GNU bug report logs - #37584
[PATCH] Quadruple term-buffer-maximum-size

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37584: closed ([PATCH] Quadruple term-buffer-maximum-size)
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:21:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 7 Oct 2019 12:19:39 +0200
with message-id <CADwFkmnEHNp5VUOCo=xnxwWX98o4PtNLWue0sx5QTACC7nN8Kw <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#37584: [PATCH] Quadruple term-buffer-maximum-size
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #37584,
regarding [PATCH] Quadruple term-buffer-maximum-size
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
37584: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37584
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Quadruple term-buffer-maximum-size
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:52:33 +0200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

term-buffer-maximum-size has been 2048 since 1997:

commit ce0ba762d737cd36b20513cd6d9540643524c581
Author: Richard M. Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
Date:   Wed Apr 2 03:46:39 1997 +0000

I think we have more memory nowadays, and a more reasonable default
would probably be 8192.

Any objections to doing this?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

[0001-Quadruple-term-buffer-maximum-size.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 37584-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37584: [PATCH] Quadruple term-buffer-maximum-size
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 12:19:39 +0200

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> > I think we have more memory nowadays, and a more reasonable default
> > would probably be 8192.
>
> Makes sense to me.

Thanks, pushed to master as commit 130b1321ed.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.