GNU bug report logs - #36729
27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org>

Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:41:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: patch, wontfix

Merged with 44273

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 36729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org>
Cc: 36729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman <at> gmx.net, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 17:29:47 +0300
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 10:19:13 +0200
> Cc: 36729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>,
>         Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> 
> 19 juli 2019 kl. 14.16 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>:
> > 
> > Feel free to suggest a clarification in the doc string of 'dired'.
> 
> Frankly, I wouldn't know what to write. That the number should be ignored? We'd better remove it in the first place.

(Your reaction seems to imply that I said something silly.  Did I?)

Your original report was about the unclear units of the value, so a
useful clarification would be to tell something about those units.
That is what I had in mind when I suggested a doc clarification.

> Migrating to a fully built-in directory lister seems to be the only
> sane way out, and it's considerably more work than I anticipated for
> this little detail.

We already have ls-lisp.el.  It isn't used on platforms where 'ls' is
available because AFAIK using 'ls' is faster.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 260 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.