GNU bug report logs -
#36943
[PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ebdb.
Previous Next
Reported by: Amin Bandali <bandali <at> gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 06:43:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 36943 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 36943 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36943
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 06 Aug 2019 06:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Amin Bandali <bandali <at> gnu.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 06 Aug 2019 06:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This adds EBDB, an EIEIO port (rewrite) of BBDB.
The package depends on cl-lib and seq. I don’t see any mention of
cl-lib in emacs-xyz.scm, but I do see an ‘emacs-seq’ there, and it’s
used in propagated-inputs of three packages. What’s the preferred way?
Is it fine to omit seq (and other Emacs Core packages that were also
added to GNU ELPA for users of older versions of Emacs), or would it be
best to explicitly add it in propagated-inputs?
[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-ebdb.patch (text/x-patch, inline)]
From 18afb4972d831dffe45e4e2eb63072becd0db4c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amin Bandali <bandali <at> gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 23:06:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ebdb.
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-ebdb): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index 1b6e02bcbc..ee7cd66f60 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2019 Baptiste Strazzulla <bstrazzull <at> hotmail.fr>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Giacomo Leidi <goodoldpaul <at> autitici.org>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Jens Mølgaard <jens <at> zete.tk>
+;;; Copyright © 2019 Amin Bandali <bandali <at> gnu.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -17186,3 +17187,26 @@ time.")
(description "@code{mastodon.el} is an Emacs client for Mastodon, the
federated microblogging social network.")
(license license:gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public emacs-ebdb
+ (let ((commit "2a87f5ed2a53e3a4e91e8c88ba5afc49f5e945df")
+ (revision "0"))
+ (package
+ (name "emacs-ebdb")
+ (version (git-version "0.6.10" revision commit))
+ (source (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/girzel/ebdb.git")
+ (commit commit)))
+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0fidy7z0c86dpqiss97sg5s92fd3fj4bdl8pqqdgg2m00jx4mrjz"))))
+ (build-system emacs-build-system)
+ (home-page "https://github.com/girzel/ebdb")
+ (synopsis "EIEIO port of BBDB, Emacs's contact-management package")
+ (description "EBDB is a contact management/addressbook package for
+Emacs. It's a re-write of the Insidious Big Brother Database (BBDB) using
+Emacs Lisp's (relatively new) EIEIO object oriented libraries.")
+ (license license:gpl3+))))
--
2.22.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36943
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 06 Aug 2019 07:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 36943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Amin Bandali <bandali <at> gnu.org> writes:
> This adds EBDB, an EIEIO port (rewrite) of BBDB.
>
> The package depends on cl-lib and seq. I don’t see any mention of
> cl-lib in emacs-xyz.scm, but I do see an ‘emacs-seq’ there, and it’s
> used in propagated-inputs of three packages. What’s the preferred way?
> Is it fine to omit seq (and other Emacs Core packages that were also
> added to GNU ELPA for users of older versions of Emacs), or would it be
> best to explicitly add it in propagated-inputs?
The package should build without emacs-seq and cl-lib, since Guix ships
with Emacs 25+, so I don't think these packages should be propagated.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#36943
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 11 Aug 2019 16:05:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 36943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
[...]
>
> The package should build without emacs-seq and cl-lib, since Guix ships
> with Emacs 25+, so I don't think these packages should be propagated.
>
> Regards,
Thanks for the reply, makes sense. In that case this should be good to
go, I think. I’d appreciate it if you or someone applied the patch.
I have a few more emacs-xyz patches lined up that I’ll send along soon.
Best,
--
Amin Bandali
Free Software Activist | GNU Webmaster & Volunteer
GPG: BE62 7373 8E61 6D6D 1B3A 08E8 A21A 0202 4881 6103
https://bandalis.org
Reply sent
to
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Amin Bandali <bandali <at> gnu.org>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 36943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Amin,
I’ve pushed it with a comment about why this version was picked with
commit f9ccde2460.
Thanks!
--
Ricardo
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 277 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.