GNU bug report logs - #36729
27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mattias EngdegÄrd <mattiase <at> acm.org>

Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:41:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: patch, wontfix

Merged with 44273

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #35 received at 36729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: mattiase <at> acm.org, 36729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman <at> gmx.net
Subject: RE: bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 19:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
> > Another good reason is that a given user's system
> > `ls' command might support switches and behavior
> > that ls-lisp does not support.  That one you left
> > out, and it's the one that most directly concerns
> > ls-lisp.  Ls-lisp is not, and likely will never
> > be, a complete replacement for all of the possible
> > `ls' commands out there.
> 
> That is only true for some switches of GNU 'ls', AFAIK.

And perhaps not just GNU.

ls-lisp supports the `ls' switches that are common.
AFAIK, it doesn't claim to support every switch of
every `ls', even one being added tonight to some
system.

But if I'm wrong, and it commits to keeping up with
all systems that have `ls' and that might add a
switch (or change a switch's behavior), then more
power to it.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 260 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.