Subject: bug#3717: M-x man completion

From: Kevin Ryde <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:12:52 +1100

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:
>
> It's not a feature, AFAIK, more like an accident.

I'm pretty sure it's intentional, explicit in Man-highlight-references,
just not described in the M-x man docstring, and only a bullet point in
the commentary ...

> sed script

That bit's pretty scary.  I supposed it could equally well de-mangle in
the buffer with some lisp, if it was to be re-done.