GNU bug report logs -
#36875
[PATCH] doc: Document the use of `program-file' for mcron jobs.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #14 received at 36875 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> From 0fffed46b4899bf0485926399d3971a4b5e94408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 07:34:17 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Document the use of `program-file' for mcron jobs.
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Scheduled Job Execution): Explain why using `program-file'
> for an mcron job can be necessary. Add an example.
[...]
> +For more complex jobs defined in Scheme, it is safer to pass the job as a
> +script to mcron; otherwise, macros defined or imported with @code{use-modules}
> +wouldn't expand correctly, as Guile requires macros to be strictly defined or
> +imported at the top level of a Guile module. This can be achieved using the
> +@code{program-file} procedure from the @code{(guix gexp)} module, as shown in
> +the example below.
Macros are a very good example of the problem, but I wonder if it would
be clearer to simply write something like:
For more complex jobs defined in Scheme where you need control over
the top level, for instance to introduce a @code{use-modules} form, you
can move your code to a separate program using the @code{program-file}
procedure of the @code{(guix gexp)} module (@pxref{G-Expressions}).
The example below illustrates that.
Anyway, your patch looks like a great improvement (and a funny example
:-)) so IMO you should push one version or another!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 273 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.