GNU bug report logs - #36738
[PATCH] guix deploy: Support '--no-grafts' and '--system'

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org (宋文武)

Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 05:06:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org (宋文武)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 36738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze)
To: iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org (宋文武)
Cc: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org>, 36738 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, "Thompson, 
 David" <dthompson2 <at> worcester.edu>
Subject: Re: [bug#36738] [PATCH] guix deploy: Support '--no-grafts' and
 '--system'
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:46:06 -0400
zerodaysfordays <at> sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes:

> Great idea. I think that continuing to call the machine's
> <operating-system> 'system' would be confusing if we introduced the
> notion of a target architecture, because we use "system" to refer to
> the target architecture in the rest of Guix's command-line tools.
> Maybe it would make sense to rename the <operating-system> field to
> 'os' or something similar, and use the 'system' field to specify the
> target architecture instead? Any thoughs?

Actually, I had a thought. Why should we make this explicit, when we
could take an implicit approach and identify the target's architecture
with 'remote-eval'? Ideally, we'll be probing the machines anyway to
implement safety checks on the <operating-system> declaration, so why
not just add this to our list of pre-deployment tests?

Regards,
Jakob




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 301 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.