GNU bug report logs - #36684
"View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 06:42:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: unreproducible

Done: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36684: closed ("View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 23:33:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:32:34 -0800
with message-id <87zhgv5re5.fsf <at> garuda.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
and subject line Re: bug#36684: "View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36684,
regarding "View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
36684: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36684
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: "View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:41:06 -0700
Hi,

Sometimes, I see an error like the following (it is not specific to
ant-bootstrap):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix package -m ~/profile-packages.scm 
...
building /gnu/store/76apf0hpcdabpjy0839nhkwgfrz3m8z5-ant-bootstrap-1.8.4.drv...
| 'build' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/76apf0hpcdabpjy0839nhkwgfrz3m8z5-ant-bootstrap-1.8.4.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/76apf0hpcdabpjy0839nhkwgfrz3m8z5-ant-bootstrap-1.8.4.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/76/apf0hpcdabpjy0839nhkwgfrz3m8z5-ant-bootstrap-1.8.4.drv.bz2'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/3l11fmnyc4k1dcwlijk4vdsq70jc4lqs-icedtea-3.7.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
killing process 20600
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/b071r8bm2n01mp50g6r5ghxl0m09akdx-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix package: error: build of `/gnu/store/b071r8bm2n01mp50g6r5ghxl0m09akdx-profile.drv' failed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

But when I try to view the log file very quickly after getting these
messages (within about 1 minute or so), I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ file  /var/log/guix/drvs/7f/n896phqyv9r636yhjipa9k4qm7g9ni-evolution-data-server-3.30.2.drv.bz2
/var/log/guix/drvs/7f/n896phqyv9r636yhjipa9k4qm7g9ni-evolution-data-server-3.30.2.drv.bz2: empty
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

However, when I come back a few minutes later, mysteriously the file has
been populated:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ file  /var/log/guix/drvs/7f/n896phqyv9r636yhjipa9k4qm7g9ni-evolution-data-server-3.30.2.drv.bz2 
/var/log/guix/drvs/7f/n896phqyv9r636yhjipa9k4qm7g9ni-evolution-data-server-3.30.2.drv.bz2: bzip2 compressed data, block size = 900k
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Indeed, I was originally going to report that the file was empty, but
while I was writing this email, it filled up!  Is this behavior
expected?  I anticipated that the file would be finalized (empty or not)
before the helpful message "View built log at ..." was printed, but it
seems like that message is proleptic, which makes it a little confusing.

-- 
Chris


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>, 36684-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#36684: "View build log" - but it's empty (at first)!
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:32:34 -0800
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> I’ve never experienced it.  Is there a scenario that allows you to
> reproduce it?

I have not been able to reproduce this issue; maybe I was simply
confused when I opened the bug report.  Let's close this for now.

-- 
Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 187 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.