GNU bug report logs - #37790
MANPATH missing from non-default profile

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: 37790 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,  Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 37790-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37790: MANPATH missing from non-default profile
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:32:50 +0100

Hi Maxim,

On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 07:26, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> tags 37790 notabug

From my understanding, it is a "bug" as explained here:

1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/37790#2>

Or at least an inconvenient behaviour. :-)


> >> I agree it’s inconvenient, but how would you add an exception?
> >
> > I'm not too sure how Guix works here, but what about when building the
> > profile, systematically populating etc/profile with MANPATH=...?
>
> I don't think special casing ~/.guix-profile like this, polluting other
> profiles is a good idea.

It appears to me the contrary, no?  That ~/.guix-profile is special here.

Well, using a multi-profiles style management, it appears to me
adequate to install "man" (or man-db) once, i.e.,  in one profile say
~/.cache/guix/profiles/utilities, and then install other packages, say
git, in another profile, say ~/, .cache/guix/profiles/tools, etc.

With the current design, each profile other than ~/.guix-profile
requires 'man-db' which seems unfortunate, non?


Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.