From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:09:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#37437 <37437@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#37437 <37437@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode Reply-To: bug#37437 <37437@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:09:07 +0000 retitle 37437 hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode reassign 37437 guix submitter 37437 Josh Holland severity 37437 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 17 06:34:04 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 10:34:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAo7-0007Ir-VB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:04 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54686) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAo4-0007IP-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:34:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAo1-0001Ar-AS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:33:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAo0-0004V0-0o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:33:57 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:35041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAnz-0004TG-7E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:33:55 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7866C5E0 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:33:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:33:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inv.alid.pw; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm1; bh=H7Ln8O/hDoO1qKVbjJztxxM7TpWkOwlgAiEL8T3oS2A=; b=xtSarimo dD7KIdMzgPFRJywWwQUWCwkBwuDSoOsTd+py7ENovvrv6bsZOPd6/MhnMmjZ+mNh smsEoAJOKx/yt18IyhlbSjmtebYhDWjFfbUPMNimXIunrirZmimEqfN7l70juxwP I1sNoVERZ1TNWqhk4tSYCxXCPFaAS0ojk036/C+htA/fl84SfAP83vWYn46YjDUb 3xg2XaEpWoplVC+raL8ZaPFepSml5ONN8c3sOsPViQCwB6A5oYU8CC7TzlgbRQMe lR5uMYJ2id4sGAZ6G1j/wffKv3rVdLLMGImVkJL224w3F5myWfdjm5k7MHisAC8h 5xQdXpBLBe7bDg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=H7Ln8O/hDoO1qKVbjJztxxM7TpWkO wlgAiEL8T3oS2A=; b=bUP85Mhn09Yz3UG/aa45PoNnIn+a5EvU9ZbCj4uy0rs0u fmKSf1vHC9IDErnHbbSshXOxkFB7a81UO+ZnywwSRU3eJbQGKguR/fSC41TKxpuB dom7o1ruQGKzc9KmkV2Wzi0s2oL7gFU4YIfN/EGS1WL9mNGMeXL0+CnLtr+psZNr xecz/B0e5BU8ybNNfKqOiwjII2x/tD0mNLUCFsAcOmAtaC2IngtdY3g6RVJtPCv+ K+43EJETrgZwgNOi2J0uP9MfTLd2NJbTCSuAzSLsaG/RmEIxAk+8Kb2OeHtWUuZK WyGRCNqYXQV3qI/fTXcED5VwPfbKJ/Hl1JAC26Wew== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudeigddtgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecufghrlhcuvffnffculdduhedmnecujfgurhepfgfhvf fufffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhshhcujfholhhlrghnugcuoehj ohhshhesihhnvhdrrghlihgurdhpfieqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmvghlphgrrdhorhhgpd hgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeelvddrvdegrddvhedrudekvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomhepjhhoshhhsehinhhvrdgrlhhiugdrphifnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from spica (host-92-24-25-182.ppp.as43234.net [92.24.25.182]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 408B5D6005D for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:33:50 -0400 (EDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Josh Holland To: bug-guix Subject: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:33:48 +0100 Message-ID: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 64.147.123.25 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi, I just did the following: $ guix install emacs-elixir-mode substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/gzip/7n24v62aw8sjlrs06gbz4zvj11zvryry-emacs-epl-0.8... emacs-epl-0.8 24KiB 2.6MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/gzip/152p023jxd5cf5lr87wighihp92pkal6-emacs-pkg-info-0.6... emacs-pkg-info-0.6 17KiB 3.1MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% building /gnu/store/b91172xfzkscfd9627d0ysrdjgpbxs6z-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar.drv... downloading from https://stable.melpa.org/packages/elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar... \sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/bb5m97pbmzvwlvn8wmrdfgpvnl0k8r1m-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar: expected hash: 091cizxg1aw8bkj58y048mj020ssapjflav633z9bl6gmi10dy4v actual hash: 13d5r64rqskdapnrbbxv0h91gn77c6af5kjjrg5mpphvl887s04c hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/bb5m97pbmzvwlvn8wmrdfgpvnl0k8r1m-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar' build of /gnu/store/b91172xfzkscfd9627d0ysrdjgpbxs6z-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/b9/1172xfzkscfd9627d0ysrdjgpbxs6z-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar.drv.bz2'. cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/xqdxvb7xy4ydpwkqgp3jd985qb4vw8k2-emacs-elixir-mode-2.3.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix install: error: build of `/gnu/store/xqdxvb7xy4ydpwkqgp3jd985qb4vw8k2-emacs-elixir-mode-2.3.1.drv' failed Is something nefarious going on, or have upstream just changed their tarballs? Thanks, -- Josh Holland From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 17 07:59:53 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 11:59:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC97-00031V-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:59:53 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC95-00031N-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:59:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC93-00059X-47 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:59:46 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC90-0002BO-J8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:59:44 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:59912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAC90-000290-9K for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:59:42 -0400 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a0d95c3a; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:59:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=2q+OmnVu9YBmbZQcb9NjWv CWW/YF/tEzyPaTvj+IxsE=; b=IUODmK7AKe8UQGo0jvXNf6oxMb7SPampy4f6G8 6s5sLUnKgNiZ0NRvQIVhbGdzMVw4VX9cfI6KnyI2flN0U5ixFj4hEcI/7019lxI8 pZ3hnsYH8ZinFEZGgh7puBhLEtn8VRTx37NE3IBHEI8uluFj5KdCj4yOwJs2rOEq 5DfCCzz7K0l2ox/u2E6R9tdIzaObyKCTGF7UM3oOcz+u+GA7seoMgvX7kB+XBg2t Qlnc6TZ+DZjPXw2gUEUERY4pNxEAVc12Rvo7kAJLVkQqw4ZkqVp7WPB47mCq0Oht fwTdQX/eF2aSvSEsiTDpyiCuPRcOYEZ2WMB70BWtSzNe3tkQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f2114bcb (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:59:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#37437: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode References: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> In-reply-to: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:59:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2001:470:7405::1 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 37437@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Josh, Thanks for the report! Josh Holland =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > \sha256 hash mismatch for=20 > /gnu/store/bb5m97pbmzvwlvn8wmrdfgpvnl0k8r1m-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar: > expected hash:=20 > 091cizxg1aw8bkj58y048mj020ssapjflav633z9bl6gmi10dy4v > actual hash:=20 > 13d5r64rqskdapnrbbxv0h91gn77c6af5kjjrg5mpphvl887s04c It's already changed again: downloading from=20 https://stable.melpa.org/packages/elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar... elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar 60KiB=20 359KiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for=20 /gnu/store/bb5m97pbmzvwlvn8wmrdfgpvnl0k8r1m-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar: expected hash:=20 091cizxg1aw8bkj58y048mj020ssapjflav633z9bl6gmi10dy4v actual hash:=20 1c4xp9dqnbndrn82qhvv2ix9fvh7abcbmbajiknjfrz2mf9pwxid I can check my substitute server tomorrow for the =E2=80=98original=E2=80= =99=20 (091cizxg1aw8bkj58y048mj020ssapjflav633z9bl6gmi10dy4v) tarball if=20 nobody else has a copy. Guix servers don't seem to. > Is something nefarious going on, or have upstream just changed=20 > their > tarballs? If someone is trying something sneaky, they're making an=20 incompetent amount of noise about it. Looks like upstream's just gone a bit timestamp-crazy, judging=20 from the small handful of (very recently) mirrored tarballs I=20 could find: /gnu/store/26akldw7c2y6fparfixycdb0lhds8ddj-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar hash: 