GNU bug report logs - #37451
[PATCH] Update libvterm to version 0.1.1

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 37451 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 37451 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: HiPhish <hiphish <at> posteo.de>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Update libvterm to version 0.1.1
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 21:40:57 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This patch bumps the version number of libvterm. The tarball for release 0.1 
has a bug which breaks the terminal emulator inside Neovim, so this new 
release fixes Neovim as well in the process.

[guix-libvterm.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 37451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: HiPhish <hiphish <at> posteo.de>
Cc: 37451 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#37451] [PATCH] Update libvterm to version 0.1.1
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 23:00:32 +0200

Hi HiPhish,

> This patch bumps the version number of libvterm. The tarball for release 0.1
> has a bug which breaks the terminal emulator inside Neovim, so this new
> release fixes Neovim as well in the process.

thank you for this diff!

I’d like to attribute this patch to you, but you’ve sent a diff (not the
output of “git format-patch -1” after a commit) which doesn’t contain
authorship information.  I would write a commit summary according to our
conventions, but I’d need to know with what name and email address you
would like to appear as the author.

--
Ricardo

Message #13 received at 37451-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: HiPhish <hiphish <at> posteo.de>
Cc: 37451-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#37451] [PATCH] Update libvterm to version 0.1.1
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 23:42:07 +0200

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:

> Hi HiPhish,
>
>> This patch bumps the version number of libvterm. The tarball for release 0.1
>> has a bug which breaks the terminal emulator inside Neovim, so this new
>> release fixes Neovim as well in the process.
>
> thank you for this diff!
>
> I’d like to attribute this patch to you, but you’ve sent a diff (not the
> output of “git format-patch -1” after a commit) which doesn’t contain
> authorship information.  I would write a commit summary according to our
> conventions, but I’d need to know with what name and email address you
> would like to appear as the author.

Thanks for sending me the output of “git format-patch” off-list.  It
wasn’t *quite* the format I expected, so I made a few minor changes to
the commit message and pushed it to the master branch (see commit
b48d77fcf6).

Oh, before that I re-enabled the tests, because they work now.  Yay!

Thanks again!

--
Ricardo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.