From unknown Thu Jun 12 08:28:53 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#37876 <37876@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#37876 <37876@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge Reply-To: bug#37876 <37876@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:28:53 +0000 retitle 37876 Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge reassign 37876 guix submitter 37876 Carl Dong severity 37876 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 22 15:36:32 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2019 19:36:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60501 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzxI-0003zz-EX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:36:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzxG-0003zr-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:36:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzxD-0007Vx-HP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:36:30 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzxC-0005rj-3l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:36:27 -0400 Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]:63842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzxB-0005qe-O7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:36:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:36:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=carldong.me; s=protonmail; t=1571772980; bh=U/TGRZ7D/d/02OxFCFhsaotZulxrcVAE4OpCLpcD1/w=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Feedback-ID:From; b=T4QVrYCmDT0d+ZzPEOdWZ/pnNWoHqfRa+nusZnG57uB8u6JSittO2MwSRAQZncAt+ RbgQe05KOh/3By2c3dVvNrS2cvhMrf30SgAtJPq6W2HwDvXYWX+GzehmfWwq/O97Ti ivnldpXJ123wwdwjetdmDEcwPCBuzaplAHBaDxmM= To: "bug-guix@gnu.org" From: Carl Dong Subject: Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge Message-ID: Feedback-ID: a8j8tDUaJ4AYuDVBywMTwsJebN4w8TVXadJLsJb8td3t3dZi9RdXFlPaQvoFKnI9KgXySsPXcRkajVyY0cGTcA==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.132 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Carl Dong Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi all, I believe there's been a recent regression w/re MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN. I'm una= ble to guix build the following minimal reproducer: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (gnu packages commencement) (gnu packages gcc) (gnu packages base)) (make-gcc-toolchain gcc glibc-2.27) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- My guix describe output: Generation 33 Oct 22 2019 15:07:03 (current) guix f5d6c88 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git commit: f5d6c88d0f5e1556295c1a19c46ddfcb7a23107f The build failure logs can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/y7sg3m786ziiwvb/gcc-glibc-2.27-7.4.0.drv.log?dl= =3D0 Cheers, Carl Dong contact@carldong.me "I fight for the users" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 22 17:09:13 2019 Received: (at 37876) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2019 21:09:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iN1Oz-0006C5-9D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:09:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iN1Ox-0006Bq-N7 for 37876@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:09:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iN1Os-0005QH-Ch; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:09:06 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=49144 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iN1Or-0002Eg-3a; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:09:06 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Carl Dong Subject: Re: bug#37876: Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge References: Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:09:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Carl Dong's message of "Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:36:15 +0000") Message-ID: <874l00xzbl.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37876 Cc: 37876@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Carl Dong skribis: > I believe there's been a recent regression w/re MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN. I'm u= nable > to guix build the following minimal reproducer: > > (use-modules (gnu packages commencement) > (gnu packages gcc) > (gnu packages base)) > > (make-gcc-toolchain gcc glibc-2.27) > > My guix describe output: > Generation 33 Oct 22 2019 15:07:03 (current) > guix f5d6c88 > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > commit: f5d6c88d0f5e1556295c1a19c46ddfcb7a23107f > > The build failure logs can be found here: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/y7sg3m786ziiwvb/gcc-glibc-2.27-7.4.0.drv.log?dl= =3D0 So we see tons of things like: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- In file included from /gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.2= 7/include/bits/fcntl.h:61:0, from /gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.2= 7/include/fcntl.h:35, from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/system.h:349, from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/genchecksum.c:21: /gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/include/bits/fcntl-l= inux.h:355:27: warning: ISO C++ forbids zero-size array =E2=80=98f_handle= =E2=80=99 [-Wpedantic] unsigned char f_handle[0]; ^ In file included from ./bconfig.h:3:0, from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/genchecksum.c:20: ./auto-host.h:2363:16: error: declaration does not declare anything [-fperm= issive] #define rlim_t long ^ /gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/include/bits/resourc= e.h:131:18: note: in expansion of macro =E2=80=98rlim_t=E2=80=99 typedef __rlim_t rlim_t; ^~~~~~ [=E2=80=A6] ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/system.h:540:20: error: conflicting declaration of C fu= nction =E2=80=98const char* strsignal(int)=E2=80=99 extern const char *strsignal (int); ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from /gnu/store/x3jx25cd3q363mr7nbgzrhrv1vza6cf7-gcc-7.4.0= /include/c++/cstring:42:0, from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/system.h:235, from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/genhooks.c:21: /gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/include/string.h:446= :14: note: previous declaration =E2=80=98char* strsignal(int)=E2=80=99 extern char *strsignal (int __sig) __THROW; ^~~~~~~~~ [=E2=80=A6] In file included from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/genmodes.c:21:0: ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/system.h:488:14: error: conflicting declaration of C fu= nction =E2=80=98void* sbrk(int)=E2=80=99 extern void *sbrk (int); ^~~~ In file included from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/system.h:294:0, from ../../gcc-7.4.0/gcc/genmodes.c:21: /gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/include/unistd.h:104= 4:14: note: previous declaration =E2=80=98void* sbrk(intptr_t)=E2=80=99 extern void *sbrk (intptr_t __delta) __THROW; ^~~~ [=E2=80=A6] make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-gcc-glibc-2.27-7.4.0.drv-0/buil= d' make: *** [Makefile:934: all] Error 2 command "make" "-j" "48" "FLAGS_FOR_TARGET=3D-B/gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xv= lhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/lib" "LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=3D-B/gnu/store/5k8l1l6j= 8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/lib -Wl,-dynamic-linker -Wl,/gnu/store/= 5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" "LDFL= AGS=3D-Wl,-rpath=3D/gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glibc-2.27/l= ib -Wl,-dynamic-linker -Wl,/gnu/store/5k8l1l6j8sjws40xvlhs7hqjb68ylf7l-glib= c-2.27/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" "BOOT_CFLAGS=3D-O2 -g0" failed with status --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The =E2=80=98configure=E2=80=99 phase shows that =E2=80=98strsignal=E2=80= =99 and =E2=80=98sbrk=E2=80=99 were not quite found, but this is confusing: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- checking for strsignal... no checking for pstat_getstatic... yes checking for sysconf... no checking for realpath... yes checking for sysctl... yes checking for setrlimit... yes checking for sysmp... yes checking for sbrk... no checking for table... yes checking for spawnve... no checking for times... no checking for spawnvpe... yes checking for wait3... no checking for strerror... yes checking for wait4... yes checking for strsignal... yes [=E2=80=A6] checking whether sbrk is declared... yes --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Does it work with =E2=80=98glibc-2.28=E2=80=99? We=E2=80=99re not building any such toolchain in CI but we probably should= =E2=80=A6 Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 22 19:17:45 2019 Received: (at 37876) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2019 23:17:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60612 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iN3PN-0002tD-I0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:17:45 -0400 Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:45599) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iN3PK-0002sx-OI for 37876@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:17:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:17:30 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=carldong.me; s=protonmail; t=1571786256; bh=ypP5Bjq1xsJVuHWb2KohA2qWewplSzn+OQ5YxnBiiW8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=DfptHvAp30DUQvTsNkFkCElpPI+02A6MH6vVZhs3Sj7ePcnfXXxnceFEQi+1RABoe gT4u39b0ZnhAntrjrI3w+fkxWyIM1H+8u/QqdYBgpwkBYIJKqXvdhEGIA5WNpVX8dj jOlSl2mUX/0cYd/W9X4Dypz5oINg7NC6il+KFBNA= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: Carl Dong Subject: Re: bug#37876: Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <874l00xzbl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874l00xzbl.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: a8j8tDUaJ4AYuDVBywMTwsJebN4w8TVXadJLsJb8td3t3dZi9RdXFlPaQvoFKnI9KgXySsPXcRkajVyY0cGTcA==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37876 Cc: "37876@debbugs.gnu.org" <37876@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Carl Dong Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Ludo=E2=80=99, > Does it work with =E2=80=98glibc-2.28=E2=80=99? Curiously... glibc-2.28 also doesn't work: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ly7u4sf0umgz509/gcc-glibc-2.28-7.4.0.drv.log?dl= =3D1 > We=E2=80=99re not building any such toolchain in CI but we probably shoul= d=E2=80=A6 I think so too, happy to contribute a patch for the CI after we figure this= out. Cheers, Carl Dong contact@carldong.me "I fight for the users" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 23 11:30:33 2019 Received: (at 37876) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2019 15:30:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIan-0002bB-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:30:33 -0400 Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:56117) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIal-0002ay-E5 for 37876@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:30:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:30:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=carldong.me; s=protonmail; t=1571844624; bh=eearyifbwBckoh81FZDcMhM5yu7rJykSQMnMggnk7sI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=Tp6k24h+zQWZzacMbeCENN9nG+W2oaIs7VxiKFJIZgGQESSrJRgXi61dNqfcEtByz nKfI/rsIOfy6Wu86d++Bzuc/Utn6WL/wJRUTTikzWsi4/44/FF+jCmH/zuVLk2CWR1 loG2n6JMdorSUilIbzwPfYI210D82jzlMOKMt5kM= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: Carl Dong Subject: Re: bug#37876: Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <874l00xzbl.