GNU bug report logs - #37350
[PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 04:49:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37350: closed ([PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.)
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:26:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:25:09 +0200
with message-id <87r24lnr62.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#37350] [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #37350,
regarding [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
37350: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37350
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:48:09 +0200
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
See attached.
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[0001-gnu-emacs-interactive-align-Update-to-0.4.2-1.e1308c.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 37350-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#37350] [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:25:09 +0200
Hello,

Brian Leung <bkleung89 <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> I've attached an alternate update, which updates from the current Guix's
> 0.1.0 to 0.4.2 instead of from 0.1.0 to 0.4.2-some-commit.

Applied!

> I feel like the update to the nonversioned tree is slightly preferable
> since of the seven commits where the nonversioned tree is ahead, five are
> bugfixes and/or small refactors, one is a Readme change, and only one is a
> feature addition. But I don't feel too strongly either way.

Yeah, but then I’d argue that upstream should cut a new release.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


This bug report was last modified 5 years and 312 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.