From unknown Sat Sep 06 01:12:04 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#37324 <37324@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#37324 <37324@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) Reply-To: bug#37324 <37324@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 08:12:04 +0000 retitle 37324 Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) reassign 37324 emacs submitter 37324 Sebastian Urban severity 37324 minor tag 37324 wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 06 13:24:41 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2019 17:24:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6HyT-0006pH-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:24:41 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46416) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6HyQ-0006p8-Py for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:24:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6HyP-0001nv-Ph for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:24:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, SPOOFED_FREEMAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6HyO-0006ge-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:24:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:36485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6HyO-0006g8-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:24:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id y19so7406666wrd.3 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ttvbloSfJ24MqCoR/Ef6DZ+qvOBv3hP6A+IkafDYgL4=; b=sFFZd2C9Zo2xYAXRT8kjQA3Z1dEoqqup9Ps8rzVLU1cZTUL1exwLMhmLi8imyWyvEE iS+D59GHNHvNnjMksDJzmDSHcUYxh/6tPYi5fNxlVCSTzOcq2hy3DAZ2Po2oj8XQaLJ6 K+EuVaf0OM+61xIt3Z9kiZdYil0RQSWb2G+AUSAY2jWyr6C7rNPlNZM9dUakhyhbq4hN 8QW+mBJmvcBLKZywCrqsYLrYOovhK/hPblJLUvpZxsd6zmKapMfPFlyl2YEBjJHapVVd mhhgTbZayDnIQ8Z0KSQ019Qkv83K/++KFEm9t0ZaqjjOR/243siFjYItX49NDOxKNJ9y A3FQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ttvbloSfJ24MqCoR/Ef6DZ+qvOBv3hP6A+IkafDYgL4=; b=gLEsm7EbXGzkptE3Op4n89xvVlaOJXIkZq+jq6m6j2jNFiw4hOdZuq/8pJOhqt+OJZ 2K5R+m672N9NQj0xryDeXJOA7K0/K4ZzuFn8Unwt3j1ZRB8CmqpAaCbB/EQ7IUTFrHhB 6bgwo8TjnGi5zg//R6L5SIq0+gVRkZluN77XbJ+EUA8gntzmFppMm8zDYFAliEs9JdIF XFXcgbdbN4hdRuSrlh0avZOc4t2THD2AwcKUi8R43mMMa3FiX523/I+4t2htrMYqWJSo DBCdDRIvJYS+VDvP/UivEvUqG3/zE66qAh13YiVlp6KBrlFPr9NQ6NQkmhfMZwCAVdkO eqyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUFOT1jKAT65zWibqzEH5SSEW3ghHHrSPlnccmpWlYfa59+7OXh TyvOQt4Y/QZhHa33/Atu+bAbzBli X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxK3oNuUXJTKkaIGUX+KDHh8YXLKis9rplHzZ9TdCRmskk+RcwyEiH/nIwTYL3zk+aebRQKIg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6648:: with SMTP id f8mr7762360wrw.167.1567790674651; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:f41:1c74:5201:35a8:ac6e:7139:5105? ([2a00:f41:1c74:5201:35a8:ac6e:7139:5105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w125sm11047495wmg.32.2019.09.06.10.24.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:24:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Sebastian Urban Subject: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) To: Bug GNU Emacs Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:24:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::431 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) Line 932 in 'FRAMES.TEXI'. I think there is one unnecessary "space". S. U. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 06 14:14:31 2019 Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2019 18:14:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6Ikh-0008Dz-5r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:14:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6Ikf-0008Dk-LK for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:14:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6Ika-0006Gs-Im; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:14:24 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3881 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i6IkZ-0003ok-SA; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:14:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:14:24 +0300 Message-Id: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Sebastian Urban In-reply-to: (message from Sebastian Urban on Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:24:30 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37324 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Sebastian Urban > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:24:30 +0200 > > In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters > - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) > + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) > > Line 932 in 'FRAMES.TEXI'. > > I think there is one unnecessary "space". That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the next. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 07 17:14:41 2019 Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2019 21:14:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2b-0001Kh-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:14:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:32810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6i2Z-0001KR-Dd for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 17:14:39 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id r17so9910954wme.0 for <37324@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:14:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4gnsfEytBBwMEhLhH81M55/ZuJmCiWB/2lrAt9UO1ZA=; b=muf7+mR0atICQZbPrkvKjU+zVb9mjJEWogaNhDvwcRx0VsNzOaGFVz2zHSRPCEMrgd H9nvI0ldMFwHYTA99JcgATJrBwiTugv4Qbx8TaEfQGLRSmfZvefQfb2bmP4nPq3/Xr1r zKSwvoRJEHZeHwsziqHq8gGq3oaoyk6TlmvVHZqNl3QTPdkw2D7UBphO/eHLURoaYKsa LsC1Okb/lbeXMGqIcmFY0xqCjcpuW0677W581Wfg4szDFpjZnGhSTz/Ymm0zH/F2xPYE fMpz/08F/HSJ3RorPDY7COl0xVNwfKQqtjja3LAddNpPl0Ipn9zmcsHMbd2CdCzN/GF4 pnrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4gnsfEytBBwMEhLhH81M55/ZuJmCiWB/2lrAt9UO1ZA=; b=JKC8yMPw2qEpHNdG2SYFpo6L2LyZSEx6N138+69iqQ83eDUIzDDVT97ocqDYwAXDlS 9VfS9/0SDzv5KuMkUe6oNOq0o4OmasQRtgWF+HjHZ4JP1QARqIC6EMw4nJjcBlnH8Gbx 4wFeEUnTUhkK++e4xK0ffmZ90bsVdOzfnvoIJCEusZj7iq7d9Yn57dGj2P+MghPLS1ET ItV+JsWfprxuhnjCBX3Yp7Whd9MoTm39Vj96cHU6YkokCxAuCtux9IzYww9bM7Kg7G95 JqMDiHjyd8a63jPq6UHUgPpFgirAltW1bXE7nmoOFwM8oEcIWUb4UaBupbyW4wFLV7ZT 3E0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUy7i9VzDbOvWg9WSSSwh23TSAM74UQWRBptJ570S3REHBlv1fG 7q/YysNL2oXq0Io4Wholt/0NYtXgCYyQvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQ0N36x6aoBsMGUZASKvBd/pNjIGtJGgmEaoqy7ZA6A58CpjxnaK1763PGqkvly0aPEXZSSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd05:: with SMTP id f5mr12213369wmj.12.1567890873446; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:f41:1cae:b041:90df:5475:6184:6e6? ([2a00:f41:1cae:b041:90df:5475:6184:6e6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y72sm17859055wmc.26.2019.09.07.14.14.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:14:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Sebastian Urban Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) To: Eli Zaretskii References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37324 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >> In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters >> - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) >> + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90)) >> (...) >> I think there is one unnecessary "space". > > That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the > next. Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example - before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code (well, perhaps 1 is needed). But... is changing the insides of the code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable? If everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone may think that there is an error in the code example. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 07 22:35:15 2019 Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2019 02:35:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2p-0001f8-0x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2n-0001eq-UJ for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2i-0003u7-Es; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:08 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3378 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i6n2h-0005wv-Ll; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:35:08 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 05:35:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83pnkb4ish.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Sebastian Urban In-reply-to: <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> (message from Sebastian Urban on Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37324 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Sebastian Urban > Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200 > > >> I think there is one unnecessary "space". > > > > That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the > > next. > > Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example - > before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code > (well, perhaps 1 is needed). But... is changing the insides of the > code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable? If > everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE > perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone > may think that there is an error in the code example. I don't see anything unreasonable in that example. Whitespace is insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 08 09:00:14 2019 Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2019 13:00:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6wne-0006FY-Ml for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 09:00:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:42082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6wnd-0006FI-2I for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 09:00:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id q14so10934589wrm.9 for <37324@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 06:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fa9N0Za97K+Yg5s5pvJ5/WHW9lWXHy17VFB/pvHbRwc=; b=GWxs0q9dMt+MMD9HWlzlCfQLH92c+GwA6DZrYnm24sE/7rwfFTp0C8HUNsbHaUYtFq 8MlWMaWHHPk6TqBJdQUk736ASQYw3vyiRJBXaa2cW90+JRFp4BWhjoUG33N7GA9Y9NE6 led/k54jveHwt9OTN2nNyiGQQShwS8sHz6TIWiC/uvqz4xbdL6Is5zj6dEkPIOt6lAf4 M9w/daW8BNbvyhNZmDlBd0osLkXWCnYEpQXlvjLryZ4jncZT/OyPNw31ss2nhyj/7hSw K/PS5OXRigwqY/WaTD2iXF2AiaFzuacXYKU/ccKsAhUyDzPG64zwGDeMrWosFPZ71+Rh P1FQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fa9N0Za97K+Yg5s5pvJ5/WHW9lWXHy17VFB/pvHbRwc=; b=HdHP55yTu9bpUW+bA3bil4tKgXhxXRrS6jqMDDp8pL0OUfvCSJe8AX1HjzwX5nuFoR 4B4pl27mMmY/b1kQYF8gl4wkXw9CunkkJ4cGirDEXdSYMoilOgBKqI7DzaoJRiKidN4S Fl7ZrkQFa58EEu/pKvb1dRTHocG7LF/Q8lnwQVcPWjIdwlotDeAIA5YZNjiTjz4H2PAm LQQI1B2TxSWxqQ4DfrmBmYvSxNg5X50/Gi0pucxLarDDdMGqLHCvycHff+ZEZbTzzSdW Sk36TuzSIo8dRnJU5jziehgnGY9LSTRKniGoQ1w0k7Qas9j5RDTT6VLz+rrbGYh8DAU4 xx8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXYpQ4YTfWLDjFtR3UND9zPkM0NBwafpM+cmfUGnTopCrUqQDhA 1noVgonwJbh0Ay7sBlwGS7lxjHSm X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzE8ofhk0Lc7MYLpZjjm53FMkAG5euoGQ7gborQf2Zf2EAUYaKVL5+OwuT0HtTa3S0UA7DIww== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a4c8:: with SMTP id h8mr14923747wrb.293.1567947606891; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 06:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:f41:18dd:6220:de5:16c4:883a:484b? ([2a00:f41:18dd:6220:de5:16c4:883a:484b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a7sm13375716wra.43.2019.09.08.06.00.