GNU bug report logs - #37562
26.2; Obsolete vt-control and vt100-led

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Nicolas Semrau <nicolas.semrau <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:17:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 26.2

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #28 received at 37562 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Semrau <nicolas.semrau <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 37562 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#37562: 26.2; Obsolete vt-control and vt100-led
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:45:10 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> There's no tangible benefit in obsoleting these tiny files.

So files like this will probably stay in the codebase indefinitely?

I am aware that they do not make Emacs "worse", performance-wise. I
just think linting files for those unused stone-age systems is
beneficial at least in the sense of alleviating a certain "museum
piece vibe" of Emacs.
Am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019 um 10:58 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:

> > From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:02:35 +0100
> > Cc: nicolas.semrau <at> gmail.com, 37562 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> >       Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> >
> > Would it make sense to mark them as obsolete and if anyone complains
> > to create a new ELPA package for them instead?  We could even say in
> > NEWS that, in case anyone is still using this, we would appreciate it
> > if they reported back to emacs-devel or somesuch.  (I think I've seen
> > that being done once before, so there is some precedent.)
> >
> > My objective in writing this is to figure out a way forward for the
> > original request/suggestion, but I don't feel very strongly about it.
> > However, if we can't find a reasonable way to do this, or if we don't
> > want to, I think we're better off closing this as wontfix.
>
> I prefer the latter.  This issue is so minor that we've already
> invested way too much energy in it.  There's no tangible benefit in
> obsoleting these tiny files.
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 104 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.