GNU bug report logs - #37324
Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 17:25:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: wontfix

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 37324 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 37324 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
To: Bug GNU Emacs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:24:30 +0200
In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters
- (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width  . 90))
+ (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))

Line 932 in 'FRAMES.TEXI'.

I think there is one unnecessary "space".


S. U.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:14:24 +0300
> From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:24:30 +0200
> 
> In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters
> - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width  . 90))
> + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
> 
> Line 932 in 'FRAMES.TEXI'.
> 
> I think there is one unnecessary "space".

That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the next.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Sat, 07 Sep 2019 21:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200
>> In Emacs manual INFO 21.11 Frame Parameters
>> - (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width  . 90))
>> + (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(width . 90))
>> (...)
>> I think there is one unnecessary "space".
>
> That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the
> next.

Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example -
before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code
(well, perhaps 1 is needed).  But... is changing the insides of the
code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable?  If
everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE
perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone
may think that there is an error in the code example.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Sun, 08 Sep 2019 02:36:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 05:35:10 +0300
> From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 21:14:31 +0200
> 
> >> I think there is one unnecessary "space".
> >
> > That's on purpose: the example tries to align this line with the
> > next.
> 
> Ok, so I'm guessing that the number of spaces - in this example -
> before and after the dot is insignificant from perspective of the code
> (well, perhaps 1 is needed).  But... is changing the insides of the
> code example just to align it to the next line is reasonable?  If
> everywhere (I think) there is PARAMETER-ONE_SPACE-DOT-ONE_SPACE-VALUE
> perhaps it would be better to stick to that, because otherwise someone
> may think that there is an error in the code example.

I don't see anything unreasonable in that example.  Whitespace is
insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp).




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:01:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:00:01 +0200
> I don't see anything unreasonable in that example.  Whitespace is
> insignificant in cons cells (and in many other places in Lisp).

Alignment is unreasonable.  I just think this example should look like
other examples of this kind - one space, before and after dot - even
if from perspective of code it is correct to put more than one space.

If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add
anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix"
or "not a bug" or something.





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Sun, 08 Sep 2019 17:11:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:10:57 +0300
> Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:00:01 +0200
> 
> If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add
> anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix"
> or "not a bug" or something.

I cannot know if you are the only one.  IME, some people object
vociferously when their bug reports are closed as "wontfix", so I
stopped doing that except when the report is obviously wrong.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#37324; Package emacs. (Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:18:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#37324: Small typo in Emacs manual (frame parameters)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:17:15 +0200
tags 37324 + wontfix
close 37324
quit

Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> writes:

> If I'm the only one with this "problem", i.e. no one else will add
> anything in few(?) days, then you can close this bug as "wontfix"
> or "not a bug" or something.

No further comments in 8 days, so I'm closing this now.

Thanks for the report -- I think it's highly useful when people point
out things that they think could be improved.  Unfortunately sometimes
people will disagree about what is best, especially when it comes to
stylistic choices which will inevitably be a a bit subjective.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas




Added tag(s) wontfix. Request was from Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:18:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 37324 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Sebastian Urban <mrsebastianurban <at> gmail.com> Request was from Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:18:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 327 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.