GNU bug report logs - #37415
Asserting failure setting frame parameters to non-fixnum values in early-init.el

Previous Next

Full log

Message #53 received at 37415 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: lekktu <at> gmail.com, 37415 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37415: Asserting failure setting frame parameters to
 non-fixnum values in early-init.el
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:08:04 +0200

> Thanks, but I probably should have explain the nature of my confusion
> better (and would have done that, should I know you will act upon it
> so seriously).  Sorry about that.

I hope you now better understand why I didn't respond to Juanma's
report immediately.  There are too many layers at work here.

> Here's what confused me in this problem:
>
>    . the FIXNUMP assertion is probably there for a reason; what is that
>      reason?

Which assertion?  The one in XFIXNUM?

>    . how come we don't hit this assertion when the same expression is
>      in the init file, only in the early-init file?

I do hit it here.  Unless some sort of bug happens before.  For
example, when using (left . foo).

>    . why doesn't the X build hit the same assertion in the same
>      scenario?

The X build sets 'left' only in 'gui_figure_window_size' whereafter it
immediately sanitizes it into f->left_pos which is later on used by
XCreateWindow.

martin

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.