From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 26 10:30:15 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 14:30:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDUmZ-0000uu-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:30:15 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDUDt-00047D-Aj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:54:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDUDr-0004hg-Np for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:54:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDUDq-0002y5-CE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:54:19 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.40]:1824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDUDq-0002xF-2w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:54:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF6240D70 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:54:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= mime-version:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :subject:subject:message-id:received:received:received; s= dkim20160331; t=1569506056; x=1571320457; bh=Kk7C2ib1uY8uGqhlu+b wDlHtzVmDuwuAHkJjt8/E0JU=; b=e3tHZTIYLOY0re1gybHbX8FXOxWRxg7Ir2+ CnbYPzz0g9MRmVucVo3hn0+0wIpKbd4Fq0F2hfUWYSnZsPevg60NslK8/Eshm9YX /fBU+84xKBPm6OXyLRCyPN7qeyGjskvIU+2PXGMQkz94CiCwE+RjnhDaAdbPq8tm UYLF3rZTZHrUjG7KUSltG9l/X2RUoROFiApN/GnSTRpcA2026GHOEJHoyhBKPCHH CPFq5PUFlQlR1ZC9Iqct+mIF48d2FxehlyivoDm0SZmOt4GLLLDzHPlsQEM5JbSy RtV3GnJrsb4yWv6vhPP20oW3EqkekRIKEL+y+BvmL0cRpdwjOXCNC6nQWWOlLfMD ivvkylUWFM+WbT6eFSJ9WbSn9EJbcRcKNIMYE7+zHdOMbDdBoi7Dh/afLyoa39tJ aEJ1FJKMHs/u2MduDrZ5V1+SuwlUO4lAOVLH/bXTb4i2QLXHLixUM0koW3pIDd+2 6/HxEb1SJsjKczRw2iuyXUrsdcqB1pYXKGmCiLPYltFzM4JXM6bVBJWfzXXwYcVM pWnvkWWsbcu2wFsYitrxMszMJpFe+Hpxe4PgP7SYVwj5CURIzMWMe6XKFO9GMj8D 0Tv9OSRxBCNU0ThYbfXjdV54n1IjoODE6s2jcxDBmUHZFDgTLqz1oacN2bVVrC5g kIfG5Fzc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gCZOKnABILne for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:54:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B43408C7 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.3]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCEE22577 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1569506052.14612.4.camel@librehacker.com> Subject: maxima x86_64/linux build failure From: Christopher Howard To: bug-guix@gnu.org Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:54:12 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-wQFXuibuhRnq5zvN6ZD4" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 95.128.36.40 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:30:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-wQFXuibuhRnq5zvN6ZD4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Running guix overlaid on Debian 9 amd64. Ran guix pull && guix package -u. Ran guix install wxmaxima. Build fails with / 'configure' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/m5/r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima- 5.42.2.drv.bz2'. Last lines of build log are checking for gcl... true checking for iconv... true checking for recode... false configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl". Backtrace: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A04 (prim= itive-load "/gnu/store/8n7mpp0l8rqv26gxr9hg9aj3ax4=E2=80=A6") In ice-9/eval.scm: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0191:35=C2=A0=C2=A03 (_ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0863:16=C2=A0=C2=A02 (every1 # =E2=80=A6) In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module- import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0799:28=C2=A0=C2=A01 (_ _) In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module- import/guix/build/utils.scm: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0616:6=C2=A0=C2=A00 (invoke _ . _) /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module- import/guix/build/utils.scm:616:6: In procedure invoke: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#)'. --=C2=A0 Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social feed: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker xmpp: creationist@member.fsf.org otr: E9685B53 01F038DD D29281C9 30FDA71E BD0095D4 gnupg: 23FD5CC5 (keys.gnupg.net) radio: KL1TL featured: https://worldenglishbible.org/ --=-wQFXuibuhRnq5zvN6ZD4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Running guix overlaid on Debia= n 9 amd64. Ran guix pull && guix package -u. Ran guix install wxmax= ima. Build fails with

/ 'configure' phasebuilder f= or `/gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv' failed w= ith exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0l= rmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drv= s/m5/r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv.bz2'.

Last lines of build log are

c= hecking for gcl... true
checking for iconv... true
chec= king for recode... false
configure: error: unable to run gcl exec= utable "gcl".
Backtrace:
     =       4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/8n7mpp0l8= rqv26gxr9hg9aj3ax4=E2=80=A6")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 =   191:35  3 (_ _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   863:16  2 (every1 #<procedure 782420 at /= gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvq=E2=80=A6> =E2=80=A6)
In /gnu/store/gfp= rsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm= :
   799:28  1 (_ _)
In /gnu/s= tore/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/utils.scm:
    616:6  0 (invoke _ . _)

/gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/= guix/build/utils.scm:616:6: In procedure invoke:
Throw to key `sr= fi-34' with args `(#<condition &invoke-error [program: "/gnu/store/q= 19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" arguments: ("= ./configure" "CONFIG_SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-ba= sh-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" "SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz2= 9qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" "--prefix=3D/gnu/store/3ihrqrdsq6r4n69n= vaznbvcqni38c968-maxima-5.42.2" "--enable-fast-install" "--build=3Dx86_64-u= nknown-linux-gnu" "--enable-gcl" "--with-posix-shell=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2= za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/sh" "--with-wish=3D/gnu/sto= re/2zl6wcliyd2ny8w73h77vk8bn4x91b7x-tk-8.6.8/bin/wish8.6") exit-status: 1 t= erm-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 8a0d40>)'.

-- 
Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social feed: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker xmpp: creationist@member.fsf.org otr: E9685B53 01F038DD D29281C9 30FDA71E BD0095D4 gnupg: 23FD5CC5 (keys.gnupg.net) radio: KL1TL featured: https://worldenglishbible.org/
--=-wQFXuibuhRnq5zvN6ZD4-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 26 18:03:43 2019 Received: (at 37520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 22:03:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45488 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDbrT-00068L-5A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:03:43 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:33691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDbrQ-000686-K2 for 37520@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:03:41 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3926240103 for <37520@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:03:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1569535414; bh=Oj2ztLAB3tSiXd5TZ3GZT7vrRjy80OmINhAYuSCUo2k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=qU+CLVumF4efOA3Pg5ZXCl99S/eHnzvIOraFj7BeKsHhuQwZ5HplvHM53syo4vlKh IrkTA5ChoIZNQPg8YVhaH+aigeYnZ/PopqbMTWUg9aB0SBzMJAQhIOu+PIovL7gIAm 0SqWXpO1Aib8/ba9rZeJBtD0TUeAGW05cr6n2CM1aSUET5tURWaealPK290KfQ6nIx piGjXiJdX9t7NY8cPwv7cbW7ywGiYs+jUIGAxuLKnYe9BPaUs0BPwV1S9zuC/TAKcd Z+sgqtJ97Tt+f1YnQQSXLBpQo32L06pjwxCG3kE8n2dfEGwXxySXY5SQv8uDcfZ74p n/fXS8MHYwrfA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 46fTTJ43Hhz9rxP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:03:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Diego Nicola Barbato To: Christopher Howard Subject: Re: bug#37520: maxima x86_64/linux build failure References: <1569506052.14612.4.camel@librehacker.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:03:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1569506052.14612.4.camel@librehacker.com> (Christopher Howard's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:54:12 -0800") Message-ID: <87pnjmhg0h.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37520 Cc: 37520@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hey Christopher, Christopher Howard writes: > Running guix overlaid on Debian 9 amd64. Ran guix pull && guix package -u= . Ran guix install wxmaxima. Build fails with > > / 'configure' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lr= mv-maxima-5.42.2.drv' failed with exit code 1 > build of /gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv fa= iled > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/m5/r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-m= axima-5.42.2.drv.bz2'. > > Last lines of build log are > > checking for gcl... true > checking for iconv... true > checking for recode... false > configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl". > Backtrace: > 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/8n7mpp0l8rqv26gxr9hg9aj3ax4=E2= =80=A6") > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 191:35 3 (_ _) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 863:16 2 (every1 # =E2=80=A6) > In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/g= nu-build-system.scm: > 799:28 1 (_ _) > In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/u= tils.scm: > 616:6 0 (invoke _ . _) > > /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/util= s.scm:616:6: In procedure invoke: > Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(# "SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/= bin/bash" "--prefix=3D/gnu/store/3ihrqrdsq6r4n69nvaznbvcqni38c968-maxima-5.= 42.2" "--enable-fast-install" "--build=3Dx86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--enabl= e-gcl" > "--with-posix-shell=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-mi= nimal-4.4.23/bin/sh" "--with-wish=3D/gnu/store/2zl6wcliyd2ny8w73h77vk8bn4x9= 1b7x-tk-8.6.8/bin/wish8.6") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f]= 8a0d40>)'. This looks like a duplicate of [0]. The build fails because gcl segfaults on invocation. That's where > configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl". comes from. This bug has recently been fixed (I'm currently on commit ee6bfff from last friday and maxima builds successfully). The problem in your case seems to be, that the guix you invoked when running `guix install wxmaxima' (and `guix package -u') is not the one you got by running `guix pull' (That's why guix tries to build maxima-5.42.2 even though it has recently been updated to 5.43.0). You might want to run: export PATH=3D"$HOME/.config/guix/current/bin:$PATH" (See section 4.6 Invoking `guix pull' in the Guix manual). Or if you've already done that, it might be necessary to run `hash guix' before running `guix package -u' and `guix install wxmaxima' again. If maxima still fails to build, could you please post the outputs of the following commands: which guix guix describe Thanks, Diego [0]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34484 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 28 22:34:19 2019 Received: (at 37520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2019 02:34:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEP2N-0007em-35 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:34:19 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.42]:53292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEP2L-0007eZ-7O for 37520@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:34:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FCA640; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 04:34:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= mime-version:content-type:content-type:references:in-reply-to :date:date:from:from:subject:subject:message-id:received :received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=1569724445; x=1571538846; bh=vrGgOlEjq0vVl7QO3XaPOTo7PqnIkvpQPDVOgufVDkI=; b=sGVZV0hiZqiL Nxquz5TfGvc89bjTxoTdffu8o8zobmfauFImkKDQok5Oatytg0F3BUSW1HI1S8hP jUO0sEjYbHTYuICR9uXKZNZbm4S0W+ey5MPe99jtON2Y9ablgmUdaxkydu+LvIxK LUZG8hA3+yqYHkQHMJ1XHz6PUfVNXRPPCa16munNyw4avWZ61lizriEAIWVgvhR3 brbrnFJLk3sBeZTLU+TIUInUs4vFhbou3TMA2e/9ayoAlK2+eOGp4p78+zdi3x4o XcL5iT1KVA1PgFd2tJ02ubeIHcPgK/42ufUYTWII3JZRcm0/ny4VS4V/1qpYpLLe a31KFIEzKiFmqcnfoeUzIjh+npstOjKCakbFLLUzEgnvqFh6/rTtAB5flfZnXzby ZTzCoU10N2+uYlD9yAZanrWGpuZ3AWtgjrZ9IFDVAO/LeVFBstm7lAdhBLyVgiBA vP+re1ubPXh1p73P3KOnt66fSldvr7B/wkCwhga1G2Lxb/uYUIcd6Db7IVwPz+rA keNX/hwKCEs0L38cN5WqGmnBSZEOweioLL2hMeF2JWiNWjDCJLQy1FSu0OvT9QPY XOPnWN/+IiHFFiJxPqafcUyu/1Im6sMMPpZnq4Gwt3Y+QpfCj78pihbZwBxXG3k9 j5EsVI8iHic7HFIZlVXI+x1Q4dSayOU= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mke315CkaUlN; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 04:34:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB3A4F7; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 04:34:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352843B12; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 04:34:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1569724441.27257.0.camel@librehacker.com> Subject: Re: bug#37520: maxima x86_64/linux build failure From: Christopher Howard To: Diego Nicola Barbato Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:34:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87pnjmhg0h.fsf@GlaDOS.home> References: <1569506052.14612.4.camel@librehacker.com> <87pnjmhg0h.fsf@GlaDOS.home> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-QhUD8zVDn6SN7ZnBTRb2" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37520 Cc: 37520@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-QhUD8zVDn6SN7ZnBTRb2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thank you. It is now building fine for me. On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 00:03 +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: > Hey Christopher, > > Christopher Howard writes: > > > Running guix overlaid on Debian 9 amd64. Ran guix pull && guix > > package -u. Ran guix install wxmaxima. Build fails with > > > > / 'configure' phasebuilder for > > `/gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv' > > failed with exit code 1 > > build of /gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima- > > 5.42.2.drv failed > > View build log at > > '/var/log/guix/drvs/m5/r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima- > > 5.42.2.drv.bz2'. > > > > Last lines of build log are > > > > checking for gcl... true > > checking for iconv... true > > checking for recode... false > > configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl". > > Backtrace: > >            4 (primitive-load > > "/gnu/store/8n7mpp0l8rqv26gxr9hg9aj3ax4…") > > In ice-9/eval.scm: > >    191:35  3 (_ _) > > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > >    863:16  2 (every1 # > /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvq…> …) > > In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module- > > import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: > >    799:28  1 (_ _) > > In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module- > > import/guix/build/utils.scm: > >     616:6  0 (invoke _ . _) > > > > /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module- > > import/guix/build/utils.scm:616:6: In procedure invoke: > > Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(# > [program: "/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash- > > minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" arguments: ("./configure" > > "CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash- > > minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" > > "SHELL=/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal- > > 4.4.23/bin/bash" " > > --prefix=/gnu/store/3ihrqrdsq6r4n69nvaznbvcqni38c968-maxima-5.42.2" > > "--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" " > > --enable-gcl" > > "--with-posix-shell=/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43- > > bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/sh" "--with- > > wish=/gnu/store/2zl6wcliyd2ny8w73h77vk8bn4x91b7x-tk- > > 8.6.8/bin/wish8.6") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] > > 8a0d40>)'. > > This looks like a duplicate of [0].  The build fails because > gcl segfaults on invocation.  That's where > > > configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl". > > comes from. > > This bug has recently been fixed (I'm currently on commit ee6bfff > from > last friday and maxima builds successfully). > > The problem in your case seems to be, that the guix you invoked when > running `guix install wxmaxima' (and `guix package -u') is not the > one > you got by running `guix pull' (That's why guix tries to build > maxima-5.42.2 even though it has recently been updated to > 5.43.0).  You > might want to run: > >     export PATH="$HOME/.config/guix/current/bin:$PATH" > > (See section 4.6 Invoking `guix pull' in the Guix manual).  Or if > you've > already done that, it might be necessary to run `hash guix' before > running `guix package -u' and `guix install wxmaxima' again. > > If maxima still fails to build, could you please post the outputs of > the > following commands: > >     which guix >     guix describe > > Thanks, > > Diego > > [0]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34484 --  Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social feed: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker xmpp: creationist@member.fsf.org otr: E9685B53 01F038DD D29281C9 30FDA71E BD0095D4 gnupg: 23FD5CC5 (keys.gnupg.net) radio: KL1TL featured: http://www.foi.org --=-QhUD8zVDn6SN7ZnBTRb2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Thank you. It is now building fine for me.

On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 00:03 +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
Hey Christopher,

Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com> writes:

Running guix overlaid on Debian 9 amd64. Ran guix pull && guix package -u. Ran guix install wxmaxima. Build fails with / 'configure' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/m5r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/m5/r9y68mhya0kv828mp62y28bfm0lrmv-maxima-5.42.2.drv.bz2'. Last lines of build log are checking for gcl... true checking for iconv... true checking for recode... false configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl". Backtrace: 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/8n7mpp0l8rqv26gxr9hg9aj3ax4…") In ice-9/eval.scm: 191:35 3 (_ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 863:16 2 (every1 #<procedure 782420 at /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvq…> …) In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: 799:28 1 (_ _) In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/utils.scm: 616:6 0 (invoke _ . _) /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/utils.scm:616:6: In procedure invoke: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &invoke-error [program: "/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" arguments: ("./configure" "CONFIG_SHELL=/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" "SHELL=/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash" "--prefix=/gnu/store/3ihrqrdsq6r4n69nvaznbvcqni38c968-maxima-5.42.2" "--enable-fast-install" "--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--enable-gcl" "--with-posix-shell=/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/sh" "--with-wish=/gnu/store/2zl6wcliyd2ny8w73h77vk8bn4x91b7x-tk-8.6.8/bin/wish8.6") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 8a0d40>)'.
This looks like a duplicate of [0]. The build fails because gcl segfaults on invocation. That's where
configure: error: unable to run gcl executable "gcl".
comes from. This bug has recently been fixed (I'm currently on commit ee6bfff from last friday and maxima builds successfully). The problem in your case seems to be, that the guix you invoked when running `guix install wxmaxima' (and `guix package -u') is not the one you got by running `guix pull' (That's why guix tries to build maxima-5.42.2 even though it has recently been updated to 5.43.0). You might want to run: export PATH="$HOME/.config/guix/current/bin:$PATH" (See section 4.6 Invoking `guix pull' in the Guix manual). Or if you've already done that, it might be necessary to run `hash guix' before running `guix package -u' and `guix install wxmaxima' again. If maxima still fails to build, could you please post the outputs of the following commands: which guix guix describe Thanks, Diego [0]: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34484
-- 
Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social feed: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker xmpp: creationist@member.fsf.org otr: E9685B53 01F038DD D29281C9 30FDA71E BD0095D4 gnupg: 23FD5CC5 (keys.gnupg.net) radio: KL1TL featured: http://www.foi.org
--=-QhUD8zVDn6SN7ZnBTRb2-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 29 12:42:41 2019 Received: (at 37520-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2019 16:42:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEcHQ-0001TH-RY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 12:42:41 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:53932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEcHP-0001Sx-0H for 37520-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 12:42:39 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3551E160060 for <37520-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:42:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1569775352; bh=6S4R6az7fwssotZnLsmc1Vwq/HFzGwXt7EZeRPR+uCY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=XiWPR4Y4Mu30fMTUWFF6y1iznT4GCIoyT4Sn9N3RBmpApbwpIWhjnzSQlnX1XRnax 3jrx2Hwws6ctsZp6vU4qlmUDRSWIJXdb8WDWOorCIUXPwmrlJLa7yodxapIbNoo2BD o50gk0zGOkOuhbU5VONR+S1gThRT+nlu4L3d/NdCLTSIRUAIV32/5bapYb8QFZ520F 0fTOiKu3Jd+lNQJyLtK1dml0RUYz4ZUNCfSzigPOCWBx5p0RvZKWwMCeqNpCnglaJL fxDDpG8nvDfTRi+lHMXRNwvYRYdcIxsyHZKWzrxVGZsgydD4aN/OBImMu4OPbwraL8 0vTnJgrwl77cQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 46hBCW1ylYz6tm9; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:42:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Diego Nicola Barbato To: Christopher Howard Subject: Re: bug#37520: maxima x86_64/linux build failure References: <1569506052.14612.4.camel@librehacker.com> <87pnjmhg0h.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <1569724441.27257.0.camel@librehacker.com> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:42:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1569724441.27257.0.camel@librehacker.com> (Christopher Howard's message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2019 18:34:01 -0800") Message-ID: <8736gfxde1.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37520-done Cc: 37520-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Christopher Howard writes: > Thank you. It is now building fine for me. I'm glad I could help. I'm closing this bug now. Regards, Diego From unknown Tue Aug 19 04:06:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator