GNU bug report logs - #36747
Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones

Previous Next

Full log

Message #82 received at 36747 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Cc: 36747 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my
 locally built ones
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 23:19:20 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> writes:

> I rebased 'wip-binaries' on top of current master (which includes the
> recent 'staging' merge), and excluding the update of mescc-tools to the
> git checkout.
>
> I built the bootstrap-tarballs for i686-linux and got the same hashes
> that we've previously agreed on here.  I used "guix download" to load
> the new bootstrap binaries into my store, and am now testing the
> attached draft patch to 'core-updates'.

Excellent, thank you!  The patches LGTM.

I wonder if we should run these through a 'core-updates-next' branch to
give ourselves a little time to bootstrap the different architectures.

(also, it would be neat to get SQLite 3.29.0 in..)

Thoughts?  I don't have a strong opinion, so do what you think is best.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.