GNU bug report logs -
#37128
guix system reconfigure stops output after "Evaluating user expression..."
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 37128 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 21 Aug 2019 13:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 21 Aug 2019 13:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
After a guix pull on 0fc235a, guix system reconfigure stop at
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
shepherd: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
instead of
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
shepherd: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
shepherd: Service user-homes has been started.
shepherd: Service term-auto could not be started.
bootloader successfully installed on '/dev/sda’
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The only change I've done to my config.scm is that now I have a btrfs
filesystem (just for storage, it's not /home).
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
> After a guix pull on 0fc235a, guix system reconfigure stop at
>
> shepherd: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
>
>
> instead of
>
> shepherd: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
> shepherd: Service user-homes has been started.
> shepherd: Service term-auto could not be started.
> bootloader successfully installed on '/dev/sda’
>
> The only change I've done to my config.scm is that now I have a btrfs
> filesystem (just for storage, it's not /home).
The “Evaluating user expression” started the ‘file-system’ service for
this btrfs file system, and it got stuck for some reason. Did
/var/log/messages or the console show anything?
I suppose you’d have to try again the experiment. Presumably there’s
some fsck-like process or something taking time or waiting for input.
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This is the last message in /var/log/messages:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Aug 29 09:13:40 localhost shepherd[1]: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> Did
> /var/log/messages or the console show anything?
What console?
> I suppose you’d have to try again the experiment. Presumably there’s
> some fsck-like process or something taking time or waiting for input.
Note that everything works alright. But I'm worried that this would
fail on a new installation where the bootloader is missing :(
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
> This is the last message in /var/log/messages:
>
> Aug 29 09:13:40 localhost shepherd[1]: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
>
>> Did
>> /var/log/messages or the console show anything?
>
> What console?
/dev/console, so tty1, typically.
>> I suppose you’d have to try again the experiment. Presumably there’s
>> some fsck-like process or something taking time or waiting for input.
>
> Note that everything works alright. But I'm worried that this would
> fail on a new installation where the bootloader is missing :(
Where the bootloader is missing? The bootloader cannot be missing or
the thing is not installed. :-)
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Where the bootloader is missing? The bootloader cannot be missing or
> the thing is not installed. :-)
No it's not missing, but I think the bootloader remained from the
previous working configs (before I configured the Btrfs file system).
Say I'd wipe the bootloader now and re-run `guix system reconfigure...',
I don't think it would get installed then.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 29 Aug 2019 22:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On +2019-08-29 14:41:51 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
>
> > This is the last message in /var/log/messages:
> >
> > Aug 29 09:13:40 localhost shepherd[1]: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
> >
> >> Did
> >> /var/log/messages or the console show anything?
> >
> > What console?
>
> /dev/console, so tty1, typically.
>
> >> I suppose you’d have to try again the experiment. Presumably there’s
> >> some fsck-like process or something taking time or waiting for input.
> >
> > Note that everything works alright. But I'm worried that this would
> > fail on a new installation where the bootloader is missing :(
>
> Where the bootloader is missing? The bootloader cannot be missing or
> the thing is not installed. :-)
>
> Ludo’.
>
Had you considered the case where someone[1] is running a binary install
on a foreign distro booted by refind or a bootloader not in your official list?
[1] guess who ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Thu, 29 Aug 2019 23:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Bengt,
Bengt Richter <bokr <at> bokr.com> skribis:
> On +2019-08-29 14:41:51 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
[...]
>> > Note that everything works alright. But I'm worried that this would
>> > fail on a new installation where the bootloader is missing :(
>>
>> Where the bootloader is missing? The bootloader cannot be missing or
>> the thing is not installed. :-)
>>
>> Ludo’.
>>
>
> Had you considered the case where someone[1] is running a binary install
> on a foreign distro booted by refind or a bootloader not in your official list?
I hadn’t! If that’s the case, it’ll be more difficult for us to support
that someone. :-)
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 30 Aug 2019 09:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Just checked: no messages in the /dev/tty1.
Isn't there a more extensive log for "guix system reconfigure"?
Something seems to be wrong with btrfs.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:57:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> writes:
> Isn't there a more extensive log for "guix system reconfigure"?
You could look at the .scm files produced by "guix system reconfigure"
(the store paths should be printed to stdout). I'm afraid that, aside
from Shepherd's own messages, the console output is the canonical log
for "guix system reconfigure" right now.
Regards,
Jakob
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37128
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 22 Sep 2019 16:14:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 37128 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
With today's guix commit
4cd9de6068f439c52f6874f00ec608c41156d095
guix system reconfigure worked flawlessly with the same config.scm.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 263 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.