GNU bug report logs - #37930
26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 37930 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library'
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:10:00 +0300

> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: 37930 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > > You disagree that `seq library' doesn't belong.
> > > Fair enough.  Why do you think it belongs?
> > 
> > That's a wrong question, when talking about index entries.  the
> > important question is "is it useful?"
> 
> Fair enough.  Read it that way then, if you
> want to quibble.

"Quibble", thanks a lot.

> To me, it doesn't belong - it shouldn't be
> present, because I don't see it as especially
> useful.  But I'll be glad to learn how it is.

How else do you get to functions from that library in the manual?

> > Not obvious to you doesn't mean you should file a bug report, or that
> > we should continue discussing this.
> 
> I should file a bug report when I think it can
> help improve Emacs.  And that's what I do.
> 
> Please don't tell others when or whether they
> _should_ file bug reports.

Your bug report was considered and rejected.  Why do you continue
arguing instead of accepting the decision?  This is a recurring
pattern with you, and one that makes it so unnecessarily hard handling
your bug reports.  People avoid responding to your bug reports because
of that.  I myself sometimes avoid them.  This is unnecessary, and
actually harms Emacs.

Please consider not arguing about decisions to close your bug reports.

> You can close any report that you don't think is helpful.

I already did.  But it doesn't seem to help, not with bugs filed by
you.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.