GNU bug report logs - #36814
[PATCH 0/2] Add VA-API Intel back-end and utilities

Previous Next

Full log

Message #44 received at 36814 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 36814 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#36814] [BONUS PATCH 3/2] gnu: intel-vaapi-driver: Provide
 LIBVA_DRIVERS_PATH.
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:13:31 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> writes:

> Marius Bakke 写道：
>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> 
>> writes:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/video.scm 
>>> (intel-vaapi-driver)[native-search-paths]:
>>> Export LIBVA_DRIVERS_PATH when installed.
>>
>> Can this be squashed into patch 1/2 in this series?
>
> Sure.  I wasn't really going to merge this as FREE BONUS PATCH, 
> don't worry.
>
>>> (libva-without-mesa)[native-search-paths]: Don't inherit any.
>>
>> ..and this added in a separate patch, so that the 
>> intel-vaapi-driver
>> change does not have to go through 'staging'?
>
> Are you sure?  This hunk is here to keep the mesa derivation 
> unchanged.  Removing (or delaying) it *will* cause all of mesa's 
> 1436 dependents to be rebuilt.  I don't think we want that.

I don't see 'libva' being changed anywhere in this series?  The search
path is added for intel-vaapi-driver only, no?

But then, it's 32 degrees here in Trondheim and I just returned from a
hike, so I have probably missed something.

Leaving libva-without-mesa unchanged was my intent too, so I think we
are all good.  :-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.