GNU bug report logs -
#37324
Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 37324 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 37324 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:25:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:25:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters
- (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
+ (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
Line 932 in 'FRAMES.TEXI'.
I think there is one unnecessary "space".
S. U.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:24:30 +0200
>
> In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters
> - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
> + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
>
> Line 932 in 'FRAMES.TEXI'.
>
> I think there is one unnecessary "space".
That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the next.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 07 Sep 2019 21:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters
>> - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
>> + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
>> (...)
>> I think there is one unnecessary "space".
>
> That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the
> next.
Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example -
before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code
(well, perhaps 1 is needed). But... is changing the insides of the
code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable? If
everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE
perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone
may think that there is an error in the code example.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 08 Sep 2019 02:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200
>
> >> I think there is one unnecessary "space".
> >
> > That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the
> > next.
>
> Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example -
> before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code
> (well, perhaps 1 is needed). But... is changing the insides of the
> code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable? If
> everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE
> perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone
> may think that there is an error in the code example.
I don't see anything unreasonable in that example. Whitespace is
insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp).
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:01:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> I don't see anything unreasonable in that example. Whitespace is
> insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp).
Alignment is unreasonable. I just think this example should look like
other examples of this kind - one space, before and after dot - even
if from perspective of code it is correct to put more than one space.
If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add
anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix"
or "not a bug" or something.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 08 Sep 2019 17:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:00:01 +0200
>
> If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add
> anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix"
> or "not a bug" or something.
I cannot know if you are the only one. IME, some people object
vociferously when their bug reports are closed as "wontfix", so I
stopped doing that except when the report is obviously wrong.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37324
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
tags 37324 + wontfix
close 37324
quit
Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> writes:
> If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add
> anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix"
> or "not a bug" or something.
No further comments in 8 days, so I'm closing this now.
Thanks for the report -- I think it's highly useful when people point
out things that they think could be improved. Unfortunately sometimes
people will disagree about what is best, especially when it comes to
stylistic choices which will inevitably be a a bit subjective.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Request was from
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:18:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 327 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.