From unknown Sun Jun 15 10:54:16 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#37591 <37591@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#37591 <37591@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Ring big alarms when slipped a 'Mail-Copies-To: never' header Reply-To: bug#37591 <37591@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 17:54:16 +0000 retitle 37591 Ring big alarms when slipped a 'Mail-Copies-To: never' header reassign 37591 emacs,gnus submitter 37591 =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson severity 37591 wishlist tag 37591 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 02 15:26:35 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2019 19:26:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFkGf-0002YR-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:26:35 -0400 Received: from bongo.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.21]:44659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFkGZ-0002YE-Pm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:26:29 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF952C2BEF for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-86-26.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.86.26]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 072312C247E for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:26:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a84.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.5); Wed, 02 Oct 2019 19:26:26 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Fearful-Zesty: 27d307713955bc2a_1570044383420_1860154733 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1570044383420:2138993367 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1570044383420 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C6F7F06C for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 12:26:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=z6F++9VHdBylpjbMHf 5h9JadpH8=; b=NcIRQTve/LjEjb/CRO82dkAUBn7VPagsMw5kqptNz+to01WeNl eHvwqTZHEOpLBQHHCEAzR9eMfN7DYep8zv38yVgmkPdmEGELg01BJZCVHiMFnCWG EsLxNzFR2WZlaag9sd/dZo2fYWkidoO0IVIpY64iv2gnpPye2UhTg23p0= Received: from jidanni.org (220-140-2-24.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [220.140.2.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E1777F07C for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 12:26:16 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a84 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) Subject: Ring big alarms when slipped a 'Mail-Copies-To: never' header X-Debbugs-Version: 5.13 X-Debbugs-Package: emacs,gnus Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 03:26:13 +0800 Message-ID: <875zl7ne3u.2.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrgeeigddufeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkgggtgfesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnjjnnjcuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqnecukfhppedvvddtrddugedtrddvrddvgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpedvvddtrddugedtrddvrddvgedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppeeruhhtfhdqkeerueerheeimhfphefnihehhegsveekreepucffrghnucflrggtohgsshhonhcuoehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjihgurghnnhhisehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehsuhgsmhhithesuggvsggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Big problem! Let's say we get this mail From: Robert Pluim To: =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, 34130@deb= bugs.gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Well, causally hitting S W to reply to all gives us a buffer with: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, 34130@debbugs.gnu.org From: =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson Do you see the problem? Gnus has blindly picked the **first** person from the CC list to become the single To: person. Yes, a proper mail needs a To: person. But it is a massive mistake to pick one of the equal Cc: people to be the new To: person. It was just like we were set up to redirect our anger at somebody else via the silent booby trap Mail-Copies-To: never ! Solution: make all the people of the former Cc: and To: list now all equa= lly represented in a new single To: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, 34130@deb= bugs.gnu.org Simple! Furthermore, definitely give a warning: '"Mail-Copies-To: never" header detected. Honor? [Y,n,?]' And what if there were no Cc's or other To's .... Anyway, the idea is to warn the user that he in now replying to someone e= lse. Also to eliminate making it look like we have chosen a special bystander to now direct our wrath at instead of equally distributing it. Gnus v5.13 GNU Emacs 26.3 (build 2, i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.11) of 2019-09-23, modified by Debian From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 17:00:03 2019 Received: (at 37591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 21:00:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7Ri-0000yD-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:00:03 -0400 Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=40172 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7Rf-0000xZ-Kj for 37591@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:00:00 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7Ra-00047t-3F; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:59:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#37591: Ring big alarms when slipped a 'Mail-Copies-To: never' header References: <875zl7ne3u.2.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:59:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875zl7ne3u.2.fsf@jidanni.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuepjeS4ueWwvA==?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Thu, 03 Oct 2019 03:26:13 +0800") Message-ID: <87lftnt54m.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > Let's say we get this mail > > From: Robert Pluim > To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, > 34130@debbug [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > Let's say we get this mail > > From: Robert Pluim > To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, > 34130@debbug [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37591 Cc: 37591@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > Let's say we get this mail > > From: Robert Pluim > To: =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, > 34130@debbugs.gnu.org > Mail-Copies-To: never > > Well, causally hitting S W to reply to all gives us a buffer with: > > To: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 6615@debbugs.gnu.org, 34130@debbugs.gnu.org > From: =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson > > Do you see the problem? Yeah, that's perhaps not optimal, and since it's valid to put several addresses in the To header, perhaps the best solution is (as you suggest) just to put all of them in the To header. Does anybody have an opinion here? > Furthermore, definitely give a warning: > '"Mail-Copies-To: never" header detected. Honor? [Y,n,?]' > > And what if there were no Cc's or other To's .... I don't think that's an issue -- it'll just use it in that case, if I remember correctly. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 06 09:54:02 2020 Received: (at 37591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 13:54:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gLK-0007RQ-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:54:02 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gLJ-0007Qt-3H for 37591@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:54:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VDPgMHwH9LwRyTooQMpdC74ijz8KCtoSDpSH+ZGl0r4=; b=i1iNFkXamh/5ekZLrnJsfoZ17/ 8eYKAtKvyeYntjeXW4C4WbeOmaolt6BmogQvpCltJ4BZMDhcq4oVvQ79l82AlEPv8mqmAj/kE0BYC 5SC0cCB5JrTvL+SIwvoNA259N6dFZ7Z/bkxdkLdCMR4cvT7Xb+5aQY7dPcUnW7phEB3s=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gLA-000258-2W; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:53:54 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#37591: Ring big alarms when slipped a 'Mail-Copies-To: never' header References: <875zl7ne3u.2.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lftnt54m.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:53:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lftnt54m.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:59:53 +0200") Message-ID: <87wo2bc235.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Yeah, that's perhaps not optimal, and since it's valid to put several > addresses in the To header, perhaps the best solution is (as you > suggest) just to put all of them in the To header. > > Does [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37591 Cc: 37591@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Yeah, that's perhaps not optimal, and since it's valid to put several > addresses in the To header, perhaps the best solution is (as you > suggest) just to put all of them in the To header. > > Does anybody have an opinion here? Nobody had, so I've now done this change in Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 06 09:54:08 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 13:54:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gLP-0007Ri-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:54:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gLO-0007R7-R7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:54:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=E7koteE70IVjax8+8+g2yKTMwgUYUT6DvVvBs+o+xFM=; b=N31tNEA3UVCQwGlFdw3KaKE29j VEUzMoVpPMR5mlpbX75+FLXHBQtzchMRWJlyg1GYELTSedOJZTTjaSD29RHVGJK6+xgSpBmDmw/VM kZvbljD4sjV5Gf9GoOeXsEEu0+LTVbKoTDVQkyvLBEdexfkZEK5wkN5OdriVZ3aXw8jQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gLH-00025E-0f for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:54:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:53:57 +0200 Message-Id: <87v9hvc22y.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #37591 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 37591 fixed close 37591 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 37591 fixed close 37591 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 06 10:48:01 2020 Received: (at 37591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 14:48:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3hBY-0002tK-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:48:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com ([209.85.128.53]:55035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3hBW-0002t6-2f for 37591@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:47:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id d190so9074707wmd.4 for <37591@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:47:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eXtsShpvYHb14m5leQFZQaMxOLsLcM3ubY4RCdyFks4=; b=FU7tCbFG3//K9hfrWVy+XEkoEnkkHCoRntIYrmfQK1tdOuNi11nmoD2SP6qIH6IyvZ u65wjgpM/xcp6pTVp5ywbj3c2geImEr/jOk/Kgy7RkxHsbcufaaytSN2s3sbKjJx/TOF 3U5tTMyvFSa3X4ur8zAOcNq3vC671OT+N4IG9Nh+uN3cBNmYNZjdHyqUGjpsFA+2PdrZ 6aIPoekf16MJQbzr5jlmRnDZ18SkEi2QIXos6dXfkA/l1EWJdlcC4TaNWfOMiJc97c+M EOL5Lt27MVZZw/vKEEIOS8FHPf2pWM8WRdshf0NA+BSOvHL2B/Ttd9tSn4i+GmH8HIUH Ul8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eXtsShpvYHb14m5leQFZQaMxOLsLcM3ubY4RCdyFks4=; b=cI14M9aTEYQo1dYUN7zDZvtl/jbzOs7Ukb8PVWf9a1P9qy+HIzRKQBNFSp+GQ25yIo TVxEySlzpMKnaKEBSvK5HnjB0ZxW4HRXDvFPgaF4X317h3sz4obfW8qf2vrPQ5k42kU9 Vf20S99NZAZEBYuH8OhgwoWq7/txd68Ju58a3VzCpcwKKIdaS1dkhQVMmDKfZElg4qXZ M96yQ2EDB5Z7hiwyPBbbmJ1KUaleBrWQREaubEhjxzj+Qigp7KlStmfWndjs4QTIZ/5O djF4Geh7sRnYI49e0aLzpEmsgNMMumV25vsYVRxc359aWDfp5xOa7AKUep7x+aMjjYre +5WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530L9gF3Voqc5ggCjZ2CICzNCt1eHgq32gZXzPiqSVrW1JogA7eW qLHjzsTEcQ5pj2GgebdyBt0RGqHJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8ZU0SUZzTdexhDll2xyWIHjiQkRaF2PmVMX2TfnnC7K/QxO2HTFFlAKZOu0BosQECv1gFBg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:740e:: with SMTP id p14mr8092352wmc.179.1596725271843; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rpluim-mac (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d21sm6754776wmd.41.2020.08.06.07.47.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:47:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Pluim To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#37591: Ring big alarms when slipped a 'Mail-Copies-To: never' header References: <875zl7ne3u.2.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lftnt54m.fsf@gnus.org> <87wo2bc235.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:47:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wo2bc235.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:53:50 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37591 Cc: 37591@debbugs.gnu.org, =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2020 15:53:50 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen said: Lars> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> Yeah, that's perhaps not optimal, and since it's valid to put several >> addresses in the To header, perhaps the best solution is (as you >> suggest) just to put all of them in the To header. >>=20 >> Does anybody have an opinion here? I used to have one, but I=CA=BCve given up on Mail-Copies-To: never, since there are too many broken mua's out there (which combined with people who do 'reply all' when they should 'reply to sender' and 'reply to sender' when they should 'reply all' just makes me despair for the human race). Lars> Nobody had, so I've now done this change in Emacs 28. OK. Robert From unknown Sun Jun 15 10:54:16 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator