GNU bug report logs - #36956
[PATCH] machine: Automatically authorize the coordinator's signing key.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze)

Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:49:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org>
To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" <zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, 36956 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#36956] [PATCH] machine: Automatically authorize the coordinator's signing key.
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:51:24 -0400
Jakob L. Kreuze writes:

> zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes:
>
>> Hi Chris and Ricardo,
>>
>> Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org> writes:
>>
>>> This seems like a good usability improvement. For clarity, I assume
>>> that it's still configurable, however? Would be important if pushing
>>> builds to a different machine.
>>
>> No, but you raise a good point :)  I'll update this patch to make it
>> configurable.
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> This will overwrite an existing acl file on the remote with a copy
>>> that differs only in the newly added key.
>>>
>>> Is there a chance for corruption, e.g. if acl->public-keys returns
>>> something unexpected?
>>
>> I suppose it's possible. 'guix archive --authorize' doesn't seem to do
>> any specific handling for it, but it doesn't hurt to be paranoid -- we
>> "atomically" overwrite the GC root for the bootloader configuration, for
>> example, and we could do something similar here. I'll include it in the
>> updated patch.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>
> I didn't think this all the way through when I wrote this response.
> We're already using 'with-atomic-file-output', so we're already
> "atomically" overwriting the ACL. Also, it wouldn't solve the issue of
> 'acl->public-keys' returning something unexpected.
>
> I'm not sure I have a good solution for this at the moment.

But it's only a problem for guix deploy so far, right?  So it shouldn't
break existing, hopefully-stable guix systems and rather only
bleeding-edge guix deploy systems, right? :)

If that's true then let's file a bug about this issue and get this code
merged after you get this in patch series form.




This bug report was last modified 6 years ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.