From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:28:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 37831 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 37831@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.157157015416707 (code B ref -1); Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 11:15:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bh-0004KJ-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58793) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bg-0004Iq-6g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Be-00065O-D2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bc-00043j-5q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:50 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:43973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bb-00040s-P9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:48 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.151.76 Received: from bababa (lfbn-1-4156-76.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.151.76]) (Authenticated sender: pierre@atlas.engineer) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22ADC240003 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:15:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:15:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.193 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window managers. After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigure', GDM also suggests GNOME. If I select it, it fails to log in, which I suppose is expected since it's not installed. I believe the GNOME entry in GDM should only appear if GNOME is installed. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl2sQd0ACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9tZwgAqHrmKUwJ9tjmgQfdCWQrPvoALiGRlvG0zHKzcrN/nQEALk3VLQAr+vrb qx9It0YZrug+XPWwdaWLHk2fZOh2CujhCA0Ix7awQ/ENf9CBplKfXMwJKtYRSE4j V6kdix7PAAt6okwCRsZ5hVWT37G1cdBCXOreUvWn3qY864x8wwZk5OESJo6btVwt RFf5S4JHDwmw59eu7vC4ihqQ4UufviXpqNl637K5n3PSC3H6wSEtGTP6t0x8JUyt JcgS0h3z569jG8ZAY0u7vgIn5JuNmTOyry3RHht8Ez7oyLqv/KHzhp/XtVobfzPI mcb4kPRhjYNwrUSRXupCedl47xz6iA== =UWz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:28:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37831 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 37831@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 37831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37831.158170767532174 (code B ref 37831); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 37831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2020 19:14:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2gQ7-0008Ms-9V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:14:35 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com ([209.85.222.170]:41918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2gQ5-0008Mc-2c for 37831@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:14:33 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d11so10238533qko.8 for <37831@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:14:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=AMScvznVGtMO2kGeNWNbH+6hBwSIBFSW+mCBFl4ywcg=; b=L4KappvTGI0gtB+blwoPWlA+voPQuoNWs2Lx9tDJB8TkydgjKslEUs/ekjsYRZcKDS c5r8ThH07g+nFpHd2xfz51PutAw3Zp4PGkGADfErzpNa5AO4hhB0xPq9OYuPGmAN6tZh 7f9VAfGHZm8U6/Z0uF5DnxDjE7Qq44GCBIaCUehdF6Iddeu9+/9JNQLpkdSDKNSZVib9 T01siik/zQlfejkir0HhdaU/34Exbfvym9vdGs/tj/fzyugL2Sg+Puk0VxuhLpNWhCsj s28LNAQtVVRvG90Ae9yBd4Tr0LQCsB1RNqTtCzmaWdp2UVoO6RMUB9evX1l365hkvmkG 5LkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=AMScvznVGtMO2kGeNWNbH+6hBwSIBFSW+mCBFl4ywcg=; b=KpOonkmM+psp5Eh7yFNrKXQhMSvIXmXuBIC4834LW/qvmYbgL3b2TGCcREUXdL3pzC /rztEPnH5XlD5Kr7mN4WjJHVnlqNNCUZxBI0zqPqA1IlCy+pEhhwXPR58OYh4LRmPW3t eEVog5gCEqQ4QQI0+eZ4wbcIf5Nr38E0FNqm1AqQ824YkN5BUQ/TftUak6H8j36XII/P N7+L8rmAYuYDrcwqtJDiZpLmk09c6iC0ETzUHOffmfUXLINa5EMbxUPaPRIqL6GQBRrc Rjp9q8rop+/+xcYN05k6OAXJbWtBSlHrmxm39/ryDJnk62dsodg8Fs4wOoereXZcoVTf RdGg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXL5EX/rGPm5fjw/sAupSW98r+X3ypMqBKznLzp5R8JVjnIae3g sM5dhXYrcRrzxyj8SsRFsOf+IDC2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzjdKTwoDin4d9MHVrduCyzTVHsS1HobCXRlqhMlYwngX+XYJoKCFIGb//3xpakXekO6SRI/g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:14a2:: with SMTP id x2mr4153317qkj.36.1581707667459; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwak ([2607:fad8:4:6:afc9:fe0d:91fc:113b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e64sm3706832qtd.45.2020.02.14.11.14.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:14:26 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:14:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:15:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7ztj81a.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt writes: > My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. > Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window > managers. > > After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigu [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.5 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.222.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.222.170 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) Pierre Neidhardt writes: > My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. > Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window > managers. > > After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigure', GDM > also suggests GNOME. If I select it, it fails to log in, which I > suppose is expected since it's not installed. > > I believe the GNOME entry in GDM should only appear if GNOME is installed. I can confirm the issue, attempting to use GDM + ratpoison (without GNOME installed). Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 11 06:31:31 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2020 10:31:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNDQB-0005Q9-Ai for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 06:31:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57979) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNDQ8-0005Ps-QH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 06:31:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNDQ3-0001fB-Mq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 06:31:23 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37542 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jNDQ2-000390-T4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 06:31:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:31:20 +0200 Message-Id: <875ze6titj.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #37831 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) severity 37831 important quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:28:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37831 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 37831@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 37831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37831.158662271829659 (code B ref 37831); Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 37831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2020 16:31:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNJ30-0007iJ-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:31:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNJ2y-0007i6-Q8 for 37831@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:31:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNJ2t-00068s-Kv; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:31:51 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=39478 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jNJ2s-0003iH-7g; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:31:50 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:31:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:15:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87blnyrnkb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. > Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window > managers. > > After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigu [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. > Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window > managers. > > After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigure', GDM > also suggests GNOME. If I select it, it fails to log in, which I > suppose is expected since it's not installed. > > I believe the GNOME entry in GDM should only appear if GNOME is installed. I investigated this issue. =E2=80=98collect_sessions=E2=80=99 in =E2=80=98gdm-sessions.c=E2=80=99 does= this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- const char *xorg_search_dirs[] =3D { "/etc/X11/sessions/", DMCONFDIR "/Sessions/", DATADIR "/gdm/BuiltInSessions/", DATADIR "/xsessions/", NULL }; xorg_search_array =3D g_array_new (TRUE, TRUE, sizeof (char *)); const gchar * const *system_data_dirs =3D g_get_system_data_dirs (); for (i =3D 0; system_data_dirs[i]; i++) { session_dir =3D g_build_filename (system_data_dirs[i], "xsessions",= NULL); g_array_append_val (xorg_search_array, session_dir); } g_array_append_vals (xorg_search_array, xorg_search_dirs, G_N_ELEMENTS (xor= g_search_dirs)); if (gdm_available_sessions_map =3D=3D NULL) { gdm_available_sessions_map =3D g_hash_table_new_full (g_str_hash, g= _str_equal, g_free, (GDestr= oyNotify)gdm_session_file_free); } for (i =3D 0; i < xorg_search_array->len; i++) { collect_sessions_from_directory (g_array_index (xorg_search_array, = gchar*, i)); } --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- =E2=80=98gnome-desktop.desktop=E2=80=99, which contains the GNOME entry, is= picked up from $(guix build gnome-session)/share/xsessions, which happens to be one of the =E2=80=98system_data_dirs=E2=80=99 elements (via $XDG_DATA_DIR). So I thought that setting: system_data_dirs =3D { NULL }; would solve the issue. Alas, it seems that when we do that, either the array remains empty or somehow =E2=80=98collect_sessions_from_directory=E2= =80=99 is not called. I can=E2=80=99t attach GDM though, or I don=E2=80=99t know what to attach i= t to=E2=80=A6 Ideas anyone? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:28:08 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: bug#37831: closed (Re: bug#37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed) Message-ID: References: <87wo6lr79d.fsf@gnu.org> <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 37831 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 37831@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 22:25:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1586643902-28609-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1586643902-28609-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 37831@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 37831: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D37831 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1586643902-28609-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 37831-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2020 22:24:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNOXr-0007QO-Gd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:24:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNOXq-0007QD-2A for 37831-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:24:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNOXk-0001VU-7K; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:24:04 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=36118 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jNOXg-0002sb-Jd; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 18:24:03 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed References: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 00:23:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:15:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87wo6lr79d.