GNU bug report logs - #36649
27.0.50; pure space and pdumper

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:27:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu, rpluim <at> gmail.com, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, pipcet <at> gmail.com, 36649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, akrl <at> sdf.org
Subject: bug#36649: 27.0.50; pure space and pdumper
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:18:06 +0300
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:41:28 -0700
> Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, rpluim <at> gmail.com, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org, 
> 	monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, pipcet <at> gmail.com, 36649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
> 	larsi <at> gnus.org, akrl <at> sdf.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> I doubt whether it's worth spending much time debugging the problem,
> >> since nobody uses unexec on GNU/Linux any more.
> >
> > Since we decided not to remove unexec in Emacs 28, we do need to keep
> > the unexec configuration working.
> 
> Should we consider removing unexec in Emacs 29?

That's possible, but we still have plenty of time before we get to the
decision point, and have no information at all regarding whether
unexec is still used with Emacs 28 (because it wasn't released yet).
So it's too early to make the decision, and we have no data on which
to base the decision.




This bug report was last modified 199 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.