0jaxy4r7qyl63n9plinz8wc42ywr6sqy4d0p8ma7a1v0svi5cyfx https://elpa.emacs-china.org/melpa-stable/elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar https://mirrors.nju.edu.cn/elpa/melpa-stable/elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar /gnu/store/6dh3amvmd4b6rxx995w4zmc582flbfhj-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar hash: 05wdspd43b413x4x2wx1wa8xbasp9rprq3wy5hrai1w72bnpfamc http://mirrors.zju.edu.cn/elpa/melpa-stable/elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar /gnu/store/443bcaq7g5787l0qx76myx7pv2mm8apc-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar hash: 1c4xp9dqnbndrn82qhvv2ix9fvh7abcbmbajiknjfrz2mf9pwxid https://stable.melpa.org/packages/elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar [the current canonical upstream tarball, I guess, mentioned=20 above] which differ[0] only in metadata: $ diffoscope all_the_things =2D--=20 /gnu/store/26akldw7c2y6fparfixycdb0lhds8ddj-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar ###=20 /gnu/store/6dh3amvmd4b6rxx995w4zmc582flbfhj-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar +++=20 /gnu/store/443bcaq7g5787l0qx76myx7pv2mm8apc-elixir-mode-2.3.1.tar =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 file list =E2=94=82 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ =E2=94=82 -drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0) 0=20 2019-09-17 06:17:34.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/ =E2=94=82 --rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 20892=20 2019-09-17 06:17:34.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-mode.el =E2=94=82 --rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 30321=20 2019-09-17 06:17:34.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-smie.el =E2=94=82 --rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 257=20 2019-09-17 06:17:34.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-mode-pkg.el =E2=94=82 #drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0) 0=20 2019-09-17 03:49:10.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/ =E2=94=82 #-rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 20892=20 2019-09-17 03:49:10.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-mode.el =E2=94=82 #-rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 30321=20 2019-09-17 03:49:10.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-smie.el =E2=94=82 #-rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 257=20 2019-09-17 03:49:10.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-mode-pkg.el =E2=94=82 +drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0) 0=20 2019-09-17 11:18:38.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/ =E2=94=82 +-rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 20892=20 2019-09-17 11:18:38.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-mode.el =E2=94=82 +-rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 30321=20 2019-09-17 11:18:38.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-smie.el =E2=94=82 +-rw-r--r-- 0 root (0) root (0) 257=20 2019-09-17 11:18:38.000000 elixir-mode-2.3.1/elixir-mode-pkg.el [no other differences] Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2AyqYACgkQ2Imw8BjF STwUzQ/+Imj5trORWMiWR9flKPTPn/3GETMPlx79s+AwyEDuCpD/SPxiI1TzYDII gRmunSuYM2bUiHaekAXhGnXVh1tG3OGOrHoBdxlUy2n9vN1P6Bi9b3dEk2BHqmN/ eOtCim/5M2aAP5skTIUePqm0zNMk8Mv293cPtmfK7UAZLz2hYwxjw7Ggw7BswZSf oZL9rEedVnRbEQN7eL+yeSifvkce2i+3f6VL7Grz1+YQb6U5wcFgXLDizQ2KxA1a 6nzNfT4kujDWPD0MOSGICwtJUCu38trMlZMsK+7jCLYWP8ImK928cWT+PDrEiBwD BGlbks0xxuz3cqRfmm0o+v0Sc8B5e0JnvemA4HB5WoomqxChb9rFG6ehqQ/fr9KZ VaH7zuOaMQBSYepakCc8IPukeb/q1Yr5QcKdnI/MkaenbYl4GHTqCs7Lg4URuXIh 6pM/na2qUaXX9VRUISGuhNAgMroiyGqe/DUCYzLKxNI3Kyy0XZZH1f8GxDi8zDln ROZNt1vr6N7ymMvIle0ojypEFehLCxbWAbX3FyNrz/iWDd2jRpySDIjoFuOzXzH4 zRzBf8wWnpiSMbiC0hwamdwnQrXUV9yecEmvxamnhF+jdyGyADVY7i436c1gwTU2 fftcmimjM00cg4t2rlMyu/dGstr29xnPxDWLSi39mpL0Lw1f5dQ= =VPSG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 17 16:49:41 2019 Received: (at 37437) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 20:49:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53375 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAKPt-0007Hw-1f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:49:41 -0400 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:59042 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAKPr-0007Hm-5g for 37437@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:49:39 -0400 Received: from alma-ubu (pD951F9D0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.249.