GNU bug report logs - #37850
Glib documentation is missing

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 37850 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37850: Glib documentation is missing
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 20:04:28 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> From 893613a3b99c20688cc331d2926dbee28cc143d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 17:36:17 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add glib-minimal and build glib doc.
>
> glib documentation must be built with gtk-doc which in turn depends on glib,
> so we need to define glib-minimal which does not depend on gtk-doc.
>
> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib-minimal): New variable.
> (glib)[source]: Don't use `name'.
> * gnu/packages/avahi.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.
> * gnu/packages/cups.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.
> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.
> * gnu/packages/graphviz.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.
> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.
> * gnu/packages/inkscape.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.
> * gnu/packages/pdf.scm: Use glib-minimal when necessary.

Please mention all changed variables and inputs here, as we always do.

That said, I'm not certain this is a good solution.  Why do some
packages use glib-minimal and others not?  What does "necessary" mean in
this context?

What about 'hiding' the normal glib package, and expose a
'glib-with-documentation' variant to end users, similar to how the
'cmake' package works?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.