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: a8j8tDUaJ4AYuDVBywMTwsJebN4w8TVXadJLsJb8td3t3dZi9RdXFlPaQvoFKnI9KgXySsPXcRkajVyY0cGTcA==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37876 Cc: "37876@debbugs.gnu.org" <37876@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Carl Dong Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi all, Looking closer at the code, the regression seems to be in MAKE-GCC-LIBC in = (gnu packages base), rather than in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN. New minimal reproducer: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (gnu packages commencement) (gnu packages gcc) (gnu packages base)) (make-gcc-libc gcc glibc-2.28) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Cheers, Carl Dong contact@carldong.me "I fight for the users" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 24 07:57:51 2021 Received: (at 37876) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 11:57:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mec8N-0006R6-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:57:51 -0400 Received: from mail-bn7nam10olkn2056.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.40.56]:1729 helo=NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mec8K-0006Qr-Tr for 37876@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:57:49 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gCaGU0lDh/XfX81Ju7Gx1PW/yUakDoeQrazcTmNJMd6UZZdyx6+AtEVlbuORC3rb/TSisVCT7visinOG72MxEHeWbzv6gw56cupXjRaH/pLoiX+oOKTjHwYiEDO7yaI7IPCrSHWdRKQ7GTzW4kQrlb3f7fgpiPMLLTJhgLpzdr7HYQU5nZx1A3BIfqTRwJXKMuk3AnvCAO3LNo6eQyMsq2wPmps74j5q49vLXzEZmg9Kowvd0AUYsuNe7hDPaUvnSR2h/pQDRdFs8Y9QD3KXkeT923oHWnWZuaIW72BdMHnIZIMooNKYuIT0DU+VjNd+xY9Qegm9QW9FvuuZj/Ccxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=X4EwLxteRinM3vFjssMKAvDju6PGBHO+dQe7aofaH60=; b=NVjCWufCBEKxC6jLx2xEPq4HsAj4GVzm467ARpYyojf+01SLuXmQAyER6G4cOyn8/aCSKTAQbMlkKt8RU0ZvK4vmgoe4wv0yHvKnefC6QxlxmhGNYjkhce/4+qki396nha40+4bTvpP/opSzQvnIeThw8pWLUVIahXP6aQ2Tp1kTvoJ5yV73mlOx17Wvmf68h8LVbAdPa2iCQGCzgibK8Oivj8ZCuwPbmVNE0Hc03T9ouBScVSM3RH1wOiM285F9fkbddQ2HxBHtzMrEBjK8EGki16lP5B9qSL/RnIcjXMzZ/kuEmP6Bl2JF0ZmQPNrJWuSe4j3USOSxn8MQpkW4jA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=X4EwLxteRinM3vFjssMKAvDju6PGBHO+dQe7aofaH60=; b=Ms1brEjQD7MiXlmdP2eUGSaFUqlsKQMMlbuCbYxgheD8U0dOGBN25y5p29+Tg5GSf13ry6Jjpbwp4qCKJTBapBUScluNa0cN8u6k4ihV92/9m1L2XwFKYq3gQetz3hjlrAyBp4XHkiwlAmfgqXWSCDZoBIJ41EVtAQcrY5dC7AtVtX66Mrk3UDJWU/CdOLfFz9i5rj4tLxqnzfrfIQRrroWGj9mNxnCLLRdMogHRNz9rUXUrKFSYrIVSv4Cq5La1d8ohodURMQwzYoQ2yO6sw2/Dfjjzzws7fNJcB/t49pdSQ1EFXrY/vQrUQIDlayYSUwE8nd773mD/uRVeZKF0/g== Received: from BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:87::30) by BYAPR05MB5928.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:d0::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4649.10; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 11:57:42 +0000 Received: from BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::745d:ce8d:67ec:5154]) by BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::745d:ce8d:67ec:5154%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4628.018; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 11:57:42 +0000 From: Morgan Smith To: Carl Dong Subject: Re: bug#37876: Regression in MAKE-GCC-TOOLCHAIN after core-updates merge References: <874l00xzbl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:57:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carl Dong's message of "Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:30:22 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: text/plain X-TMN: [Ph6f3BFIipf6EuZDt/kSy2uI71E6cSgf] X-ClientProxiedBy: YQXPR0101CA0068.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:14::45) To BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:87::30) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87y26i8wjx.fsf@outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from workpad (170.52.80.188) by YQXPR0101CA0068.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00:14::45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4628.18 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 11:57:41 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 60c4579a-a4f3-4e5c-7c93-08d996e57bd9 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BYAPR05MB5928: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 60c4579a-a4f3-4e5c-7c93-08d996e57bd9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2021 11:57:42.2132 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5928 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37876 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , "37876@debbugs.gnu.org" <37876@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I tried this today as of commit 49d19b35cebd749510b7dddd773d76a3a96d1358 and it seems to build. Are you still experiencing this issue? Morgan