GNU bug report logs - #37078
27.0.50; Proposal: new introductory section to the Gnus manual

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>

Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:23:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 37078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#37078: 27.0.50; Proposal: new introductory section to the Gnus manual
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:08:20 -0700
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
>> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org,  37078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:49:19 -0700
>>
>> Okay, here's another stab at it. Since the sections have been slimmed
>> down I've just turned them into headings, which I think aids digestion
>> and removes the heading collision problem.
>
> That's okay.
>
>> I feel like adding cross references to the first paragraph of "The
>> Basics of Servers, Groups, and Articles" has made it even harder to
>> parse, and am inclined to turn that into an unordered list of three
>> terms.
>
> I like the result.  Maybe I'm biased, so it would be good to hear
> other opinions.

I don't mind either way, really.

> A few minor Texinfo comments below.
>
>> +using interactive commands in the Server buffer.  See @pxref{Finding
>
> "See @pxref" again.
>
>> +per-group (see @pxref{Mail Sources} for more information).
>
> Same here.

Okay there's something funny going on here. When I run "make" with this
exact diff, the output looks exactly right: "See _Finding the News_ for
details." Same with your other, later notes. If I "C-x C-f" from the
info manual (now I'm in "<emacsbuilddir>/info/") and open gnus.info, I
see there is no "See" in the text, just "*note Finding the News:: for
details."

Playing with this further, the info display seems to be inserting a
"see" if there isn't one, and not if there is.

In the info manual for the texinfo package on my system, it says all
three reference commands (@xref, @ref, and @pxref) will insert a see.
I'm not seeing any doubled "see"s in the output, though.

The texinfo package version on Arch linux is 6.7-3. Could behavior be
different between versions?

Anyway, I've edited my diff according to your notes, please take a look.

Eric

[gnus-intro.diff (text/x-patch, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 298 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.