Subject: bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library'

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:12:32 +0300

> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> > >  commentary, in a Lisp library
> > >  dynamic-library-alist
> > >  find library
> > >  image-load-path-for-library
> > >  library
> > >  library compilation
> > >  library header comments
> > >  library search
> > >  Lisp library
> > >  load-library
> > >  locate-library
> > >  seq library
> > >
> > > `seq library' does not belong here.
> > 
> > Disagree.  You are assessing index entries from
> > a completely wrong angle.
> 
> What angle is that?

That of consistency.  As expressed by "doesn't belong".

> You disagree that `seq library' doesn't belong.
> Fair enough.  Why do you think it belongs?

That's a wrong question, when talking about index entries.  the
important question is "is it useful?"

> Maybe there's a good reason for entry `seq
> library'.  It's not obvious to me.

Not obvious to you doesn't mean you should file a bug report, or that
we should continue discussing this.