Q3HG2PZcg 0UpG/R6z8gGsw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 471Bdj437Yz9rxG for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:00:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 09:59:39 +0100 From: Kai Mertens To: Subject: guix-install.sh: Fails to detect signing key on Debian10. Message-ID: <20191027095752.2b4d8975.kmx@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.67.36.66 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear GNU Guix developers, I just tried to install guix on top of a fresh debian10 system, which has been installed from debian-live-10.0.0-amd64-gnome.iso and updated. The guix install script fails in function chk_gpg_keyring(), although the key is present. If I remove the discard redirection >/dev/null 2>&1 from the gpg command, the following message occurs: gpg: keyblock resource '/root/.gnupg/pubring.kbx': No such file or directo= ry gpg: Fatal: /root/.gnupg: directory does not exist! Of course these files do not exist, as I imported the key to the user account, not to the root account. Then I executed the script as user, using sudo. This procedure works fine on trisquel7 or 8, but it fails on debian10. I wonder why =E2=80=98sudo gpg=E2=80=99 does not make a difference between = being called via sudo versus being called as root. Do I use debian the wrong way? best regards Kai --=20 Kai Mertens OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x40B15AB4B05B5BF1 on keys.gnupg.net Key fingerprint =3D 7C83 0A80 01FF 679C 6E8E AFD3 40B1 5AB4 B05B 5BF1 What is that? Please check: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/ --Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfIMKgAH/Z5xujq/TQLFatLBbW/EFAl21XHsACgkQQLFatLBb W/FefRAApEiOMID58UFXkMKpcOUiZdRpu69W2IbMb2/pXm3mJfJ/inmIqU/TVSyD /Xt3/vuy0YjoVJhkf35FYG7WAAy9/Yvfw6LEHDHJXQ5na/Cn+0JNuL46BkBBUcjx N59C+muL/n5Sz8SuIsrO1NY/ltNgBoYoQt1/yCa6m0xA1I0LHDQtKdtV6EAykia4 d3jDVB7G01UY4asm2rjXfelgypI/Yol8x0RciXXQzHZLKl25lqAob4IjG31sAQ1Z R8AVufgerQEk/+k1ysDPxbknRFCqUVZ810JPx/lohKH401V8SPrz4yGyhSQhhk20 XZ+8CmnAYmejDbGpzgj2+bfC9jsrdsH40DfqIthcYbjSLlPU7H1cbDCLCvTCiDIq a2utjUMymRDo+AYTIrSpDmx24NsJxLTm7PNqatwxqMjN50PPnkNerSSL2ltYvmes /oUc5cg3/PnHQvFPi8YRb5NqPuI75Tot5XnZJDnjRO75203iPwUXUnW26k49hfyt T8qYTGn2abkqBO9f6YStwpLejnNY1g4i0C3vqLdYj/StKsGaQlsj8sf+FlToA8kg C4Pzxke0SG16lftJPF05cv+23B03CJciqIlAvMTphzDCTsac7nFr34cGIdKUvesB DuwjDmSylNwQgnm2uwcGNduU+mb3UZvggtbX7zu7WisK9YgmHb0= =hD7n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/AsRnLHeDqdZnLI/FV7ZgDW8-- ------------=_1590106742-29489-1--