GNU bug report logs -
#36878
'guix system reconfigure' does not reload Shepherd services
Previous Next
Reported by: Robert Vollmert <rob <at> vllmrt.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:19:02 UTC
Severity: important
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:55:45 +0200
with message-id <877e746nxq.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#36878: guix system reconfigure broken
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36878,
regarding 'guix system reconfigure' does not reload Shepherd services
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
36878: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36878
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
it appears that commit 5c8c8c455420af27189d6045b3599fe6e27ad012
guix system: Reimplement 'reconfigure’.
breaks guix system reconfigure. In particular, after reconfiguring,
shepherd doesn’t know about the updated versions of services.
The usual output below is missing; after reverting the commit it’s
fine again.
guix system: loading new services: …
To complete the upgrade, run 'herd restart SERVICE' to stop,
upgrade, and restart each service that was not automatically restarted.
shepherd: Evaluating user expression (let* ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).
shepherd: Service user-homes has been started.
shepherd: Service term-auto could not be started.
bootloader successfully installed on '/dev/sda’
I see that some system tests for “guix system reconfigure” were added
after this change. Might I suggest adding them before the change next
time around, and making sure they pass both before and after?
Cheers
Robert
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis:
> zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes:
>
>> Great :)
>>
>> CC'ing Chris and Dave since I don't have write access -- can we
>> fast-track #36880 into master? I'd consider this to be a high-priority
>> bug fix.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>
> The patch made it into master as 1db6f137d; thanks to Danny for signing
> off on it. Should we close this?
I gather that this particular issue is fixed, so closing the bug now!
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 277 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.