GNU bug report logs - #36981
26.2; request: add searching by package name to list-packages

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: ndame <emacsuser <at> freemail.hu>

Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:22:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 26.2

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 36981 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Federico Tedin <federicotedin <at> gmail.com>
To: Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 36981 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ndame <emacsuser <at> freemail.hu>
Subject: Re: bug#36981: 26.2;
 request: add searching by package name to list-packages
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:54:56 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Štěpán, thanks for your very detailed feedback.

>> +  (if (or keywords (and packages (listp packages)))
>                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> AKA "(consp packages)", though maybe you find your version more
> descriptive.

Thanks, didn't know they were equivalent.

>> +(defun package-menu-search (name)
>> +  "Filter the *Packages* buffer.
>> +Show only those items whose name matches NAME. If NAME is nil or an
>> +empty string, show all packages.
>
> If I was reading it as a user, I would appreciate it if the doc string
> was more specific regarding the NAME argument, e.g. said "matches the
> regular expression NAME" or something to that effect.

> Also, I think "empty string" is usually prefixed with "the", not "an",
> as there is only one such thing, e.g. (eq "" "") => t. 

I've changed the docstring as you described, I think it's clearer now.

>> +To restore the full package list, type `q'."
>> +  (interactive
>> +   (list (read-from-minibuffer "Package name: ")
>> +         current-prefix-arg))
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Is this a remnant of some previous WIP version? The function now takes a
> single argument, right?

Correct! I forgot to remove it. I was experimenting with making 'C-u s'
search packages by name, but only considering packages that were already
listed. This way it was possible to combine the keyword search and name
search. I decided against it in the end because I'm not sure if it is a
necessary addition.

I'm attaching a new patch with some changes.

- Fede

[search.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 224 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.