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. > Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window > managers. > > After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigu [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37831-done Cc: 37831-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. > Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window > managers. > > After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigure', GDM > also suggests GNOME. If I select it, it fails to log in, which I > suppose is expected since it's not installed. > > I believe the GNOME entry in GDM should only appear if GNOME is installed. Alright, I eventually succeeded and pushed a fix as f4ec5e1a9823a66c27fe2bc033db7b58b29edfef (=E2=80=98version-1.1.0=E2=80=99; = will merge later on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99). Woohoo! AFAICS it works as advertised, but please report any issues! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1586643902-28609-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 11:15:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bh-0004KJ-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58793) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bg-0004Iq-6g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Be-00065O-D2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bc-00043j-5q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:50 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:43973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bb-00040s-P9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:15:48 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.151.76 Received: from bababa (lfbn-1-4156-76.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.151.76]) (Authenticated sender: pierre@atlas.engineer) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22ADC240003 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:15:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:15:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.193 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My config.scm installs EXWM + StumpWM, but not GNOME. Before the last core-update, GDM would only suggest the 2 window managers. After a recent Guix pull followed by a `guix system reconfigure', GDM also suggests GNOME. If I select it, it fails to log in, which I suppose is expected since it's not installed. I believe the GNOME entry in GDM should only appear if GNOME is installed. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl2sQd0ACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9tZwgAqHrmKUwJ9tjmgQfdCWQrPvoALiGRlvG0zHKzcrN/nQEALk3VLQAr+vrb qx9It0YZrug+XPWwdaWLHk2fZOh2CujhCA0Ix7awQ/ENf9CBplKfXMwJKtYRSE4j V6kdix7PAAt6okwCRsZ5hVWT37G1cdBCXOreUvWn3qY864x8wwZk5OESJo6btVwt RFf5S4JHDwmw59eu7vC4ihqQ4UufviXpqNl637K5n3PSC3H6wSEtGTP6t0x8JUyt JcgS0h3z569jG8ZAY0u7vgIn5JuNmTOyry3RHht8Ez7oyLqv/KHzhp/XtVobfzPI mcb4kPRhjYNwrUSRXupCedl47xz6iA== =UWz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1586643902-28609-1-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:28:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#37831: GDM has a GNOME entry even when not installed Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 07:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37831 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 37831-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 37831-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D37831.158667793924825 (code D ref 37831); Sun, 12 Apr 2020 07:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 37831-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2020 07:52:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNXPf-0006SK-F7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 03:52:19 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:55827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNXPd-0006S7-Rn for 37831-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 03:52:18 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 78.199.129.170 Received: from mimimi (moi44-1-78-199-129-170.fbx.proxad.net [78.199.129.170]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 262DD60005; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 07:52:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87wo6lr79d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lftfd5wi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo6lr79d.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 09:52:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87eestgmza.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.195 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.195 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl6SyKkACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8WRggAntf+cGCk53FkDD6gsI9fBB/5yYpS2n54ephNgJJuZe0feg4u06N8bEsY DhmET7r3fMR8r4tu0EBeEMWfy/nt5i+5JXRZ9B6xvgy4P5u4WuMeteyJzT6SPqez SliWHGBRSZGM3ZOCJnOSErCT207J2ZRFyntkJGheQS4zaTsZnlubiGLXF+T7kjvW mEeR2s1e0egODxuFF24BqCfvlBsufz0Z1nzZ26bcAQd7sYzGsPsHGTAkY1LIhj3r mas2rbec0whXSRxQu+B7van/m6jo/MBi9Y1KBtnBUQ+LcGZpJFc56Gn8otDyWd3t LDWJ34JnLkfP7JkychA2Z3qZFXSW1g== =ou+C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--