GNU bug report logs - #37693
Seahorse build

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: Miguel Arruga Vivas <rosen644835 <at> gmail.com>, 37693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#37693] Seahorse build
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:22:16 +0200

Am Montag, den 21.10.2019, 17:25 +0200 schrieb Miguel Arruga Vivas:
> > > >      (inputs
> > > > -     `(("gtk+" ,gtk+)
> > > > +     `(("avahi" ,avahi)
> > > > +       ("gtk+" ,gtk+)
> > > >         ("gcr" ,gcr)
> > > >         ("gnupg" ,gnupg)
> > > >         ("gpgme" ,gpgme)
> > > > @@ -2244,8 +2248,10 @@ engineering.")
> > > >      (native-inputs
> > > >       `(("intltool" ,intltool)
> > > >         ("glib:bin" ,glib "bin")
> > > > +       ("gtk+:bin" ,gtk+ "bin")
> > > >         ("itstool" ,itstool)
> > > >         ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> > > > +       ("vala" ,vala)
> > > 
> > > Likewise, these changes were necessary, right?
> > 
> > Indeed. After changing the build system, I've repeatedly run "guix
> > build seahorse" and added the inputs that the build system
> > complained
> > about until the build succeeded. ("gtk+:bin" is necessary due to
> > the
> > icon cache IIRC).
> 
> I've solved this modifying the %standard-phases, as in other packages
> from gnome.
I'm not sure, whether that is the right approach. Seahorse used glib-
or-gtk-build-system before, so I would assume the generation of those
caches is expected.

> I don't have the last one because it is fixed with 3.30.1.1.  Also, I
> have an extra python that could be a leftover.
Would you mind checking, whether your patch works with gtk+:bin added
and without python? If so, I'd find it preferable to mine.

Regards,

Leo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.