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AA853FA1F; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:49:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:49:36 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= Subject: Re: bug#37437: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode Message-ID: <20190917224936.04119c20@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> References: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/9wYHd/EIZRjQLdEbFEfUt6v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Josh and Tobias, thanks for reporting and checking. I'm very surprised someone is already using this :-) I only added this package three days ago, that's probably the reason why the source code is not available via ha [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily 0.4 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37437 Cc: 37437@debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Josh Holland X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --Sig_/9wYHd/EIZRjQLdEbFEfUt6v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Josh and Tobias, thanks for reporting and checking. I'm very surprised someone is already using this :-) I only added this package three days ago, that's probably the reason why the source code is not available via hash on ci.guix.gnu.org or any other CAN. There it failed to build due to a dependency, though it doesn't tell which dependency if failing: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1713420/details Is that maybe the source dependency? I thought that Ricardo added a feature to Cuirass to see the failing dependency? Anyway, I checked the downloaded source code from the "original" 091cizx hash and it is exactly the same as what I found in Github (under the version tag). I changed the package definition, the sources are now taken from the git repository. After compilation, the result is exactly the same. Commited as 3a8d68badaca85122d91d8b7045daee87acb0aea This was my first Emacs package and I used the importer, which went through very smooth. Have I done anything wrong? I noticed that only 7 packages in emacs-xyz.scm are from stable.melpa.org, where 2 of them have a 404. Is this repository not as stable as the name suggests?=20 Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/9wYHd/EIZRjQLdEbFEfUt6v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXYFG4AAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /SdJAJwLWedebBePr1cBamciNkVRh700eQCdFoSlFY35fzBcBgxaqBzDqQsj/Jg= =wj0J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/9wYHd/EIZRjQLdEbFEfUt6v-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 19 05:39:22 2019 Received: (at 37437-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2019 09:39:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAsuI-0006qI-6K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:39:22 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:43130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAsuB-0006q2-3m for 37437-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:39:21 -0400 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 84c43f9c; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:39:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=dMN9SdrcwQM+J7k1eKyqrq 1EKxnSHqRCRSU96iK2J9w=; b=jnkDUcN437qPGygm1SR3QxpjYA6G6tpgHZ1Rmr R2p/OhxhD/psfc2XXNhdJWlEH3yTYeMBUCXISuQNfZmbEKCiBHHX170ySWBIFDNn Jbi89vFZbWroMKr71KfTN+Ivgq/aibRRU8P129lgVSVGW07QIt8em+A1PrEoLDcS B5PjLWcj0grAlib1rRyreENeJ0QRYJD8JqqVzHufDy+trmHwxLDr/rcoMwD9nXhR O1NB4OtphX+noi6/uHtpfz8N3kX2Py1woceXcmxDc5TvDz6KTB5r7UmhVzTKGNv7 gmEQBMFqtRdaodfCnElK/SvSeoHyHWBCvvTmgG/0uAQLamSA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9fe1d42f (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:39:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: 37437-done@debbugs.gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: Re: bug#37437: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode References: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> In-reply-to: <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:39:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhj039s8.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37437-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I can check my substitute server tomorrow for the =E2=80=98original=E2=80= =99 > (091cizxg1aw8bkj58y048mj020ssapjflav633z9bl6gmi10dy4v) tarball=20 > if > nobody else has a copy. Guix servers don't seem to. I didn't have the chance while in LAN range, and the point's now=20 moot anyway. Thanks, Bj=C3=B6rn! Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Is [MELPA] not as stable as the name suggests. Indeed[0], quite unfortunate. Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://guix-devel.gnu.narkive.com/6iiqs1hT/patch-emacs-danneskjold-theme#p= ost3 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2DTLcACgkQ2Imw8BjF STz+zQ/+NWLUtDrf2Kqmn39F1Znc9wTEgGFfDEDJAoCztGfng0aos07knb4aZm5G qUU04MxX5VxTNGMlNSC3Zn8U7dk3ebotMXWPf9Hr5BFM58ptolqCrWdV7cVhtafJ VfWmn3EhsvSVu1fFhgYS+E1zrhaKkeAxliqzWPfedjKhUawgXYA51NbYDAVKRVQj 7QzhqRb5Ws/ETtwn/ay5WVlVmCjxfBDGq5aZg1lI5UV/cTSnNj3mHh6khJSXOlwi yIqey/R08CLTdyECcUM9jLIJnjYezUq2CbSWRTOLM9BX4cmC6i2DkhPQnLBQalTA xh2cnFnoh3BH1gfMz6RUJiXagjJKyK7nRGbmNtM+v2w7eCZaBBVZ2WDxdLF1+5OH D0zjsq/ZVK+D3IhgBNe6e6LLYj1mH/4TExDW5grnei43KvrQc64UQcocQh3vapEK ZyUz4ZLGGZnsZ/orTMJVKvAP2M0DS2dkyxvyX2k3FCqN1MUH0yjlqvJuzmaKGXqO wkLjBqa6W/yxPbK0U118ZeqplAwvjunxvEz1d0nN+UX72ExM5I2wPJhW+EDnRM7X ToPWKR/UUBzcgNPjIEj8hHJZcheSJs+MBxKa1IIlhU83kWrAUqw3vWa38C8q1eYb +l1W4pC6FpRaTg4DFY2kBlOtGBTlBxMcsZv4OFek186xsOEG9p8= =5c9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 23 09:48:47 2019 Received: (at 37437) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 13:48:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCOhr-00059s-NW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:48:47 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:45436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCOhp-00059V-4c for 37437@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:48:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.120.128.191]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F033402DE; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:48:36 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner To: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= Subject: Re: bug#37437: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode Message-ID: <20190923134836.GA11513@E5400> References: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> <20190917224936.04119c20@alma-ubu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190917224936.04119c20@alma-ubu> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37437 Cc: 37437@debbugs.gnu.org, Josh Holland X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > Hi Josh and Tobias, >=20 > thanks for reporting and checking. I'm very surprised someone is > already using this :-) I only added this package three days ago, that's > probably the reason why the source code is not available via hash on > ci.guix.gnu.org or any other CAN. There it failed to build due to a > dependency, though it doesn't tell which dependency if failing: >=20 > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1713420/details >=20 It's not clear, but one of the dependencies of the package is the source. So if it already changed between pushing the commit and the build farm building the package then it may have failed for that reason. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl2IzTEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HlvBAAi0cKRkSYAsFCJiJMtjwNVtGnTIz/UmZbs7Mp0n/0BO8D23x5EexzqpBu GdvriUp+qTJi12Zz7OORv4Y35/SgwdV56/2hu1IuTm9DGaL1Nh9zz4FQNlBwxHii a6TN8tuLgsAKtJ0nrvzh17JPkXrvb6UdrZxWIacDlBKYST6gsz8BosQgHOXkN+Mj fbhN8izlWWIW9qqfps9nUP6rJmvn8ln83Uc+b3jKuJe2TK/R8CwaLPP/tyb63ocq +yJ6Q0Gx8jaFeN4EKrxyvZBhwfdSQslVhSH6vA1XrecqZXEURI7Ek3vrQTOT5HsX OBTOSSdxlknTZ/bXtg22yA4HXf2Pxg39jp0rdTt8fJI+PduIAGrKz451eUGP9pDw qA2IIpkDkcRxO8ZbZygBpMwq9+515ddAqXsvW3g+xX1yfm2CQwCKGXyzHQpyhqYI Lu0mWVFAJSsnvgSLkVefL94771TPjmYsSeOmCo+anz4eEVGle7clCR2hVFTEFt1y Ek6i1gA7xWCWR3L0+ieJu36ohxjAmdHeufQ2/Wy1tHOI2S2Xo4GgOUksEbgqQQOE ptgRcdiEz19g2rJ9Tgdhb9eX1x6U3lcgo8iwKLS7kzAQMWsk/KZd9m7UEDfyXmZF xnxk524bnO/TrsQbOqODnR6eg9kg43ZHvxWU7/V7nfq+xWw0kEk= =5sIv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:09:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator