GNU bug report logs -
#36708
guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update
Previous Next
Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 18:53:02 UTC
Severity: important
Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:11:54 -0400
with message-id <87blwgzyyy.fsf <at> netris.org>
and subject line Re: bug#36708: Serving an up-to-date https://guix.gnu.org/packages
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36708,
regarding guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
36708: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36708
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
As I write this, <https://guix.gnu.org/packages/> is over 6 weeks stale,
but claims to have been updated two days ago, on July 15:
"GNU Guix provides 9,789 packages transparently available as pre-built
binaries. These pages provide a complete list of the packages. Our
continuous integration system shows their current build status
(updated July 15, 2019)."
The same site shows the latest 'linux-libre' package to be 5.1.5:
https://guix.gnu.org/packages/L/page/5/
In fact, 'linux-libre' was updated to 5.1.6 early on June 1st:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=b6cf7e54ea412ed24e6b3ca55a5b452a70ec957f
Mark
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> The package list at <https://guix.gnu.org/packages> is made from the
>> current ‘guix’ package, not from the latest ‘master’. We should
>> work to build it dynamically with something like hpcguix-web, or to
>> generate it from an inferior of ‘master’.
>
> I went for the latter option in commit
> 9dbb0073be83c25b44400a62ec22d0b240a88130 of guix-artwork.git.
>
> That approach was also motivated by the fact that people would get
> different behavior depending on whether their ‘guix’ package depends on
> guile-json <at> 1 or @3, as reported by nixo on IRC.
>
> That’s also the reason why the web site was no longer updated since
> 9c6f714305460e99c681d9b7f368e13bfe49fdd9 was pushed: the ‘guix’ on
> berlin is still on guile-json <at> 1, but said commit expects guile-json <at> 3.
>
> If everything goes well, we should see an up-to-date list at
> <https://guix.gnu.org/packages> within 40 minutes.
Looks good to me. I'm closing this bug now.
Thank you! :)
Mark
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 268 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.