GNU bug report logs -
#36747
Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones
Previous Next
Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 22:46:01 UTC
Severity: serious
Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>>> I don’t think we explicitly discussed it, but my assumption is that
>>> we’re delaying merging of ‘core-updates’ into ‘master’ until
>>> ‘core-updates-next’ becomes ‘core-updates’. Is this what you had in
>>> mind? (I’m asking because ‘core-updates’ was almost entirely built
>>> IIRC.)
>>
>> My preference would be to merge 'core-updates-next' into 'core-updates',
>> or equivalently, to apply the following 3 commits to 'core-updates':
>>
>> commit d4bc93abe59e8ffcb8304050c05e727fe0230651
>> Author: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
>> Date: Thu Aug 15 15:39:30 2019 -0400
>>
>> gnu: bootstrap: Update to the 20190815 bootstrap binaries.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm (%bootstrap-linux-libre-headers): Update the
>> download URL.
>> (%bootstrap-mescc-tools, %bootstrap-mes): Update the download URL and hash.
>>
>> commit 82eaac49ac983f28768d6623d802f41cbd7f779b
>> Author: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
>> Date: Thu Aug 15 16:44:36 2019 -0400
>>
>> gnu: bash: Unconditionally configure PGRP_PIPE for *-linux systems.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/patches/bash-linux-pgrp-pipe.patch: New file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>> * gnu/packages/bash.scm (bash)[source]: Add the patch.
>>
>> commit 47fcdfac44c5bf236299679781133468be6f0207
>> Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
>> Date: Thu Aug 22 11:47:27 2019 +0200
>>
>> gnu: bootstrap: Add ftp.gnu.org to '%bootstrap-base-urls'.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm (%bootstrap-base-urls): Add
>> ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap.
>>
>> These commits are the only difference between 'core-updates' and
>> 'core-updates-next'.
>
> OK. The Bash change means we’re rebuilding from scratch on
> architectures, not just x86. So I’ll probably ungraft my Ghostscript
> fix (466ff55c72959ba1499ce3ec69f534b3038eb30b) while we’re at it.
Hmm, good point. Perhaps we should postpone the Bash fix until the next
core-updates cycle. The problem was quite severe in bash-4.4, which
builds incorrectly on linux-5.0 or later, but the issue in bash-5.0 is
far less likely to cause problems in practice: it will build differently
on linux-2.3 or earlier.
What do you think?
>>> Also, what’s the next step for ‘wip-binaries’?
>>
>> Good question! First, I think we should tag it with a name that
>> indicates that it was used to build the 20190815 bootstrap binaries.
>>
>> Optionally, I would advocate merging 'wip-binaries' into 'master'.
>
> Fine with me! Could you take care of tagging and merging?
Sure, will do.
Thanks,
Mark
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 317 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.