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Sep 2019 06:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) To: Eli Zaretskii References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> <83pnkb4ish.fsf@gnu.org> From: Sebastian Urban Message-ID: <9889a5d6-df74-4dc4-4be5-a5dee3eeee96@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:00:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83pnkb4ish.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37324 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > I don't see anything unreasonable in that example. Whitespace is > insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp). Alignment is unreasonable. I just think this example should look like other examples of this kind - one space, before and after dot - even if from perspective of code it is correct to put more than one space. If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix" or "not a bug" or something. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 08 13:11:00 2019 Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2019 17:11:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i70iK-00045v-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:11:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i70iJ-00045j-0R for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:10:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i70iD-0000vD-Ts; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:10:53 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4835 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i70iD-0005Gp-1o; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:10:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:10:57 +0300 Message-Id: <83lfuy4sta.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Sebastian Urban In-reply-to: <9889a5d6-df74-4dc4-4be5-a5dee3eeee96@gmail.com> (message from Sebastian Urban on Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:00:01 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> <83pnkb4ish.fsf@gnu.org> <9889a5d6-df74-4dc4-4be5-a5dee3eeee96@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37324 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Sebastian Urban > Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:00:01 +0200 > > If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add > anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix" > or "not a bug" or something. I cannot know if you are the only one. IME, some people object vociferously when their bug reports are closed as "wontfix", so I stopped doing that except when the report is obviously wrong. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 17 06:17:35 2019 Received: (at 37324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 10:17:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51649 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAYB-0004mc-Jk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:17:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]:46722) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAAY9-0004mI-H7 for 37324@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:17:33 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id q24so1294679plr.13 for <37324@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 03:17:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5d78NfevrNyEF/GmDQEzi0LTF3Go2dmKVciG2YvCSzA=; b=lnF0RAR93Oe+btumU1ieUkjcsOEy3V2sMKR0UKLzcg1mIfZ66HhbteyS+9N8KiIigK yRuaW++nvCH3lqCu1PLOSSr7huc9Xxr+mscc2tWQ77eAJTQ4r8dXOYkekihCEDX7XMdg nQhpch28ycfpPKhE8mrySQN3sx9+YGY49v4taEHdY8V8X8p1Kduw4Szz9zbHqLY5bnhm Bd+Lb3raJHMD+XTAd+HBqOJtinu61wbzbxvFNVPpyOmVmMlkar9Cvmm1ZpJrXAiF/wej SR2MsGGcMFWlGBBMR1sUFmf2gfiqssSrfQoeQfNo6PtDqTJ1wk56xPJ0h8JQYBUvOHz6 Q5ew== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVgO/NKlwNQeDd+34c1hUIkwTM84meXI9JnOiU6ECVE9UUcRMdG xJiGfveS83IixdksvuoYE33C+yvpmF4FrVbUbkg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyLYiNSFoOoK3kMuee3y2TuBfRKh2vjem/uVBvDPHyYQzyIVa6fzP/1RfKrBwmV3SF7kA37fNzZMEw7Q/kxads= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd97:: with SMTP id q23mr2922020pls.259.1568715447686; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 03:17:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83woel5m2n.fsf@gnu.org> <0e607c48-e932-593d-b603-56a102fd4926@gmail.com> <83pnkb4ish.fsf@gnu.org> <9889a5d6-df74-4dc4-4be5-a5dee3eeee96@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9889a5d6-df74-4dc4-4be5-a5dee3eeee96@gmail.com> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:17:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters) To: Sebastian Urban Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 37324 Cc: 37324@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) tags 37324 + wontfix close 37324 quit Sebastian Urban writes: > If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add > anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix" > or "not a bug" or something. No further comments in 8 days, so I'm closing this now. Thanks for the report -- I think it's highly useful when people point out things that they think could be improved. Unfortunately sometimes people will disagree about what is best, especially when it comes to stylistic choices which will inevitably be a a bit subjective. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Sat Sep 06 01:12:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator