Subject: Re: bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:31:38 +0300

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:53:23 +0200
> 
> 
> It's long annoyed med that `C-m' is described thusly by
> describe-bindings:
> 
> C-c RET		Prefix Command
> 
> C-c RET C-c	mml-secure-message-encrypt
> C-c RET C-e	mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt
> C-c RET C-n	mml-unsecure-message
> C-c RET C-p	Prefix Command
> C-c RET C-s	mml-secure-message-sign
> C-c RET C	Prefix Command
> C-c RET P	mml-preview
> C-c RET S	Prefix Command
> C-c RET b	mml-attach-buffer
> C-c RET c	Prefix Command
> 
> I know that `C-m' and RET is the same key binding, but I also think that
> when this key is used as a prefix key, I don't think anybody has ever
> wanted that to be RET instead of `C-m'.

It's a key you press, so I think it's a Good Thing that we use RET
here.