GNU bug report logs - #37556
gpg "-unknown" version string

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:01:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 27.0.50

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 37556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37556: gpg "-unknown" version string
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:42:29 +0200
Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> If this is somehow related to gpg, maybe we should chop that before
>>> we invoke the version-comparison functions, in gpg-related Lisp files
>>> only?
>>
>> Chopping would mean that 2.2.17 and 2.2.17-unknown are equal, but currently
>> 2.2.17-unknown (in epg) is less than 2.2.17.
>
> I don't understand why making -unknown equivalent to a lesser version
> makes sense.  Shouldn't 2.2.17 and 2.2.17-unknown in fact be equal?

Should they?  2.2.17-pre and 2.2.17-alpha should be less than 2.2.17,
but how do we know that -unknown isn't something -alpha-ish?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 280 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.