Subject: Re: bug#3717: M-x man completion

From: Kevin Ryde <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:53:28 +1100

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
>
> This needs to deal with versions of `man' that don't support the -k
> switch.

Is the "apropos" program better?  It's been about 15 years since I had
to use anything other than man-db :-).